Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a little cutter, Toni, that I think will work for thinning the frames.  I'm going to try it on one of the scrap pieces of bulkhead to see how it works.  The cutter is for my Dremel.  I'll have to see if it fits in the Harbor Freight rotary tool.

 

The Dremel, is such a great tool.  I've had mine since about 1983 and it works as well today as it did back then.

 

 

 

Dan

Posted (edited)

Hey Dan

 

I used some cutter from Disston that I bought from Menards for my Dremel. They worked great for fairing the inside of my small boats for the Conny. I even think Dremel makes also. I just used them at slow speed and went slow. Be careful not to go too deep. Hope this helps

 

post-747-0-27269100-1384887803_thumb.jpg

 

post-747-0-06807500-1384887818_thumb.jpg

Edited by Geoff Matson

Geoff

NRG member #2666
Current build : USS Constitution

 

Finished builds: Armed Virginia Sloop (in gallery)

Posted

Thanks, Geoff.  I'm going to have to look around at Home Depot for those cutters.

 

I did some more fairing of the frames last night.  It is slow work.  I used some Dremel sanding disks (220 grit) that fit my Harbor Freight rotary tool.  That helped out a lot, as you can see.

 

post-1141-0-75028100-1385133893_thumb.jpg

 

I followed up with a lot of sanding with my good old sanding stick.  I put a rounded end on it using my belt sander.  That allowed me to work on curved surfaces a little better.  It's still slow work, though.

 

And it's rough with any of these methods to get in the tight spots at the bow and, to a lesser extent, the stern.

 

post-1141-0-18622800-1385133984_thumb.jpg

 

Anyone got a good method for doing this?  As you can see, there's still some thinning that needs to be done on those forwardmost franes.  You can still see char marks from where the bulkheads were broken out.  Farther aft, those marks are gone because I could think the keelson down to the top of the frame.

 

 

Dan

Posted

I used a dremel with sanding drum...the small sanding drums.  The frames were taken down almost to the right size.  It leaves a very rough and irregular finish but does the job and you need to be very careful and use a light touch.

 

Then the sanding sticks and other folded pieces of sandpaper cleaned it up.  You have to get those frames pretty thin towards the top so the caprail isnt too wide.  It will make the model look heavy and chunky.   Making it thin gives the model a light and delicate feel.

 

Chuck

Posted

I've thinned all the frames out.  Tonight I cut down the ends of the frames.  I only snapped off three of them.  You can see one of them in this photo, glued back in.

 

Here's the question.  It's time to, as Chuck says in the instructions, "sand the tops of the frames and the sheer to get a smooth run bow to stern."  One could, I think, say I have that now, but in other photos, it looks like the top of the top plank should be a little lower on the transom.  Mine is level with the top of the transom.

 

I'm thinking I need to taper the aft end of that plank to give myself some room on the transom for the cap rail.  Am I thinking about this correctly?  Should it be about the thickness of the cap rail?  (That's my guess.)

 

 

 

Dan

post-1141-0-14642200-1385611942_thumb.jpg

post-1141-0-14007900-1385612280_thumb.jpg

Posted

Yes you do....But not just at the stern..The whole bulwark should be lowered by about 1/16" give-or-take.  Its hard to tell from your photos though.  I would look at the other logs and my prototype and do a comparison.  Its hard to tell at this point with the tops of the frames flush with the planking.

 

Having not started the planking at the top to establish the proper sheer line I think the one you ended up with is quite arbitrary.  This is what caused the issue.  You can see how much of the frames remained above the planking on the prototype....the transom sticks up much higher.  But its not just your stern..Its whole length needs to be shorter.  This is a good opportunity to draw a nice graceful curve of a sheer line and then file down to it.

 

 

Chuck

 

sternpost.jpg

Posted

Thanks, Chuck.

 

Here's a picture of the hull with all the frames sticking up.

 

post-1141-0-50593200-1386000033_thumb.jpg

 

Last night, I did what I should have done from the start:  layed a piece of planking along where the sheer line ought to be.  I clamped it in place and then marked the line.  Then I cut down the bow and stern to match that line.  Here's the hull after cutting the top plank down to the sheer line.

 

post-1141-0-10866000-1386000102_thumb.jpg

 

The result looks a lot like your prototype.  There's more room at the transom, certainly.  The sheer line is not very pronounced, though.  I may increase that some. 

 

 

 

Dan

 

 

Posted

That is better and I did the same by making the sheer curve more towards the middle.  That is more in line with teh 1750's and 60's.

 

The straighter sheer is more in line with those boats made much later.

 

Chuck

Posted

Not a great deal of progress to report, but here's what I've been working on lately.

 

I cut the top strake down ... too much.  Certainly it needed cutting down at the transom.  There was no room for the caprail otherwise, but, when I laid that batten down to mark the sheer line, it looked like I needed to take some off the bow too.  I went at it, cutting down below the notch in the stem.  When I'd done that, I realized that 1) I'd taken all the sheer out and 2) that the stem was now far too high.  If I'd left it like that, the caprail wouldn't even have covered up the notch in the stem.

 

Time for some surgery...

 

I built the top plank up again and repaired the frames that I'd cut down too far.  I also reinforced the filler pieces at the bow.  Here's what it looks like now.

 

post-1141-0-63861700-1386257784_thumb.jpg

 

And here's the stern, the part I did right!

 

post-1141-0-49214000-1386257830_thumb.jpg

 

So here's what the sheer line looks like now.  Not really very pronounced...

 

post-1141-0-12875800-1386257873_thumb.jpg

 

And then I started making the caprail.  I ripped the thin board wide enough to make one of the caprails.

 

post-1141-0-53263400-1386257913_thumb.jpg

 

Then I traced the outline of the hull.

 

post-1141-0-29225200-1386257941_thumb.jpg

 

Then I drew a second line 1/8" inboard of the first.

 

post-1141-0-52985400-1386257974_thumb.jpg

 

I'll make the other side tonight.  I need to get a strip of Evergreen plastic to use as a spacer, like BobF did, so I can sand this down to its final shape.

 

As for the sheer, I think I need to use the caprail to identify any high or low spots on the sheer line.  I'm having a hard time seeing it the way it is.  I may make the sheer a little more pronounced, but I'm worried about making it uneven -- port to starboard -- and feel I need some kind of reference to check against.  The caprail should do that for me.

 

 

 

Dan

Posted

Just a suggestion...  When making the caprail, make it very oversized.  You can always make it smaller with a Dremel drum sander..

Toni


Chairman Nautical Research Guild

Member Nautical Research and Model Society

Member Midwest Model Shipwrights

 

Current Builds:     Utrecht-1742

Completed Builds: Longboat - 1:48 scale       HMS Atalanta-1775 - 1:48 scale       Half Hull Planking Project      Capstan Project     Swallow 1779 - 1:48 scale      Echo Cross Section   NRG Rigging Project 

                           Utrecht-1742

Gallery:  Hannah - 1:36 scale.

Posted

Got the caprail finished off last night.  (Only had to scrap and remake one of them!)  Toni's advice is good.  Make that caprail good and wide.  It's easier to make it more narrow than to make it wider ... which is why one of mine had to be scrapped.  I thought I'd made it wide enough, but it was too narrow at the bow and patching it up wouldn't have looked good.  The better solution was just to throw it away and make a new one.

 

Now on to the friezes.  The instructions call for a fixative to be applied.  What fixative have people used?  Is this something easily obtained at an art supply store?

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Dan

Posted

Yes you can get a good spray-on matte fixative but it can be expensive.  A good alternative would be to use any hairspray you can find.   Its cheaper and basically the same stuff.  If you find one with a UV protection it will actually help prevent the ink from fading.  This is what I use.  Spray a light coat first and then apply to more heavier coats.  But dont soak it as the ink will probably spread.

 

Chuck

Posted

I used a low luster clear coat oil based finish (Testor's I think.)  The ink did not bleed. 

Toni


Chairman Nautical Research Guild

Member Nautical Research and Model Society

Member Midwest Model Shipwrights

 

Current Builds:     Utrecht-1742

Completed Builds: Longboat - 1:48 scale       HMS Atalanta-1775 - 1:48 scale       Half Hull Planking Project      Capstan Project     Swallow 1779 - 1:48 scale      Echo Cross Section   NRG Rigging Project 

                           Utrecht-1742

Gallery:  Hannah - 1:36 scale.

Posted

I printed up a couple of copies of the Long Boat friezes, figuring I'd have to do some experimenting to get this part of the model right.  I sprayed two coats of hairspray on one of the sheets.  There was no color bleeding whatsoever, so that was good.  The paper did crinkle up a little, but I doubt that's going to do any harm.  The paper is still plenty flexible, but now the friezes themselves are "fixed."  Now that it's completely dry, I might put a heavy book on the page to flatten it out.  Probably not necessary, but it couldn't hurt.

 

One other thing I was thinking about...

 

I've got to paint this boat.  I was considering getting some acrylic paints from Badger.  Here are the colors I chose:

 

post-1141-0-45670500-1387312009_thumb.png

 

Anyone got any thoughts on this?  I think these are the only colors I'll need.

 

And I see Model Expo sells a paint set for the Long Boat ... for about $40.00.  Anyone know what's in that set?  Anything different from what I've chosen?

 

 

 

Dan

Posted

Dan:

I agree with Chuck.  I don't think you would be happy with any of the Model Expo paints compared to Badger - you know my bias - but I think the ME paints are horrible compared to any other paint.

Kurt

Kurt Van Dahm

Director

NAUTICAL RESEARCH GUILD

www.thenrg.org

SAY NO TO PIRACY. SUPPORT ORIGINAL IDEAS AND MANUFACTURERS

CLUBS

Nautical Research & Model Ship Society of Chicago

Midwest Model Shipwrights

North Shore Deadeyes

The Society of Model Shipwrights

Butch O'Hare - IPMS

Posted

A little more progess has been made ... and more questions raised.

 

I got the caprail installed and I think it looks great.  Lots of sanding involved in this, but nothing difficult at all.

 

post-1141-0-87489200-1387557287_thumb.jpg

 

And then it was on to the friezes.  I was dreading this step because it really looked like it was going to be a tough thing to pull off, but, in the end, it went very smoothly.  I cut the friezes out and attached them with white glue.

 

post-1141-0-02290300-1387557380_thumb.jpg

 

post-1141-0-32624900-1387557400_thumb.jpg  post-1141-0-77455600-1387557416_thumb.jpg

 

post-1141-0-72955500-1387557429_thumb.jpg

 

The stern frieze was a little more difficult and here's where the question comes in.  Looking at the other pictures here on the forum, it looked as if Chuck attached the colored part of the frieze and painted around it.  It looks like Toni adhered the entire frieze, with the white part, and then cut around it.  Looked to me like this was a judgement call ... so I made the call and adhered just the colored part of the frieze.

 

post-1141-0-33315200-1387557547_thumb.jpg

 

Did I make the right call?

 

Aligning the frieze, I found, was the most difficult part of the operation.  What you see above is my second attempt ... in keeping with my practice of building everything at least twice.  The glue dried so fast on the first attempt that I couldn't nudge it into place.  I removed it, cut another frieze out and attached it as you see above.

 

Based on Bob's recommendations, I used a small amount of Elmer's White Carpenter's Wood Putty to fill in the small gaps at the bow.  (You can see that filler in the pictures.)  Now that I've made this call on the stern, I'm going to need a little bit of putty there too.

 

As for paints, I couldn't find a place that had the Badger paints, but after discussing what I was looking for with the guys at Al's Hobby Shop, I chose Model Master Acrylics.  That's my next step!

 

 

 

Dan

 

 

post-1141-0-76891700-1387557870_thumb.jpg

Posted

Dan
Al's carries the Badger RR colors - same identical paint as the Marine paints.  If you ever need to know the exact match between RR and Marine let me know - I have the master list.  All the Marine colors except 6 or 7 have a RR match.  Comes out of the same 5 gallon container.

Kurt

Kurt Van Dahm

Director

NAUTICAL RESEARCH GUILD

www.thenrg.org

SAY NO TO PIRACY. SUPPORT ORIGINAL IDEAS AND MANUFACTURERS

CLUBS

Nautical Research & Model Ship Society of Chicago

Midwest Model Shipwrights

North Shore Deadeyes

The Society of Model Shipwrights

Butch O'Hare - IPMS

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

There's a company here in the US that makes posters with demotivating statements on them, a kind of antidote to all those motivational posters one finds in many offices.  This one's my favorite:

 

post-1141-0-10056000-1388287226_thumb.png

 

This is the story of my modeling life...  My work serves as a warning to others.

 

Following Chuck's earlier advice, I sanded the caprail down more, as far as I thought I could go without doing more harm than good to the model.  They're as narrow as I can make them now.

 

After attaching the friezes and then adding the rail below them, I noticed some inconsistency along the length of the boat.  Here's a photo of the port side from the most unflattering angle.

 

post-1141-0-10784400-1388287352_thumb.jpg

 

I wrote an email to BobF and asked his advice.  He told me that, if I'd been using white glue, I should be able to loosen it up with water and adjust the rail.  I had used white glue, but I was still a little concerned that I would mess up the frieze by messing around with water.  Not to worry, though.  Using a small amount of water and a little piece of boxwood I had around, I cajoled the rail back into true.  When the glue dried again, it was in the right place.

 

Reading Chuck's instructions again and looking at some of the other logs here, I became convinced that I'd done the stern frieze incorrectly.  According to the instructions, the white stripe around the frieze should be 1/32" wide.  Mine was more like 3/32", so I decided to re-do that too.  I cut out a larger frieze, with the white part.  I sanded the old one off.  This would be the third time around for that stern freize.  The first I removed by wetting it, which caused the transom to swell and threatened to loosen the planks surrounding it.  Sanding it off got around that problem.

 

post-1141-0-38347200-1388287705_thumb.jpg

 

Note, I also put the stern block in place and trimmed the false keel down to the right length.

 

I wanted to add the extra plank shown in the NMM photos and which Bob had installed on his model.  Bob helped me out with dimensions for those planks and I carefully made up a couple.  I cut them down to a width of 3/32" first and then sanded them to 1/64" thickness, a time consuming project which, if done too fast, results in splintered planks.  My advice:  go slowly.

 

post-1141-0-75445500-1388287969_thumb.jpg

 

Here are those planks, installed.  You can see the marked improvement in the rails below the friezes.

 

post-1141-0-94396000-1388287901_thumb.jpg

 

post-1141-0-10225000-1388287920_thumb.jpg

 

And here's the new stern frieze.

 

post-1141-0-64099400-1388287950_thumb.jpg

 

I did plank the hull from the bottom up and that resulted in an odd-looking run of planks at the sheer.  The friezes and the extra plank go a long way toward correcting that odd appearance.  The run of planks looks much better now, I think, and the extra plank is more consistent with the prototype.  Straightening out that rail makes a world of difference and I think the stern frieze looks quite a lot better now too.  (There's still some trimming needed on that frieze.  That'll be done tomorrow.)  Then it's off to the paint shop for the boat!

 

 

 

Dan

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I've been putting it off:  painting the bottom of the boat.  There are reasons for this.  First, getting the waterline on straight has been weighing heavily on my mind.  How should I do that?  Second, masking the area off and not getting paint under the tape or ripping the paint off removing the tape or God only knows what else could go wrong...  Third, I need to airbrush that paint on, but I've never used my airbrush before.  I could spend time learning how to use the airbrush, but I really want to move forward on the Longboat.  The result of all this:  paralysis.

 

Last night, I hoisted myself off my half-moons and started.  I strapped the model to the building board with rubber bands and leveled it out on the kitchen counter.

 

post-1141-0-10378700-1389990706_thumb.jpg

 

Then I constructed a High Speed, Low Drag Waterline Marketing Gauge using the Legos that the kids have strewn all over my house.

 

post-1141-0-20846400-1389990754_thumb.jpg

 

I drew on the waterline and then used Tamiya 6 mm masking tape to tape off the waterline.  Only concern I had was where the tape buckled on the inside of the curve around the bow.  I used a bone folder -- a piece of polished bone used to make very precise creases in book binding materials -- to burnish the tape down.

 

post-1141-0-98198300-1389990811_thumb.jpg

 

post-1141-0-04158200-1389990827_thumb.jpg

 

Tonight -- assuming I get the time to do it -- I'm going to putter around with the airbrush.  I have the Model Master Acryl paint.  (Heretical, I know.)  I got some Model Master Acryl thinner so I can clean the airbrush.  (I think I can spray that stuff without thinning it.  I'll see how that goes.

 

If all goes well, I'll get the bottom of the boat painted this weekend and move along to the next stage.

 

One of these days, I'm going to be able to see around corners.  That's my issue right now.  Almost everything I'm doing, I'm doing for the first time, which means I have to learn how to do it, mess it up a couple of times and re-do it.  That stretches out the timeline.  It's fun -- don't get me wrong -- but frustrating at the same time because I'd like to be making more progress more quickly without sacrificing quality.  It reminds me of a line from Chaucer:  "The lyf so short, the craft so longe to lerne."
 

 

 

 

Dan 

Posted

Dan, Thanks for taking the time to put all this information and photos in your build log. I have one of these little boats in my stash but don't feel I'm ready to build it just yet. Yours is looking darn nice and you are gaining some good expierience in the proccess.

 

Al

The heart is happiest when the head and the hands work together.

Al

 

Current Builds:

HMS Halifax 1/48 POF Lumberyard Kit

Model Shipways Glad Tidings

Acoustic Guitar Build FINISHED

Posted

Dan, just be sure to play around with that airbrush off the model first.  BTW, my paint was applied with a brush.  When it came to applying paint near the masking tape, make sure that the brush is almost dry and paint from the tape down to the wood.  As soon as the paint is dry-ish get the tape off so it does not tear out the paint.  If you have to apply a second coat (I did) stay away from that nice crisp line by masking over it with the blue painters tape.  Don't burnish it and get it off as soon as the second coat is applied.  You'll do just fine.

Toni


Chairman Nautical Research Guild

Member Nautical Research and Model Society

Member Midwest Model Shipwrights

 

Current Builds:     Utrecht-1742

Completed Builds: Longboat - 1:48 scale       HMS Atalanta-1775 - 1:48 scale       Half Hull Planking Project      Capstan Project     Swallow 1779 - 1:48 scale      Echo Cross Section   NRG Rigging Project 

                           Utrecht-1742

Gallery:  Hannah - 1:36 scale.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Taking Toni's advice, I practiced with the airbrush before pointing it at the model!  That was time well spent.

 

In the end, the masking tape came off just fine.  I got a nice, sharp line.  Thing is, the line wasn't exactly where I wanted it.  I swear, I looked this over ... and over ... and over before putting paint on the model.  When I pulled off the tape and looked at the waterline, it dipped quite a lot at the stern.  I masked it again and ran it up a little higher at the stern and it looks much better.  One more run at this should have it dead straight.

 

post-1141-0-40746500-1390845252_thumb.jpg

 

Here's a view of the bottom of the boat, before fixing the waterline.

 

post-1141-0-04628100-1390845284_thumb.jpg

 

So what's the trick here?  I thought I'd gone down the right path with my waterline marker.  Looking at it with the masking tape on, I thought I had a nice, straight waterline.  When I got done painting, it wasn't what I wanted.

 

This is one of those fixable errors, but it would have been nice to get this one right the first time!

 

 

 

Dan

Posted

Its an optical illusion actually.   The trick is to make the line slightly off and upward towards the stern to compensate.  Its a common thing.  It depends on the hull shape how bad the illusion will be.  It will most likely only become evident after you finish and you will always have to make adjustments.

 

Chuck

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...