AON

Seems correct as you can see the light below reach up to the upper beam.

upon reflection it seems the headroom is needed on centre below this deck, in the hold. the higher line seems like the wings (officer's quarters) hopefully someone with more experience can confirm.

Possibly it is reversed? The lower section is on centre for more clearance passing through and the raised levels are the officers cabins? They'd step up into them. I admit it is all unexpected. I am just guessing. Waiting for someone "in the know" to enlighten us both!

You only had to measure it three times to be confident it was correct before you started potentially butchering the whole thing. I am impressed!

You've got steadier hands than I! I don't think I could have masked that adequately.

I wonder how they would look after sitting around untouched for a month or more?

I am interested in the answer too!

That's what I was thinking... it looks quite smart and tiddley (finished) with the batten!

A few drop planks would fill that nicely. As it will be right side up who will notice.

The words that come to mind are using drop planks and stealers but I do not see a need for them yet in your photos above. Take a look at post #34 at: https://modelshipworld.com/topic/37626-hms-harpy-1796-by-blue-ensign-–-vanguard-models-164-scale/page/2/#comment-1081778 You will see some quite good examples of drop planks and stealers if you should need to use them. Have you tried steaming or soaking your plank in hot water then clamping them to dry to shape before installing permanently?

Good morning Dave and welcome to MSW. As a newbie to the hobby you might consider joining a local club. If you haven't one near you on your side of the river you might consider one nearby on the other side. Check us out at: https://www.mson.ca/ We are having our February meeting this afternoon at 1:30 PM ET and they run about 2 hours.... well before the football game today. You can attend via zoom. Email us from the email address on the web page and I will send you the zoom link.

I completed the assembly of all 28 of the gun deck 32 Pdrs. After some encouragement from one of our club (MSON) members I again attempted to dry rub the barrels to try and make the details more visible as they were lost in the flat black. You can see the results in the close up... the one that shows the dust! The raised details (reinforcing rings, powder pan, royal cypher) are not very high at near 0.01" so I found it difficult to try and apply the dry rub to only the raised parts. So I gave up on focusing on that and focused on the results which in essence mutes the flat black and shows the detail as compared to the image in post 1741 above. I added the wooden quoin handles. They are made from Pau Marfim cut and sanded down to 0.06" square strips, one end sharpened to a point and then pulled through the two largest holes on the draw plate to round them to 0.057". The end of each handle was sanded round prior to cutting them off of the strip to then glue them into the drilled hole in the quoin. Now I go back to re-installing my orlop and gun decks.

what is the flanged hole under the support just to the right of the centre of the last photo?

The photo below is my setup for soft soldering two breech rings at a time. The soldering station was purchased from https://gesswein.ca/products/grs-soldering-station They were considerably less expensive when I got mine! It is meant for silver soldering, but I normally use it when using my butane torch and copper-phosphorus wire solder. This solder allows me to blacken the copper wire and solder joint with LOS (Liver of Sulphur). The 60/40 soft solder I used on the thin gauge copper wire here (0.5 mm = 0.02" dia) will not blacken with LOS so I used a black permanent marker as I've seen done by other modellers in our local club.

I also have a copy of the tables by Edwin Newell Rich from NRG spring 1962 issue 12-1

I have a copy of the table Tackle + Breeching scantlings The Sea-gunner's Vade-mecum Being a New Introduction to Practical Gunnery by Robert Simmons, 1812 It would be interesting to compare this to your table. Would please you send me a copy.

For those interested ... The 0.5 mm (0.02") diameter copper wire was from Billings Boats: P/N 04-BF-022A The package has two coils but they do not state the length. I emailed them and they told me each coil is 250 cm (98.4"/coil)... so I can now figure out how much more I might need to complete 74 guns. The formula for sizing the eye bolt and breech rope ring wire size and the breech ring diameter was found in the NRJ Publication 36-2, page 100: Sizing Gun-Tackle and Breeching Eyebolts and Rings - Published by I.R.Butts (Boston, 1858) It states that to calculate the size of wire for carriage gun-tackle eye bolts and breeching rope rings, "multiply the diameter of shot by 0.2, the answer is the diameter in 8ths". It also states that the breech ring inner diameter is "to be in the clear of the diameter of the shot". I found a table that stated the inside diameter of the eye (the loop) was in essence clear of the diameter of the wire: 32Pdr @ 1.83" inner diameter = 0.028" at 1:64

Completed the painting of all 28 x 32 Pdr carriages and the assembly of one. Carriage painting was done with brushes. Three coats of yellow ochre and then spots with black. Could have used younger, steadier hands for the fine black touch ups... but it look fine from 12" away. The camera hides nothing! The cannon was spray painted with acrylic flat black some time ago, multiple coats. I tried highlighting the reinforcing rings and royal cypher with a smokey grey but it made a mess as it is all so tiny. The cap square is card stock blackened with a permanent marker. The one end is curled over itself. The cap square chain is simply black sewing thread. I tried a finger knitted chain stitch, which look quite good until set up to the carriage and it was about 3X too large for the scale. The eye bolts and breech ring are made with 0.02" (5mm) copper wire, the proper scale. The breech rope ID (0.1") is correct but the eye loop (0.06") is larger than it should be as this was the size I was comfortable with. Eye bolts were twisted over a 14 AWG copper wire (0.06" dia) ... I do not have a 1/16" drill bit to use for this. The breech ring was coiled over a 7/64th drill bit, multiple wraps and then cut with hobby snips to produce multiple coils at once. They were soft soldered 60/40 (% tin/lead) solder. The eye loops and rings were blackened with a permanent marker. I used Weldbond, water based PVA glue to assemble all the parts. It dries crystal clear. The quoin handle was made from a small diameter maple dowel, sanded down while mounted on the drill press and then pulled through a draw plate. All holes in the carriage were pilot holes and needed to be opened up for the twisted wire eye bolt stubs and quoin handle. Presently, I have all the breech rope rings (54 ea) made and soldered. Going to start on the (189 ea) eye bolts next.

Do you stack the spacers to get the variety of thickness in 0.25mm increments?

Good evening Bruce. I just watched the NRG video of your presentation last Saturday... Well Done! I am sorry I missed sitting in on it but I had an unexpected early morning appointment elsewhere that kept me away. Alan

I hate to say it... but sometimes a "do over" is the best answer. Remove the offending part and make a new one. Seems like a kick in the sensitive parts right now, but when your done you will be much happier and will be wondering why you hesitated... but we all do so you are not alone.

Would you consider using brass metallic paint?

It takes some practice but it is somewhat like tensioning a stringed instrument... you pluck it. see here: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+tension+a+scroll+saw+blade&oq=how+to+tension+a+scroll+saw+blade&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyCQgAEEUYORiABDIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIICAQQABgWGB4yCAgFEAAYFhgeMggIBhAAGBYYHjIICAcQABgWGB4yCAgIEAAYFhgeMggICRAAGBYYHtIBCjIwOTU0ajBqMTWoAgiwAgE&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:0917ef03,vid:gW-tO2Jx4Gc,st:50

Looking forward to seeing her at the MSON club meeting tomorrow!

http://www.uppercanadahistory.ca/1812/18125.html