Jump to content

Hubac's Historian

NRG Member
  • Posts

    2,939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hubac's Historian

  1. This all looks great Eric.  I like your aft increase in wale sheer.  I’m debating whether it makes sense to have a corresponding increase in the middle band of wales, as the sheer would have run parallel.  The upper main wales - at the juncture of the upper bulwarks are pretty fixed, although one could add to to top edge of the upper most wale and feather it back.  It mY not really be worth all of that extra effort, though.

  2. Well, the 6th grade CYO basketball season has drawn to a close and our team succeeded beyond my wildest dreams:  we went 13-1, and captured the Manhattan division title.  Our second and final loss came in a division matchup with the Bronx winners.  We played a gritty first half, and kept it close, but made mistakes in the second half.  We were simply overmatched.  Nonetheless, it was a wonderful and extremely rewarding season.  The Knicks, on the other hand, continue to surprise, so my attentions remain somewhat divided.

     

    That being said, I am lately looking to focus more on model building.  I’ve completed all of the fore, main and mizzen channel deadeye strops.  Although Andre Kudin’s particular method is definitely more efficient with less clean-up - he solders the lower strop loop at a neatly cut joint - I stuck with the R.C. Anderson overlap method I had been using because the strops were coming out uniformly, nicely shaped, and strong.  I will change my approach for the deadeye strops in the tops.

    IMG_5203.thumb.jpeg.f8abb251fbf87423c587f3283fb17ec6.jpeg

    Next in order to be made are the chain preventer plates.  One of the key differences between what I had first tried, when making the chain preventer plates, and what Andre does is that Andre bends each plate from an individual length of wire, rather than try to economize on material by wrapping a longer length of wire, many turns, around an appropriately sized former.

     

    When you do the latter, for one thing - you may succeed in crimping the continuous loop neatly around the former, but it is nigh impossible, after parting the links to get the links off the former without pulling them all out of shape.

     

    The other issue with parting the links in this way is that you end up with one neat flush end and a pinched end, which leads to a weaker solder joint.

     

    What I am after are uniformly straight chain links, free of odd kinks, and sloppy joints.  To that end I set up a simple bending jig like the one I see in Andre’s videos.  Following is a series of screen captures from his YouTube videos.  This particular video is either #13 or #16, in the series, if I remember correctly:

    IMG_5790.thumb.png.96ef8990899d619f6d01bacfb4d52a9d.png

    IMG_5791.jpeg.40d7b270d56a33aceea1825bc526bc2d.jpeg

    IMG_5792.jpeg.36c77ee7229e1fefe0ae1cdfe8afc45a.jpeg

    IMG_5794.jpeg.852fc8f656d52a2dc9ab5980b2ea93ae.jpeg

    IMG_5793.jpeg.1725857a2fea01283478c6786259db60.jpeg

    IMG_5795.jpeg.256762e01ab81874fabf6dc81ae3a4e1.jpeg

    And following along, I first pre-bend short lengths of wire around a drill mandrel:

    IMG_5972.jpeg.ed723526ddf41780df92e3f425c19503.jpeg

    I’ve placed a shallow spacer beneath the link area, so that the ends will be slightly raised and easier to crimp with my parallel pliers:

    IMG_5969.jpeg.9e68ce08a7ac130a196cda560059a899.jpeg

    I crimp snug around the upper pin, then use my pliers to pull each end snugly around the lower pin.  I then crimp around the lower pin:

    IMG_5970.jpeg.bfcd69cfb128b39ad9b05a9ad64b0427.jpeg

    I can then remove the link, and flush-cut each side of the link.  A little tweezer/finger manipulation creates a nicely closed link:

    IMG_5971.jpeg.25ae655afc354e1dbaf38ee4d2a9b9c8.jpeg

    Silver solder paste has proven to be really great as I can control its application with the tip of an Exacto.  A touch to the iron, and I have nicely soldered joints that only require a little cleanup:

    IMG_5973.jpeg.f2a8f1ddbe77d656cebadfe90fff0186.jpeg

    Now, Andre puts the soldered loops back over the two-pin jig and uses his round-nose pliers to crimp eyes at each end.  I found, though, that the joints with this 28 gauge wire simply failed when I tried this:

    IMG_5974.jpeg.911646f6870b48d71bf924ff4fdd5b8b.jpeg

    Alternatively, I found that I could place each link end over the lower pin, hold the outer end with a tweezer, and use my round nose plier to crimp around the single pin.  This worked beautifully:

    IMG_5976.jpeg.dd7cb73a58e9d3d2489685cf6b58f4ec.jpeg

    Now, It’s a simple matter of doing that over and again about 60X.

     

    It is, of course tedious, but satisfying to achieve the result I am after.

     

    More to follow!

     

    Best,

     

    Marc

  3. On 3/7/2024 at 8:15 AM, Bill97 said:

    Marc you commented that a 3 or 4 butt shift would look better for deck boards, and I agree. From your study what are your thoughts about board lengths?  Anatomy of the Ship indicates boards were in the 29-30 ft length. Other references I have read suggest board lengths that long would have been difficult to sustain for ship carpenters. Tall straight trees not always available. Longer boards also cumbersome to maneuver and store in hold. Basically suggesting board lengths would vary throughout the deck as repairs and replacements were carried out over the years. 

    Well, when simulating a deck with underlying framing, you have to first determine the likely spacing of the beams.  The hatchways are always a useful starting point for figuring this out.  Once you have a reasonable layout - and I don’t think this necessarily has to exactly match that of the Endeavor replica, it just has to be plausible and regular - you can then figure out, at scale, where planks land on beams within the 25-30’ range.

     

    This is one of those things where, since you’re not making a rigorous, fully framed and exact copy of the original ship, there is some latitude, IMO, in executing the details.  The goal is an improvement over stock, and that the execution not be jarringly wrong.

     

    Of course, the Endeavor is an example of a type of ship called a “Whitby Cat.”  If you did want to produce a fully authentic deck layout, I don’t imagine you would have too much difficulty finding original construction drafts that would show the deck framing.

     

    It’s really up to you, as to how far you want to take it.

  4. This remains one of my favorite models, Siggi.  The paint work is beautiful, but aged to perfection so that it is not perfectly pristine.  The woodwork is beautifully executed and always in-scale, and the symmetry from port to starboard is beyond reproach.  I also like that this tine period for English warships is the beginning of the end for elegantly rising sheer-lines; in the following decades everything becomes significantly flatter.

×
×
  • Create New...