Jump to content

shipman

Members
  • Posts

    1,223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    UK
  • Interests
    Collecting books. Bonsai. Classic Bikes. Ships and Ship Models.

Recent Profile Visitors

3,756 profile views
  1. No; the Airfix Kit is unique to them.
  2. James, thank you for accepting my apology. Out of interest there are Plenty of DIY projects to be found online; people making their own simple, working turbofan/turbojet engines. Often these are made from the simplest materials, with varying results, but usually succeed by producing something which demonstrates the basics of this type of engine. The simplest and most remarkable are the pulse jet types which have no moving parts at all! I should point out that taking that rout can be fraught with danger, but a big dose of common sense and a modicum of research would be wise. Looking at your model I can see it could be modified to work as a real engine, but for how long? Again, thank you for sharing your project, I'm sure you'll have years of reliable service.
  3. So glad you found this kit so rewarding. Sad my earlier wry comments weren't appreciated and subsequently deleted. My expectations were this would be a functioning gas turbine engine. The disappointment was totally mine; that shouldn't detract from the pleasure you sincerely derived building this kit. Thank you for sharing.
  4. Isn't that why he says.... ''PM me if you are interested or want further information''.
  5. Once again, thank you Eberhard. I know you are fond of using shellac; so do you dissolve flakes of the stuff in alcohol (IPA?) And by what proportions? Once prepared, how long will it keep in a sealed screw-top mini jar? Using the same ingredients in the same proportions, will that result in the same colour? Thanks for the tips......I've never used shellac.
  6. Another thought.... why not use slightly thinned PVA as a wood sealer?
  7. Thank you, Eberhard, I'll take your advice on board. I understand 'Blue Ensign' has had success on his Longboat models using acrylics for colour in combination with 'wipe on polly' (W O P). What is this 'W O P'?
  8. Thanks for your advice, Graham and Davec. I feel you are both correct; experimental testing is the sensible approach here. Will be happy to share results, along with a build log. Itching to get started, yet waiting for the kits to arrive from 'Falconet'.
  9. Here's a question:- I intend building a series of miniature oared boats. The wood will be Pear, assembled with PVA. The simplest approach would be to complete them and finish them with Tung oil. But I'd like to introduce a little colour to several strakes and fittings, probably using washes of thinned Tamiya acrylics, with the remainder wiped with Tung oil. What would be the best sequence; to paint and complete the model, then ad the oil? My intention is to use the colour sparingly, attempting to get a used appearance. Any thoughts would be welcome.
  10. A splendid model, a true miniature of the real 'plane. Well done! Such a shame the 'Sabre' engine was put behind the prioritised 'Merlin' by the procurement ministry. Both engines were being developed pre-war. RR won the lobbying war and did a fine job with their contribution to the British war effort. It was a simple matter of marshalling limited resources. The hard to build Spitfire also got the nod over 'Tiffy' development at the same period, though you can't argue with how Supermarine continuously refined their product. The only 'Tiffy' remotely capable being put back in the sky belongs to Kirmit Weeks.... time will tell.
  11. GADZOOKS! What's happening? I broached the subject of JPEG/PNG images on the 18th October, at which time I found your 'WESPE' build log images were JPEG files. Today, 26th October, I decided to list the original page numbers where these small boats could be found for my and others convenience. NOW the 'WESPE' build log HAS CHANGED TO PNG FILES!!!!! I understand PNG files take less server space and it is becoming common practice to convert to this format. This has nothing to do with Eberhard's intentions.....it's an administrators prerogative/choice. I for one, don't like the change. There are other sites of interest, where one finds all the images are only visibly clear subject to the viewer subscribing to an outside picture host. Which means I have no interest in visiting those sites, no matter their content. My point of view is why change something that has worked for years? A logical progression could be access to the forum would require members to subscribe to an operating system which for many reasons I would not wish to do. Sorry, Eberhard, for this issue to raise its ugly head within your post. Perhaps the subject is worth opening it's own thread?
  12. My system is TOFFEE APPLE', held together with BUTTERSCOTCH.....can't be doing with all this virtual voodoo at my age. Like if my dinner is on the plate, I'll eat it. If not, then I'll starve. Now if you don't mind, I have my IRONY BOARD to put away. But I do appreciate your concerne and advice.
  13. Perhaps the moderators would care to comment, even re-convert the PNG images to JPEG?
  14. That was a wonderful tutorial, Eberhard. Thank you. Reffering to your response in your post #4..... ''My original pictures are JPGs and uploaded as such. However, it seems that the MSW forum software converts these into PNGs so that their size can be automatically adjusted to the width of the screen. I have no control over that''. Your entire, marvelous 'WESPE' build images are ALL JPEG files. Were these not also uploaded to the MSW as JPEG's, yet escaped the mysterious conversion to PNG?
  15. Seems a lot of bother, when a few dabs of paint would be sufficient and permanent.
×
×
  • Create New...