Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Good afternoon, dear colleagues.

There are many models in NMM, which show that the boat stands on the topmaps and is secured with ropes.

Several books have brief information on this, which is based on the same models from the museum, I think so.

 

Interested in more detailed information on how the boat was attached to the topmaps in the 18th century?

Is there a book of the 18th century (original source) about this method?

Thanks!

 

 

20gunTartar 1734 годиз книги морскиешлюпки.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by greenstone
Posted

Greenstone  

 

Kudos to you for doing so much research on this subject but it is good to see all the copyrighted material originally posted has been removed.   Based on the previously unedited post you have looked at Mays, Lavery and other sources and have come to the same conclusion as most of us.  There seems to be is no clear contemporary information on stowage of ships boats when there is more than one, which would always have been the case on the actual ship in the 17th-19th century British sailing ships.   One of the items you did post earlier showed and stated that the boats were nested.   Can you tell us this source?   As Lavery points out in The Arming and Fitting,  that would be impossible as the boats always had at least some thwarts that were fixed in place and kneed so it would be impossible to nest them.

 

I am once again in a situation where I could use some contemporary information on how to stow two or more boats on a deck of ships with fewer than 40 guns.

 

FYI, the photo from the W.E. Mays book that you  show in your edited post is no longer available on the RMG site from what I could find, but there are better photos, in color, of this same vessel on their site that might help.   The ones on the website are the normal low res but there may be good information to be seen on the high resolution versions of these nine photos.    https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-66189

 

Thanks for bringing up this subject!!

 

Allan

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLEASE take 30 SECONDS and sign up for the epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series.   Click on http://trafalgar.tv   There is no cost other than the 30 seconds of your time.  THANK YOU

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, allanyed said:

   One of the items you did post earlier showed and stated that the boats were nested.   Can you tell us this source?   As Lavery points out in The Arming and Fitting,  that would be impossible as the boats always had at least some thwarts that were fixed in place and kneed so it would be impossible to nest them.

 

Hello, Allan!

 

This source is "Seamanship in the Age of Sail  An Account of the Shiphandling of the Sailing Man-Of-War, 1600-1860" by John Harland

As far as I know, it was a common practice when one boat was placed in another.

I have seen drawings in the archive and met a description in the literature.

 

 

I think the models in NMM showed only one boat on top of two topmast for simplification. 

There was always a lot of reserve spars on the ship (topmasts, topgallant masts, yards,  topsail yards).

And smaller boats (cutter and yawls) would also be put on them as Marquardt showed according to Captain Cook's description.

The source is "Anatomy of the Ship: Captain Cook's ENDEAVOUR" by Karl Heinz Marquardt.

 

But they didn't show so much on the models. I think so.

I continue to look for a reliable source from the 18th century, where we can read about this in detail.

 

Eugen,

"Master Korabel"

 

Edited by greenstone
adding
Posted

I think for "nesting" they used a cradle (one piece forward and one aft) in the larger boat and the smaller sat on top of it.  I'll have to do some digging in  my library to find out where I read tha.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Posted

Specifications for Mid Nineteenth US Navy launches and cutters are quite specific in requiring that all thwarts be removable to allow nesting of smaller boats.  Photos of these boats show that stern sheets and bottom boards were also fitted with removable “boat shaped” inserts to further allow nesting.

 

The ends of the thwarts were reinforced with iron plates and iron pins slipped through drilled holes into metal flanges fastened to the clamps when the thwarts were put in place.

 

For example see:  The Kedge Anchor, William Brady, 1849, Article No. 519

 

Roger

 

Posted

Roger,  Sounds like the US figured it out, albeit the next century😀.   Eugen is specific about the RN in the 18th century and unfortunately  the boats could not be nested as at least some thwarts were no removable. 

 

Eugen,

 

Mays and Lavery go into theory on how the boats were stowed before the advent of cross beams on ships of 40 guns and larger about 1750 .  They seem to agree that there is no contemporary information that they could find on how the boats were stowed  prior to about 1750 on any size vessel or ships smaller than 40 guns even after 1750.   Interference with the capstan operation, gun operation, and hatches are all taken into account in the theorizing.  Stacking seems to be the consensus, but based only on it being a less troublesome method than any other.  Perhaps Harland was using the term "nesting" loosely and really meant stacking.   

 

I did a bit more searching on the new RMG site with no success so far.  Has anyone noticed the "Collections" system has had a major change?  I am not sure I like the new system or old system better.  The pictures on the new site seem to be as clear even though low resolution, and  can be made larger than the old system without downloading so I am not sure if I like the old search system or new one better.   (I find change in general annoying as I get older🙃)

 

I really hope some solid contemporary information will be brought forward here.

 

Allan

 

 

PLEASE take 30 SECONDS and sign up for the epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series.   Click on http://trafalgar.tv   There is no cost other than the 30 seconds of your time.  THANK YOU

 

Posted

Eugen,

Yes, that looks like how the US did it per the note from Roger above, but in the 18th century, some of the thwarts were fixed with knees so this nesting would not work.  MAYBE one smaller boat could have been stowed upside down on top of a larger boat, but when there were three or more boats, this would not work.   Nesting definitely would be a sensible solution IF the thwarts were removable, but they were not in the earlier years.    Looking at paintings by Van de Velde, et al,  I could not find any answers at all.  Not one model in Anderson's Navy Board Ship Models has a ship's boat so no answers there either.  Looking at photos of models at Preble Hall, same situation, no ship's boats on the models for which I have photos.    

 

Gallows would work for one boat but not two or more.   Even with this, many of the contemporary models do not even show gallows on which a boat could be stowed so it did not interfere with the capstan.  

 

The more I research this, this more I wonder how this was done on the ships under 40 guns and all ships prior to about 1750 when there were not gangways and cross beams.

 

Oh to have a Way Back machine for a few days........  

 

Allan  

PLEASE take 30 SECONDS and sign up for the epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series.   Click on http://trafalgar.tv   There is no cost other than the 30 seconds of your time.  THANK YOU

 

Posted

I'm building The Vanguard  and was thinking about adding 'spare spars and mast parts on deck just to add yet more detail/clutter :) ---- so any pictures I can reference would be fab..

 

HMAV Bounty 'Billings' completed  

HMS Cheerful - Syren-Chuck' completed :)

Steam Pinnace 199 'Billings bashed' - completed

HMS Ledbury F30 --White Ensign -completed 😎

HMS Vanguard 'Victory models'-- completed :)

Bismarck Amati 1/200 --underway  👍


 

 

 

Posted

Ian

Eugen is looking for information on stowing boats rather than spars which would likely have been laid on the cross beams along with the boats on a 74 of 1787.    As to photographs or other contemporary information, if you find any, that would be an interesting subject to start.    I found two photos of contemporary models in the Rogers collection at Preble Hall that follow.   Not sure these are contemporary pieces or if they were added to the models at some later date.

Allan

DSC01199.thumb.JPG.5584d12eaab767ba8dab682dd77e005d.JPG

Waist.thumb.jpg.dd8b9a2d94a998ecc1f7c57d00b4a434.jpg

 

 

PLEASE take 30 SECONDS and sign up for the epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series.   Click on http://trafalgar.tv   There is no cost other than the 30 seconds of your time.  THANK YOU

 

Posted

Thanks, I think I will start a new thread. :)

 

 

 

HMAV Bounty 'Billings' completed  

HMS Cheerful - Syren-Chuck' completed :)

Steam Pinnace 199 'Billings bashed' - completed

HMS Ledbury F30 --White Ensign -completed 😎

HMS Vanguard 'Victory models'-- completed :)

Bismarck Amati 1/200 --underway  👍


 

 

 

Posted

Hi Ian,

I recall seeing something along these lines on a thread a few weeks ago here at MSW.  Not sure it was ever resolved. Opinions regarding storing these pieces on the decks, cross beams and even on the channels were proposed.   

 

Allan

PLEASE take 30 SECONDS and sign up for the epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series.   Click on http://trafalgar.tv   There is no cost other than the 30 seconds of your time.  THANK YOU

 

Posted

It certainly was usual to store spare spars (often topmasts) on the skid beams in the waist as seen in your photographs, so these were most likely contemporary with the models themselves. Other contemporary models show at least one boat stowed on the spare spars, but exactly how they were secured I'm unsure. 

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Posted

But returning to the question raised.

This drawing from 1759 perfectly shows two boats.

One is on the deck (only fragments are visible) and the second boat from above is located on the topmasts.

It is very well shown how exactly the boat is attached.

 

Deutsch_ Frederik den Femtes Atlas

Segelplan, Seitenansicht Fregatte Sjöridderen

 

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soeridderen.jpg

 

1759- Segelplan, Seitenansicht Fregatte Sjöridderen.JPG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...