Jump to content

Ferrus Manus

Members
  • Posts

    1,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ferrus Manus

  1. Or maybe, the extant shipwrecks simply show the keel having bent under the stress of almost a thousand years of existence. It could be a common deformation of the wood as it gets eroded away and buried in silt and dirt.
  2. Stay here for a bit, Steven. The main course's heavy lines are rigged. The lighter lines (buntlines, martnets, bowlines) come next.
  3. The next task is to rig the sheets and tacks, before belaying the clews and finally, the buntlines, martnets, and bowlines.
  4. Then, after that, i rigged the lanyard to the knighthead, and made up the block and tackle, raising the yard into its position. I also i did the braces for the yard. I also did the tackles for the parrel, which are the two sets of double blocks on the deck. They fall to a pair of cleats on the mast.
  5. So, today i got the fore course mounted to the mast. First, i tied the halyard at one point to the yard. Then, i threaded the halyard through one of the sheaves in the side of the mast, and held it in place. It was at this point that i began prep for the parrel. I threaded the halyard through the violin block and back through the second sheave in the mast, before tying it back to the yard. More in the next few minutes.
  6. Yes, the rigging plan is accurate. And yes, the sails should be rigged before being hoisted.
  7. I did more prep for the fore course. The mainstay tackle is complete, in its stored position at the base of the foremast.
  8. @woodrat @Louie da fly Let's settle this argument once and for all. Yes, you already know what i'm talking about. For those unaware, there is a debate between Dick and Steven concerning the bowsprit grapnels common on carracks of around this time. Steven believes they only existed on warships, to serve the purpose of dropping on top of another ship to hold her in place for boarding, while Dick believes they existed as sort of an auxiliary anchor. Now, gather round and listen to my ramblings... These two naves are clearly warships, as they possess both anti-boarding nets and gads on the fighting tops (gads are large javelins meant to be thrown onto enemy sailors). They also both have the characteristic grapnel hanging from the bowsprit. Now, i tend to fall on the side of Steven in this debate. However, the true answer is likely more nuanced than that. In the medieval period, all the way up until the Renaissance, most if not all painters of nautical scenes did not care much about perfect realism in their artworks. Instead, they wanted to portray the idea of "ship", and they certainly did not imagine that almost six hundred years later, historians would use their artworks to piece together the functional details of an entire type of vessel that no longer exists. That being said, when a young artist in the medieval period first saw a carrack, the awe-inspiring image would certainly be burned into his memory. Were that a military vessel, it would have had a grapnel. This, to the young artist, would have been one of the most striking features of such a vessel, and, not being a sailor himself, would not have known the difference. Then, throughout his career, when asked to paint a carrack, he would likely call upon this memory like it was yesterday, and he certainly would not forget the spiky metal bit hanging off the bowsprit.
  9. I love how this one little ship facilitated the most underrated, history-altering heist in world history.
  10. I attached the blocks to and around the forestay collar. The larger single blocks will be for the course topping lifts, the smaller ones for the martnets, and the double blocks will accept the buntlines. This same system of blocks will also be added on the main.
  11. Thanks, all! I plan to become a historian, working as an archaeologist or in a museum, using my knowledge of history and ships to great length The history of the world is a history of ships, shipbuilding, and sailing, and it deserves to be learned about. Also, i went and got thin diameter thread today, so the build can progress.
  12. I am getting the fore course yard ready to be hoisted up on the foremast. I installed the clewlines, and i decided against using real parrels. I made this executive decision because a true parrel would not fit in the space provided, look out of scale, and clutter things up at the top of the mast. So, i settled for a reasonable alternative, which was the system used for the spritsail yard. Now, before i hoist the yard, i first need to get some things done to facilitate that. I need to install the mainstay tackle, as well as the forward foremast tackles inside the shrouds. Anyway, i made a custom violin block out of card, for the halyard on the fore course. I have yet to paint it. I will make another one, slightly larger, for the main course. For the mizzen and bonaventure lateens, i will simply use a double block.
  13. Oh man, what a mess. That's Heller's fault for not adding locator pins. Your fix looks perfectly convincing, no more alterations needed. The beakhead really comes together with the side rails added.
  14. I am using your work as an example of what to do, to someone who is building a ship from a similar time period. I am attempting to find similar build logs made by experts (yourself) to illustrate rigging concepts for my friend, who has never rigged a model ship. Personally, i think your work is top-notch, and i can only aspire to reach similar heights.
  15. @Bill97 i own the book as well, and it has saved my life on many occasions. I have yet to buy the Anderson volume.
×
×
  • Create New...