Chuck

It looks pretty good. But dont forget to bevel the edges of each strake so they fit really snug up against the strakes already on the hull. You can just knock of the corner of the back edge for the most part.

In this instance its Windsor and Newton Galleria acrylic paint. Yes it is thinned down quite a bit and put on in many layers like watercolor. The color is Crimson straight out of the tube. I have used dozens of coats of very thin washes until it becomes opaque. That helps me keep the paint very flat and without paint brush stokes using a round brush. Chuck

What is a stanley blade??? Pictures maybe

Michael, I am using Grumbacher acrylic paints in a tube. Specifically Mars Black. I finished the boom today and its all rigged. It was shaped the same way as the mast. I started with square stock and used the 7/10/7 ratio to convert to an octagon. Then I used my drill to round it off and put the taper on it. The jaws were added after I flattened the sides to accept them. The blocks were prepared in advance, meaning some were added to the boom ahead of time. Other blocks were secured to the mast and horse for sheets. Then it was just a matter of rigging it in place. I have only tightened the ropes around the cleats without any glue. I will leave it this way until after the standing rigging is completed in case I have to re-tension the lines. But from the way it looks I think it will be OK. For the trucks on the jaws to secure the boom to the mast, I used what I found in the shop. I had some boxwood beads laying around that were the perfect size....I might even have enough left over to give the remainder to Mike for his model. Here are some pics. Next up will be the gaff.

I have a couple of those...just havent tried them yet. I am still hoping we will get some folks that will try shaping these pieces with a rotaary tool....it would be nice to have a comparison. Also You guys are free to carve any design and start a log here as long as it is for ship model related items. Carving with any tool is very different when you are working at these scales and it is a very different experience than carving full size or even double the size of these blanks. I know we have a lot of traditional wood carvers out there and once you try carving something as small as these you will see how differently you must approach it. So feel free to carve anything you like....just no folk art old men with a cane....that stuff is not relevant to carving items meant for a ship model at 3/16" or even a 1/4" scale. But if you have a trailboard or another design you want to carve for your ship model...feel free to start a log and get some input from the others. I am very happy to see more logs being started...thanks for the interest. I am also thinking about starting another area on sculpting using polymer clay for those who wish to try that medium to make more complex designs or even the same ones we are doing here. Just have to find the time to start that one up. And I will do so if you guys think there is sufficient interest in it. I am trying to develop this area more so it covers many aspects for creating the decorative elements for a ship model.....whether they are carved or sculpted. Chuck

Very well done!!!

I plan to...hopefully the gaff and boom will be rigged by then.

Mike That is looking very nice. Cant wait to see it in person. Chuck

Make a card template or paper version first. Then after it fits....trace it onto a strip or sheet and cut it out.

Thats looking great....the garboard ends just a hair past the scarf joint. I hope this picture helps.

One hand holding the drill.....the other has sand paper curled up and thats the hand you use to stabilize it. As you are running the folded paper back and forth you are keeping the stick from vibrating. Its much easier to do than it is to visualize.

Thank You so much guys. Today I finished the topmast. Its all painted and the entire mast is now completed. Rather than start on the standing rigging with the pendants, shrouds and stays....I will be building the boom and gaff first. On this model it will be much easier to rig the finished gaff and boom first before tackling the shrouds and stays. This way I wont have to reach behind the standing rigging to rig them. Especially the where the rigging is close to the lower mast at deck level.

Beautiful work. It is so nice to see you back working on the model. Well Done!!!

I figured the same Dan. The lower mast has been completed and I am now working on the topmast. To begin, I started with square boxwood stock. Then I squared up and tapered the top according to the plans using some chisels and sanding sticks. But before doing that I drilled the holes for the sheave as you can see. Once the top portion was squared off and tapered I finished up the sheave by rounding it off and cleaning it up. You can also see the 7/10/7 ratio applied to the lower mast. I am about to chisel it to an octagon in preparation for rounding it off. The entire mast was left a bit long so I have some extra to chock it in my hand drill. It was chocked and rounded off with some sandpaper. I also carefull added the taper to the rounded portion while sanding it. Then the boom rest was fabricated from a washer of boxwood 3/32" thick. Just like the mast coat it was shaped with its profile using needle files and sanding sticks. It was cut in half and then the small chocks were added around the perimeter after it was glued into position. I still have to add the cleats around the base of the lower mast as well. I made sure to make the mast hoops using the mini-kits from Syren and slip those on the mast before adding the trestle tree permanently. I was afraid that I would forget but I didnt. The trees were crafted from boxwood using the plans as a guide. It was pretty straight forward except for the fact that it must be angled properly on the mast. Once the cheeks were shaped and glued to the mast the proper angle for the trees was filed into the mast. The mast is angled or raked aft and the trees must remain parallel to the deck. So considerable time was used to establish the correct angle. Finally the cleats were added and the lower portion painted red. Then the masthead area from the bottom of the cheeks upwards was painted black. That was done after adding the mast bands and eyebolts. These will be used for the boom and gaff rigging later.

Great to see you in the shop Ryland....hope you are doing well. Enjoy the carving. One thing I did was draw in on the blank where all of my stop cuts were going to go before I started carving.

No fair....for you its just like cutting out a gall bladder. You must do that that ten times a week. But seriously, that looks very good I hope you had fun with it. I am curious how folks will think about the removal process. Dunk it in some alcohol and give it a go.

That looks very good.....lovely work. I was indeed hoping more would join in. Many carving blanks were sold yet nobody is joining in on the fun.... Hope to see more folks starting up soon.

Nothing other than gluing them to the base before carving.

Make sure you just give those vulnerable area a gently poke to make sure they are glued down good. Chuck

I have no idea....but either the six pounders as I have used or smaller would work. But even the smaller 3 pounders would be hairy to work in such a confined space. Either way we know they were there its just we have no idea how they handled them. I am pretty confident in going with the six pounders as indicated on the draft itself...I will however leave it up to the imagination as to how they were worked. Chuck

Here is what the six pounders look like rigged....... Those wishing to replace and use the smaller 3 pounder barrels just remember that the carriages will need to be reworked. They will need to be made the same height but reduced in length.

Thanks.....so my 1 11/64" barrels would be a great fit for those wishing to go with a 3 pounder gun instead. I am going to leave it as is however based on the notation on the draft. Plus its already completely rigged. Next up I will start making the lower mast. Thanks Druxey

I do agree with that Druxey 100%. Please help me with some math..... In fact, lets assume that as documented on the original draft that six pounders were used as chase guns. Based on my research, a short six pounder was around 6 feet long. At 1:48 scale that would be 1 1/2" long. The cannon on my model are actually 1 29/64" long or slightly shorter than the historical norm for a short 6'. So basically they are right on the money so-to-speak. So what you are looking at on my model is representative of a short six pounder if my math is correct. I could have gone shorter but that wouldnt bear out with the info I have on ordinance fro the time period. Not that this helps with the way they appear on the model.... But these guns are the size of short six pounder cannon 6' long. Have I made a math error though???? Math wasnt exactly my strong-suit. I also considered going with my 1 11/64" barrels but they are closer to 4 pounders and very small for the scale. So this was my thinking when deciding to go with this size barrel and the only thing I can think of is that my assumption of a six foot long short six is wrong. Can someone confirm that 6' long is an accurate premise for a short six pounder at this time? I am using several sources for this info Arming and fitting.....Goodwin Ship of the line.....Lavery Volume II of Swan series....Antscherl

In light of the overwhelming contemporary evidence I cant really ignore it on my model. There most certainly were no port lids. Rather than just speculate based on a gut feeling its better to leave all possibilities open for individual consideration. But for my model I will rig them as bow chasers as stated on the original draft. Image below. Now one other possibility would be to go with a smaller 6 pounder cannon but correspondence from the period and written accounts from her time at sea also indicate they were actually 12 pounders. My guns are 1 29/64" long or the size of short six pounders at this scale. I think either size would have little impact on how functional they would be just looking at them 225 years later crammed into that tiny space, but I would rather think that the methods that made them useful are just not known to us at this time. That it would be wrong to simply ignore all of the contemporary accounts and evidence because we just have a gut feeling. But that doesnt mean that others building Cheerful cant come to a different conclusion. Hopefully it will be based on actual contemporary information and research however rather than just a casual impression based on current limited impressions and generalities. Just my thoughts on it. So I will finish up the rigging and just move ahead to constructing the lower mast. I do appreciate and find the discussion fascinating none the less. Chuck

Indeed you are correct. These barrels are in fact the length of short sixes. I just cant figure it out. If you look at the contemporary model the same problem exists although loading would not be an issue because its a carronade on the one pictured. Rather than sit it on it and over contemplate I am just going to rig them as bow chasers. I am sure that additional info will come to light soon after but I hate to ignore contemporary sources. They must have known something we dont. Even six pounders with a barrel about 3/32" - 1/8" shorter would be problematic. ....at least to us 225 years later anyway. Chuck