Jump to content

rshousha

Members
  • Posts

    431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

5 Followers

About rshousha

  • Birthday 05/21/1959

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.modellers-workshop.com
  • Skype
    rick.shousha

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Montreal, Canada
  • Interests
    3D CAD drawings, helping people choose the right model and tools.

Recent Profile Visitors

3,335 profile views
  1. Great job with this model. I sure wish I could participate more but I can no longer do so. Good luck to you. Best Regards, Rick
  2. Wonderful! Here is where the CNC work is shining through. This is the way it should be done. I'm glad you haven't sent the frames above the level of the deck. Once the hull is planked, she'll have to look like she has steel frames; lots of soldering!
  3. Here is the latest project I am working on. This is a 48" tug. Plywood is 1/4" birch. The hull was done in Rhino. The rest is SW.
  4. Wow, that's amazing. I just bought a Rhino license, but I have asked a fellow in Ontario to make the organic shapes for me. He's very good and I am sure he can use the features you are mentioning. I will have to talk to him about it. I use Solidworks and I am a bit tired of the $2000 USD annual maintenance fee. The software is really good but I don't use it enough to warrant the cost. I may buy the license for 2025, but that will be my last one. For now, I use a combination of Rhino, to create the organic shapes, and SW, to create all the internal parts, and make the 2D drawings. I suspect, from looking at your work, that Rhino can deal with the work just as well as Solidworks, for a quarter of the cost.
  5. I am looking forward to seeing the fit of the deck. I use pretty good software and can't make my deck conform to curves front-to-back as well as side-to-side. I use sheet metal fabrication to make the curved surfaces and those can only be "flattened" the way they would be with real steel. I do not have "stamping" software that is found in the high-end CAD solutions like Catia. It looks like you have some real experience with CAD.
  6. Nice-looking parts! Going back to the laser-vs-CNC question, these parts look so much more "finished" than anything that could come off a laser. It just takes a tiny bit of cleaning and the parts are pristine. The inside corners of the windows might not be square, like what you come out of a laser, but that is easily rectified with a quick pass of a file. And any work that you do with a file is directly related to cleaning or adjusting the part. It is not related to simply getting the char off in order to get glue to work well.
  7. My company builds frame sets for large-scale R/C boats. We have been making frame sets since 2015 and have always used a laser. When I visited my supplier, Jotika, a couple of years ago, I spent a few hours with John Wright, the owner, and he really opened my eyes about the difference between a laser and a CNC cutter. There is no doubt, for many reasons, that the CNC does a much better job. First, the precision is much higher with the CNC machine. As long as you measure your drill bit and your material, you can get more precision that with the laser. Even you account for the kerf on the laser, and you measure your material, you still have a char on the laser-cut parts. That char needs to be removed or the glue doesn't penetrate the material. Second, you can make pockets with a CNC. For example, you can make parts fit without passing all the way through. Also, with pockets, you can do things like "engrave" windows in the stern panels of models. In your case, you might find that quite interesting for your model. That cannot be done with a laser-cutter. I spent about a year using a full-size CNC machine at a furniture-maker, designing furniture, and then actually using the machine and making the prototypes myself. It was great fun and taught me a lot about woodworking. So, as soon as I can find someone around here that has a decent CNC machine, I will start designing for that. I suspect the price of my frame sets will go up slightly but, when people are paying many thousands of dollars to build a big R/C model, I think they will appreciate the improvement in quality. (By the way, I am planning on building the Cutty Sark myself, in 1/48 but, hey, your model might be even more fun to do!) In brackets because I do not want to market a kit in 1/40 scale. It just isn't part of the large scales that I use. Best Regards, Rick
  8. Very nice to see you are working on a CNC and not laser-cutting. CNC is so much more precise. Well done! I will follow this. Nice CAD work, as well.
  9. I painted the hull, as well, and ended up using that thin mahogany for a zillion other models. For example, it worked beautifully as the outside surface of a large model of a stagecoach.
  10. Where were all these extra spars stored? That's another forest they had to carry.
  11. Hi Snug Harbor Johnny, You make an interesting point about the lack of carvings, etc. I see what you mean. Still, I doubt the company expected to sell many of those kits so the price may have been a little higher than you mention because of that but I am sure your price estimate is pretty close. I had no idea you were so interested in this period. This model will surely be a prized display among your friends! I am looking forward to seeing the construction develop. Cheers, Rick
  12. Geez, this sure is an interesting find. How much do you think this was worth back in the 70s?
  13. Hello All! So Johnny Snug Harbour has decided to buy the Henri Grace-a-Dieu kit I had in stock. Actually, it's a good thing he bought it because it really is the most amazing kit I have ever seen, with almost 200 cannons and zillions and zillions of small parts. I had decided to keep for myself. I just love those period ships and there are very few kits out there. So, Bounty is still for sale.
×
×
  • Create New...