-
Posts
1,433 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by Kevin Kenny
-
-
An interview with Michael
- giampieroricci, PaddyO, gsdpic and 6 others
-
9
-
-
-
-
So we don't go over a well worn discussion. Here is the link to the previous one.
- mort stoll, Ryland Craze, KentM and 1 other
-
4
-
-
I found this on earlier post on the forum.Checking on Ai it came up with the same reasoning. So i will stick with the red.
“ The following is more likely the reason. Deck furniture, bulwarks, etc, were red ochre. This was discussed in an earlier post here at MSW in 2021 and it was mentioned that this was for protection from the weather and ochre (earth) colors were inexpensive. In addition, after long sea voyages and during repairs it was also refreshed. The idea that it would hide blood was coincidental, not the reason it was most often red. There are a number of contemporary models where much of the inboard works were painted black. I have no idea if this was original or done at some later time. The Navy Board stated 18 July 1715 that painting (presumably outboard and inboard) was "not to refresh oftener than once a year or two and the inboard works that are from the weather." There is no mention of a particular color or hiding blood. The actual usefulness in protecting the wood from rot and the cost would probably be a bigger concern to the navy than the mental state of the sailors in the age of sail. If you are next to a man that has had some part of his body ripped off, I doubt hiding the blood on a bulwark would make it any easier to avoid fear, panic or the onset PTSD.
Allan
Edited May 28, 2023 by allanyed”
- druxey, scrubbyj427, dvm27 and 3 others
-
6
-
- druxey, PaddyO, KARAVOKIRIS and 5 others
-
8
-
- mort stoll, dvm27, KentM and 5 others
-
8
-
excellent video on boilers
- kurtvd19 and thibaultron
-
1
-
1
-
Hi Alan
the recoil from the cannon would push it all the way back to the end of the breeching line. After which the gun would be reloaded and i feel will need both port or gun tackles to get it back to its firing position. Also pulling on one side of the gun tackle may cause the gun to move to one side. So my guess is that they pulled both sides together. The train tackle was probably only needed when starting the firing sequence.
i also found how the port tackle was flayed. Photograph attached. So they did not coil the side tackles but instead tied it on itself as i did with my guns. These storage solutions for the various tackles would only be used when the cannon was not in use. When in use rope would be all over the place just like it is in a modern racing boat. The tackles would also be tight when the cannon is not in use to prevent ut moving around.
i also found a short video which may be useful to those who never knew how the cannons were used in battle.
- jpalmer1970, KentM, yvesvidal and 1 other
-
4
-
-
-
Chris that’s just a template. That’s not the finished piece. I haven’t started working on that as yet
- KentM, ccoyle, Ryland Craze and 3 others
-
6
-
- druxey, KentM, Ryland Craze and 4 others
-
7
-
-
What a number of the videos and modelers notes seem to indicate is that no one knows what is on the brass and different solvents will affect different contaminants on the pieces. I have acetone and should have mentioned it. Certainly the best results was pickling the pieces. Based on my soldering experience this has never disappointed me. You are right about blackening the photo etched pieces still connected to the frame. I actually used a stiff paint brush with the solvents and could see something coming off in the solution. My choice would be to prickle the pieces, rinse, then blacken. If they did not take then i would try one of the three solvents i have in the shop until i get success. Thanks for the feedback.
-
Yes but its a great way to practice and the only way to get it right.
- AON, KentM, mort stoll and 1 other
-
4
-
You are right and wrong. I wanted to install the cannon back from the gun port. That turned out to be an error as the aft train tackle ended up to close to the eye on the center of the deck. This was caused by the blocks being too long. I have now been able to reduce the hook down to about 5” while in real life it was probably 3” in length. I just cant make it smaller than this and even this method is a bit of a cheat as i had to remove the eye at the end of the hook. It will be better on the port side. In any case this will all be sealed up and no one will be able to see it, just you and me.
- billocrates and KentM
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
I still can’t figure out what my figurehead is supposed to depict . Thorn?????
HMS Thorn by Kevin Kenny - 1:48 scale - Swan-class - David Antscherl practium
in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
Posted
You are very kind