-
Posts
2,307 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by JSGerson
-
In order to rig the topsail yards lifts and halyards I had to first install double 3 mm blocks from the crosstrees (which should have been installed earlier, etc. but I’m repeating myself…again). BTY: When constructing the cross trees, both the Hunt practicum and the MS plans showed two “wings.” Those are the supports perpendicular to the beam of the ship. However, Mamoli ‘s plan showed two and three wings depending on which sheet of the plans you were looking at. I only noticed it now!!??
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Topsail yards Before any more rigging could be installed to the Main yards, the Topsail yards had to be hung next. They were installed also in the same manner as the main yards but with a few differences. The Mains had two heavy lines through blocks each to suspend the yards. They also had lines wrapped around the yards to hold them against the masts which were tied down at the deck. The topsail yards were held with a single line that went through the mast and split into separate lines that went to the side rails through a series of blocks. To hold the yard against the masts, the Mamoli kit just looped rope around the yard and mast and lashed to ends together. The MS kit plans showed parrels. According to David Antscherl, the parrel ribs are 14” long or 5.5 mm at 1/64 scale. I chose to go with the parrels and used the 6 mm parrels (close enough) sold by Amati.
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Mainsail Yard Lifts My first thought was to install the cross jack yard next and work my way forward to the main and fore masts installing their topsail yards. But checking the plans I decided to install the mainsail yard lifts first. Starting at the main mast, the 3 mm blocks that should have been installed when the masts were being assembled (am I being repetitive?), needed to be installed on the mast cap. They were a bit awkward to do, but they got done. The lift line went from the cap block just installed to the top block of the double blocks at the tip of the yard, back through the cap block and down to, through, and tied off at a kevel. The only problem - no kevels were installed in the location indicated on the plans. Back when I was following Bob Hunt’s practicum exclusively, he stated there were 8 kevels that needed to be made and installed. I did as he instructed, but he was wrong, there were 10. The missing kevels (Mamoli No. 121A port and starboard) located at the start of the aft upper deck had to be put in now. Not only that, but the Mamoli plan No 8 has an error – the diagram showing the front view of the main mast has the lift line going to kevel No. 89A instead of No. 121A. Kevel 89A is for the foremast. Making the kevels was no problem, installing them was quite another. Due to their location; I needed a pair of right angled tweezers due to the interference of the stays, ratlines and the inward lean of the bulwarks. Not like forceps, but more like a “Monkey” (Spanner) wrench concept. The closest I found is sold by Micro Mark. But even if I did have this instrument, I don’t think it would have done what I wanted in this situation. MicroMark Ear Polypus My first attempt resulted in disaster as I dropped the kevel and it fell into the bowels of the model never to be seen again due to the model’s open planking. Another kevel was made. My first attempt was made with CA glue which required a good flush contact immediately. That didn’t happen. My second attempt, I used PVA glue which allowed me to adjust the position once I made initial contact with the bulwark. The second kevel was installed was just as tricky but without incident. What really kills me is that I knew the kevels were missing for quite some time and could have installed them earlier and possible made my life a bit easier. I knew because while reading someone else’s Rattlesnake build log (forgive me, I’ve forgotten whose it was) this very problem was discussed. I failed to act on it quickly and it slipped my mind. The fore mast main yard and Cross jack were installed very similar. In hindsight, I could have hung the Crossjack first without any problems.
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Since you are working on the hammock netting, here are two US Navy plans for the frame forgings. Jon 013-09-2009 - Forged Hammock Net Frame.pdf 19043001 - Hammock Stowagw Forgings.pdf
- 1,348 replies
-
- constitution
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That is some fancy display box! So now the question is: where are you going to display the model? I'm not thinking so much as in what room, but what does the box sit on to display the model? I've been wrestling with this problem in contemplation of the completion of my Rattlesnake. Jon
- 277 replies
-
- model shipways
- 18th century longboat
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Always a pleasure to read your build log. You mentioned you "used a technique described by Steve Wheeler in the January/February 2009 issue of Ships in Scale." I bought the CD archive of Ships n Scale and thought I was in luck because it goes as recent as 2009. Unfortunately I could not find the article you referenced. I searched the keyword oars and got zip. Searching for Steve Wheeler generated a lot of articles, but nothing stood out as the article on oars. Could it be hidden in some article on a different subject with a side reference to oars? Jon
- 277 replies
-
- model shipways
- 18th century longboat
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Let me start out by saying I have images for over fifty different models and build logs of the USS Constitution. I am collecting them to help me when I start my model (when ever that may be). I checked every one of them and for those which showed a clear image of the skylight, you sir, have made the best. I found only two other builders with whom I would even consider a near second or third place. You out shined them all. Jon
-
If I knew then what I know now, a better choice would be to thread the blocks as soon as the blocks were installed and have them coiled up with a clip until it's time to actually rig the lines. I was/am trying to work by the rule of rigging from the inside and working my way outward and from bottom to top somewhat in the manner of how the actual ship would be rigged. Others opt to build the masts and their associated rigging as much as possible off the model. Each method has its pros and cons. In this case, pre-rigging the blocks would have been better. Jon
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well the fore main yard has now been hung. It actually took me less time than the main yard but I was set back first, by breaking off the starboard fore castle stair railing from the waist. Not only was it knocked off, but I somehow lost the upper stanchion which obviously had to be refabricated. Second, by somehow catching the bowsprit yard haul-in block that is attached to the top of the fore stay. It got pull off which meant I had to tie back on. I thought it would be a cinch (pun intended). But like we all know, Murphy rules: it’s never as easy as it looks. The problems were the usual: confined space to work in, not enough fingers, fingers are too big, etc. Here is what she looks like now. Please note there are still a LOT of final tie offs to be done, gun ports to repair, etc.
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Antscherl's method is: "...once released from the serving machine, cut the ends on a long diagonal...Glue the ends..." The problem I had was cutting the ends. If done exactly as described, the serving is cut and begins to unravel. Here is his method from a handout he passed out during a demonstration he gave at a past NRG Conference. It adds a few more details. BTY, Blue Ensign's method (the one that I could find) is for eye splices, not line splices. Jon
- 481 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I didn't double-up my bobstay. I didn't know at the time I rigged it that it should have been because both the Mamoli and the MS plans did not show it that way. You did good. According to Jame Lees' The Masting and Rigging of English Ships of War the splice (which needs to be made on the model) lay in the grove of the heart (or deadeye). You placed it in the stem, but it won't matter except for the purest because in either case it will be hidden. I don't know how you made your splice, but when I have to make them, I unravel the two ends, butt them together so that the loose strands overlap and lie on the other's end. I then apply some diluted PVC glue and hold with my fingers until nothing comes apart when I let go. I've have problems of them coming apart if the dilution is too thin. In this case because the line is served, I would leave a length of serving thread to continue the wrap around the splice which also gives it physical strength. Nice work Jon
- 481 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ah yes, Cast Your Anchor. I've dealt with them before, but it's been a while. I'll have to check in with them more often. Thanks for your quick reply. Jon
- 117 replies
-
- constitution
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Very lovely, clean looking, hull. A word of caution: DO NOT smash a bottle of champagne on the hull during your launch party. 8-) Jon
- 481 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Out of curiosity, what was your source for the #75 nails? Jon
- 117 replies
-
- constitution
- model shipways
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The new block positions left very little wiggle room for rigging and that was before all of the other factors were considered: Getting underneath the fighting tops just to look at the blocks on the underside was difficult Actually seeing the rigging holes in the blocks very difficult When they could be seen, the blocks were not necessarily angled such that the rigging holes were facing in a direction to optimize rigging Confined working space due to interference with other lines Use of headset magnifiers and eyeglass clip-ons magnifiers reduced depth of field to zero – I couldn’t tell what was in front or behind of what. I was constantly grabbing for things with my tweezers that weren’t where I thought they were and running into rigging the was blurred so strongly, they were invisible Because of the magnifiers, the working distance was reduced and getting one’s face and hand close enough for focal range of the magnifiers was deterred by existing rigging If I could hold the rigging line in a pair of tweezers to try to rig the block, I could not brace my hand on anything to steady it If I could actually get the line to the block, the block could move at the slightest touch because it was just hanging there without support It took a lot of concentration, patience, and tenacity sometimes taking anywhere from 5 minutes to two hours just to rig one block. There are six blocks on either side of the mast for a total of 12 blocks per mast and there are two masts to rig this way. .I had to stop after no more than two hours, successful or not. Surprisingly, if the stars and the planets lined up just so, and if good fortune smiled at me, the rigging line slipped right through the block. However, some of the block rigging was faked by wrapping the line that was supposed to go through the block, around the block tie used to connect it to the fighting top. It’s not what I wanted to do, but it was all I could do. Lucky one would be hard pressed to see my cheats. Just recently, Blue Ensign, a highly regarded builder posting here on ModelShipWorld.com, showed an image of his Pegasus foremast top blocks. I noticed his blocks hung a bit lower than mine which probably makes rigging them much easier. I wish I had known that a year ago. Once the lines passed through the blocks, they were terminated at the pin rail on the forecastle with some GS Hypo fabric glue. Since more lines have to be installed on the main yard, I was afraid they may affect the tensioning on these lines. The fabric glue can be easily removed to re-tension if necessary. Once I feel confident that the lines are properly set, I will add the rope coils to the pin rails. Now I have to do it again for the fore main yard.
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Now came the part I’ve been dreading ever since I installed them last year – rigging the blocks under the Main and Foremast fighting tops. If you may remember, I decided to rig crow’s feet because it was shown on the Harold Hahn plans and it looked like an interesting project. Neither Model Shipways nor Mamoli showed it in their plans. As a result of creating the crow’s feet, the blocks which were tied to the edges of the top in the kits’ plans had to be move to the underside of the top platforms.
- 973 replies
-
- rattlesnake
- mamoli
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I was just checking my PMs and noticed that the last PM I replied to your request last month was rejected and returned to me again as: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain modelshipworld.com bymail.modelshipworld.com. [205.234.253.68]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 No Such User Here I had made three attempted replys to your PM, but did not see the last rejection until now. If you could provide me with an alternate email address, I will re-attempt to send you the info you requested. Jon
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.