Jump to content

Keith Black

NRG Member
  • Posts

    5,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Keith Black

  1. Pat, Goober gets it. Victoria's sailing characteristics were set at the dockyard when she was built. The bottle screws were intended to keep the wire rope taunt only but never for rake adjustment. Ships with deadeyes could change mast rake if a captain felt the sailing characteristics of his vessel needed adjustment. Your post #612 in Victoria's build log adds enlightenment to the discussion here.
  2. I only had one order with Model Dockyard, Nick was an easy bloke to work with. Yeah, I thought the wood effect was spot on.
  3. Os, welcome to MSW. Your Grand Banks Dory turned out beautifully done, nice clean tidy work. Glad to have you aboard.
  4. We all look forward to your updates Keith, the length of time between is immaterial.
  5. Keith, that looks fantastic! That resin ship's boat looks great, Cornwall is such a nice supplier.
  6. Pat, I keep coming back to this point and no one is providing me a satisfactory answer. I asked the following question in post #15....."Johny, the Wasa is a perfect example of the issue I'm having trouble with. It appears the rake on the main and mizzen are set at approximately 15 degrees while the fore is set at zero or close to. For the main and mizzen tops and caps to be parallel with the waterline the bow needs to pitch down 15 degrees and that puts the foremast top and cap 15 degrees out from being parallel with the waterline." Plus the rake for each mast could be changed at any time at the captain's discretion regardless of the time period. How were mast constructed so they'd be parallel with the waterline when the set of the rake would possible change at any given time. The photos I have of the Tennessee seem to indicate the mast were raked and the tops are not parallel to the waterline indicating the tops and caps were constructed parallel to one another and 90 degrees to the mast. I'm sorry if this is a case of me being a thick goober.
  7. Well, if you weren't having Kraken morning tea ya wouldn't be stumbling about.
  8. Johny, the Wasa is a perfect example of the issue I'm having trouble with. It appears the rake on the main and mizzen are set at approximately 15 degrees while the fore is set at zero or close to. For the main and mizzen tops and caps to be parallel with the waterline the bow needs to pitch down 15 degrees and that puts the foremast top and cap 15 degrees out from being parallel with the waterline. i can't imagine that sailors aloft would have found or been exposed to any more danger working on a top x number of degrees from being parallel with the waterline any more so than working on a pitching top in heavy weather in daylight let alone at night. The guts those men had is beyond my comprehension. I say men, the apprentices were mere lads of 13 to 15 years old.
  9. Pat, thank you but this has left me confused to say the least. How do you build a ship with the tops and caps parallel to the waterline regardless of the rake? This makes no sense to me. A small degree of rake in the fore and main ( I set the rake on all my mast for the Tennessee at three degrees) wouldn't be noticeable but a heavy rake on the mizzen of seven degrees or more would be noticeable. Setting different rakes for different mast (from what I've read this was a common practice) means not all the mast tops and caps are going to be parallel to the waterline. This makes my ole head wanna explode like a Gallagher watermelon.
  10. Glen, from what we can see in the photo the hull looks very convincing.
  11. Gary, I thought it was you that told a story in your Last Dollar build about building a railcar and weathering it? You took it to a show and an old guy dressed you down about the weathering and told you maybe some someday you'd learn how to properly build a model. Something like that or close to it. From the story I thought you built railroad stuff. If this wasn't/isn't your story I deem myself ready for professional help and five o'clock med cups with tiny umbrellas.
  12. Tom, how very kind of you. Now I know why mom liked you best.
  13. I looked for kits and couldn't find one. Maybe Mr Google was just being contrary?
  14. Sorry, Gary. As much of a train guy as you are I thought you'd be familiar with the term "tag". Tag = graffiti. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(graffiti)
  15. Great look, Gary. Question, do you ever tag any of your walls or rolling stock?
  16. Keith, sorry to be late to the party. On the box artwork the channels look ridiculously low, almost at the waterline, I hope that's not the case. You must have a airbrush, the paint looks great.
  17. Siggi, glad to hear all is well. I look forward to watching the Tiger progress.
  18. Oh no, can't make a stinkin' penguin but we bloody well can make a frigging bottle guzzling, viking chewing, scare the knickers off ya Kraken! This is gonna be good. Wait a minute, I thought your son lost his input privileges?
  19. The compass was illuminated, if what the arrow is pointing to is not a lamp, then where is the lamp?
×
×
  • Create New...