Jump to content

Gregory

Members
  • Posts

    3,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gregory

  1. What Mamoli is looking for you to do is trace out a pattern like I have made in red, then use strip wood pieced together like I have indicated in blue, where you would then trace the pattern to give you a shape to fit over the bow and stern without any gaps. You may want to use more pieces than they have shown in the instructions in order to easier make a curve. If this is still a problem for you and I may be able to put together a little demo with some wood.
  2. Here are the drawings at WIKI Commons Centurion 1732 There are 2, so click through to see the next one.
  3. I need to get to my drawing tools later, and I can show you what I think you need to do..
  4. I’m guessing Mamoli is showing a simplified way to put strip wood together, expecting you to match the curved shape of the stern? Do you have a picture of the profile of the boat?
  5. There are a couple of drawings in the WIKI Commons.. I can get you a link later.
  6. You should put together a book with your rigging technique. I would buy it in a heartbeat. Meanwhile, your log is a frequent visit for me. While I would be hard pressed to duplicate your work, a goal would be to get a similar look..
  7. Check out HisModel and Amazon. I see they have wooden decks for Cutty Sark.
  8. I have bought their cherry and walnut sheets, which were of reasonable quality. I think you are better off going with Modelers Sawmill or Ocooch Hardwoods.
  9. If the 2D drawings do not render well, then they are not accurate. CAD can certainly help to resolve these inaccuracies, but not having the skills to use CAD, should not keep you from producing accurate drawings for use with a laser.
  10. While I agree CAD is great for visualizing the entire ship, in the end, the laser is a 2D tool. Accurately produced 2D drawings are ultimately what you need to drive a laser, and they can be produced as accurately in a 2D environment as in a 3D one.
  11. I like the version from a Bob Seeger song: " I wish I didn't know now, what I didn't know then. " 😁
  12. Another consideration will be the software driving the laser. If the laser controller will support it, see if you can get the community to use LightBurn. It is relatively inexpensive and is very powerful. It supports 2D images that it will trace for cutting, giving you the option of skipping the CAD work if you have a good 2D drawing of your frames or other parts.
  13. Not necessarily nicer, but plywood will give you more strength for your framing. Very little, if any will be visible in the end.
  14. Just wait a couple of hundred years and all your boxwood will look that good…😁
  15. I have been meaning to give Thick and Quick a try just to see how it does. CA Does take a little extra care, but a few seconds versus several minutes clamp time means a lot to me.
  16. If it crystallizes, then there is something wrong with the formula, or the way it was used. Properly cured CA is just plastic, with fibers penetrating the wood, creating a mesh that is stronger than wood in some regards. The bond can break under shear stress, but this is unlikely to happen with planking, and not any more so than PVA. The times I have seen a CA joint come apart there was always shared wood on the two pieces, which means the wood broke before the glue did.
  17. With checkers up forward, surely you must have chess in the Captains cabin. 😁
  18. I can't say that I used any verifiable reference.. I'm sort of a " if it looks good ( to me ) it is good " modeler. I think I more or less settled on the length shown in the kit plans. The kit shows a jib boom as well as a bowsprit and I feel it has a balanced look, that I decided to go with.
  19. I think we need a picture and some context. Aren't knightheads two timberheads adjacent the stem? I am not aware of any specific rigging per se.. From Mondfeld.
  20. Take a match to it ( not too close ). If it's poly it will melt, if it's natural fiber it will burn.
  21. If you look at my Resolution build you will see that the Corel kit is based on the lines of Ferret. Corel forgoes the gammoning and rigs the bowsprit much like what is found on the later cutters. I have yet to see any ship similar to this. The Corel kit has many features that deviate from actual practice, so there is no good reason to assume their treatment of the bowsprit is based on good evidence. While the contemporary lines of Ferret says the ship is a cutter rigged sloop, I believe this relates more to the mast placement and sail arrangement and doesn’t account for a moveable bowsprit like found on cutters. PS FWIW The gammoning you see in the Chapelle drawing is based on educated conjecture and not the drawings he references.
  22. As I said above, just the process of making a cable out of several ropes would have resulted in the opposite twist. I answered my own question in that regard. I suppose the choice of one over the other, would be size..
  23. With some thought, because a cable would have been laid up from ropes, it would have had the opposite twist of the ropes.
  24. Any idea how the lay of the rope affects the use/handling of the rope?
×
×
  • Create New...