Jump to content

allanyed

NRG Member
  • Posts

    8,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by allanyed

  1. Gary, Your shop is larger than our first apartment!!! Good for you on your retirement, super congratulations. Allan
  2. If you can live with what appears to be a close substitute, you may want to consider Buxus macowanii, aka Cape Box, from Rare Woods USA. Allan
  3. Kapas The dimensions appear to match closely to Sutherland's Shipbuilding Unveiled for a 225 Ton vessel. I saved the image from Gregory above, inserted into a cad drawing, scaled it to the scale laid on the drawing that Gregory posted, then saved as a PDF and printed. Came out dead on and is 76.2 mm (3 inches). If you still need a drawing, please feel free to PM me your email address and I can email you the PDF which you can use to print the sheet on your home printer. Allan
  4. Castos, With the equipment you show, you hit home for me. I have similar a situation and have not had a proper work area since we moved south several years ago. We have gone to one car so there is now room in the garage and your layout looks similar to what I have in mind. My only problem is that the summers in SW Florida can be stifling, so at least a ceiling fan and/or a portable AC unit or some such will be part of the set up. Any suggestions here would be more than welcome. I am seriously considering setting up a bit of duct work and large vacuum system or adding a semi permanent shop vac as it only needs to be used when making sawdust anyhow. Would be nice though to enclose it to cut down the noise. Any suggestions on this would be welcome as well. Allan
  5. The following is a higher resolution IB Profile of Vanguard 1748 that shows the floor and futtock riders more clearly. You can save it and enlarge quite a bit. This is from the earlier post on NMM hi res drawings on Wiki. Hope it helps. Allan
  6. Jim The Shipbuilder's Repository (1788) does not give the number of riders for a 50, but does give three for a 64. The 1770 inboard profile drawing of the Portland class 50s, which includes Portland, Leopard, Jupiter, Adamant, Leander and Europa shows three and their locations. https://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/81511.html Allan
  7. Thanks for posting Druxey, I hope there will be more information coming from them even if they have no plans to recover the remaining 75%
  8. Hi Colin, As Peter said above 30,000 heads are better than one. You may actually wind up with too much information on occasion when asking questions here but that is a good thing. I have learned more from questions asked by others at MSW than those I have asked on my own. It is win-win for all 30K of us when you or any of us run into a roadblock and need a bit of help. Welcome!!!
  9. I think we have a consensus! Thanks Druxey. I don't know that I look forward to actually making these, but it will be an interesting mini project to be sure. Allan
  10. Hi Mike, You will get all the encouragement in the world here and great advice as well. Welcome to the team, you just picked up thousands of new friends, and advisors!! Allan
  11. I am not sure what you mean by skyward. Decks generally had deck beams with rounding of various amounts although the Orlop often did not. The below is from a fourth rate of the late 17th century. When you describe skyward I was thinking it to be concave, not convex which I don't think would be correct on any ship of any era. Allan
  12. Sergeant Tom ( I assume this is the source of your screen name as you served as a marine) There is a mention of nails to hold wet planks in place above. Planks will swell when wet so do not try to glue wet planks in place as they will shrink when drying and leave a slight gap between strakes. You can pin the wet planks in place without glue then remove them when dry and then glue the dry formed pieces in place. I will not go into spiling as I understand most if not all the kits only include strips for the planking and you will be relegated to using these and the included issues with bending in two axes. If you do use pins there are going to be holes that can be seen so consider using the pins in the spots where you would use treenails after the planks are glued in place. As also mentioned above, there are a variety of planking clamp ideas here that you may wish to try. Just be attentive to clamping wet wood as you could leave dents in the planks made by the clamps. Regarding CA glue, based on having used it in the past, my personal opinion is there is no need for it in ship modeling. PVA for wood, silver solder for metal work, epoxy when needed, and diluted white glue in rigging when called for. Please do consider posting a build log as you will get a lot of great advice as you progress. Allan
  13. After further discussions directly with another astute member here, another possible solution has been raised. The verbiage in the contract describes the clamps and spirketting of two strakes to be "Tabled in the meeting edges AND scarphed hook and butt" Taken literally this could be that there are two parts of the construction in play. The following sketch is what was proposed as a possible design based on the worded description. Allan
  14. Bob and Alex, I have gone to Batchvarov's thesis a number of times over the past few years and I thank you for bringing it up as it is a great source. He describes the use of chocks that cross the keel as well as chocks where the futtocks join in Chapter 3 of his thesis, Framing of Ships in the Second half of the 17th Century including a sketch showing shouldered chocks on page 51. He has several charts showing a number of vessels with information from contemporary sources, including contracts, that indicate the use of scarphs on some and chocks on others. I have just recently emailed Karoum to discuss this very topic but no luck so far in getting a response. Jaager, I appreciate your response and sentiment. I have not really researched ships of other nations on this project but in sketch C in my earlier post it shows a chocked joint found on a Swedish ship wreck frame. I have no idea on their use in other nations. Whether they show on the model or not, they do add strength to the framing and for me, these details are part of the fun in construction. I would not encourage nor discourage the use of such details to others, it's just my own personal preference to include many details even knowing no one will ever see them or that they would even care if they did 😆 Allan
  15. Thanks!! I do hope there are some photos or drawings to be found from wrecks of the late 17th century. And the search goes on...… and on...… and on....😁 Allan
  16. As Henry said, you need something to allow the yards to be moved, be it a parrel with trucks and ribs or a truss parrel, which was made of rope with no ribs or trucks (beads) The following pictures are from Lees' Masting and Rigging page 84. Allan
  17. Bob, I am curious to the source on the rolling ball idea. To lubricate with olive oil, the barrels could be swabbed then tampioned. The olive oil will last a long time without having to have a ball rolling back and forth which carries it own problems such as knocking out the tampion as stated above and an extra step having to extract it before loading powder when going into action. May very well be what was done, but definitely a new one for me. Allan
  18. The contracts for five of the 130 foot group 50 gun British ships in the mid 1690s describe GD and UD clamps and GD spirketting as having Flemish hook and butt scarphs and tabled together. The exact wording for the gun deck spirketting is To be of Oake Four Inches Thick and Fourteen Inches Broad and Tabled in the Meeting Edges Two Inches one into ye Other and Scarphed Hooke and Butt Flemmish Fashion at least Four Foot Long. I understand coaking in the scarphs and rabbeting the two strakes together if it were called for, but I cannot find a definition or description of what is meant by tabling. To me it sounds like the edges are rabbeted together for the run of the strakes, but I do not recall ever seeing this term in the past so not sure what this would look like. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Allan
  19. For a British ship circa 1690s I believe there were likely chocks at the joints of the futtocks. Drawings in The Restoration Warship by Richard Endsor, which is a thorough study of Lenox 1678, shows chocks that are triangular in shape and rather small. As I have learned, sharp corners were avoided as much as possible in ship building, thus it is possible that the chocks may have had shoulders. I have been unable to find contemporary information or close to contemporary for the late 17th century that describes the shape of the chocks, be they triangular or with shoulders. I would appreciate it if anyone can steer me to contemporary sources with details on these chocks. A sketch below is what I am puzzling over. In contrast to the use of chocks, Goodwin is clear by sketch and words that from 1650 to 1710, hook scarphs were used, not chocks. His sketches of chocks beginning in 1710 do have shoulders. Regardless of choice of chocks or scarphs, both can be argued to be correct based on these two sources, but I would love to find or hear about contemporary information as that would be the best way to make a decision. Just to throw another wrench into the mix, sketch C is of an actual joint on the Swedish ship Carolus XI 1678. This is probably not applicable, but I thought it was interesting. Allan
  20. Ferit Are you referring to the Frigate Berlin 1674? Ships in the British Navy in the late 17th century had parrels with ribs and trucks on the foreyard, main yard, fore and main topsail yards, and on the starboard side of the mizen mast for the mizen yard for a lateen sail as the yard lay on the port side of the mast. A truss parrel superseded the parrel of the ribs and trucks on the mizen yard in abut 1773 (Lees Masting and Rigging, page 105). The topgallant yards were fitted the same way as the topsail yards until about 1805 then went to truss parrels. The cross jack had no parrels, but rather slings until 1773 at which time a truss was used. Allan
  21. Doug, And sometimes they set a grating upright and tied a sailor to it for strokes from the cat as below. That would be an interesting scene to model. Allan
  22. Duane, I did some checking and looking at the QD on Euryalus which carried 32 pounder carronades on her QD an FC, not all the top timbers carried to the top rail so there were indeed larger spaces similar to what you show. The inboard side did carry 2" planking. Allan
  23. Your workmanship is extremely clean, cudos!! Rather than paint the inboard side of the outer planking red, maybe install the inboard planking and leave it natural or paint it red. There also seems to be a lot of missing frames. Looks like there should be at least 3 or 4 additional frames between each of those that are in place. If you do add the inboard planking and add a cap rail, no need to add more frames as they will be hidden. Thanks for sharing your build. Allan
  24. Andy, Is this a keel or is it the slotted backbone usually used in kits to hold the bulkheads? Tapering a keel can be done by drawing a fine pencil line long the centerline of the top or bottom of the keel then marking the 3mm (1.5mm from the center line), drawing a line to the 5mm wide point then tapering with plane, chisels, file, or sanding. The tapering should be done before the rabbet is made. I prefer planes and/or sanding but that is just my own personal choice. If it is the slotted centerboard that you are referring to, I am sorry I have no idea on tapering this other than sanding as I assume it is plywood. Allan
×
×
  • Create New...