Jump to content

allanyed

NRG Member
  • Posts

    8,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by allanyed

  1. Hi Herman, I think there MAY be some question regarding the description that BNII was a fishing vessel. Bluenose II is a replica of the fishing and racing schooner Bluenose, commissioned by Sidney Oland and built in 1963 as a promotional yacht. He donated the schooner to Nova Scotia in 1971 and it then operated as a sailing ambassador and promotional device. It was never used as a fishing schooner. The drawing brings up a question though. It states that the anchor cable was sometimes bent to the jumbo halyard. Is this true and if it is, why?? Hopefully one of sailing members can explain. Allan
  2. Hi Toni, Have you contacted the Maine Maritime Museum? They have various plans that MAYBE will be of some help. This looks like a very interesting build and I for one look forward to seeing your progress!! Allan
  3. If you are happy that is all that matters. To each his own when it comes to whatever it is we want to do for any endeavor (except maybe for brain surgeons) Cheers Allan
  4. Thenk yu everryone I wonder why all three words are underlined in red on my screen😀
  5. Hi John, Bluenose II carried two Caterpillar 250HP Diesels and props for propulsion. (See BNII photo below) Interestingly these gave her a top speed of 8 knots under this auxiliary power, half of what she could achieve in a strong wind with only sails. I am not sure what engines and prop sizes are on Bluenose IV. If your model has no props, it would make sense that she is the Bluenose I so the only chain would be the rode shackled to the hemp line. These would probably be no more than about 10 to 15 feet. As an aside, the following article on the transition from hemp to iron is very detailed and interesting. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00253359.2013.767000 Allan
  6. Arnold, Is your model the Bluenose 1921, Bluenose II 1963 or Bluenose IV 2007? There are many differences between them including twin 250 HP Diesel engines on the Bluenose 2 that were not found on the Bluenose. Other differences such as anchor lines, fittings, electrical apparatus and more might be considerations for your model depending on which version you are building. Allan
  7. Hi Chapel, What size launch is this? I notice you have the tholes set up with two for each of three thwarts, but no tholes for two of the thwarts so no possibility of rowers to use these thwarts which would likely never be the case. Is this a kit instruction? If it is single banked they would be alternating and more likely having six thwarts, but if double banked every thwart would have a pair, not just some of them. Maybe consider scratch building a launch or other types of boats on your next adventure, it is not a difficult project. There are several current launch builds in the scratch build forum (1751-1800) as well as a dozens of contemporary drawings on the RMG Collections site and the Wiki Commons site that should help. There are scantlings available for everything from frames to risings as well, in a number of publications. I realize this is only your second build, so baby steps. 😀 It is never easy but should always be fun! Thank you for sharing your build with us! Allan
  8. Arnold Welcome to MSW!!!! According to Howard Chappelle, Banks Schooners used hemp cable, not chain. Chain cable was used for harbor service. When chain was carried for harbor service it was stud link chain with 5 inch X 3inch links on boats more than 75 feet long so would be appropriate for Bluenose. He does not mention how long the rode is nor if it was hemp or chain. If you need to make a rode of chain, at your scale, links would be 12 links per inch. Keep in mind the links are stud links, not open links but at your scale may not be noticeable to most folks. Allan
  9. My spell check is no longer working on MSW and I cannot figure how to turn it back on. My spelling leaves something to be desired so I appreciate all the help I can get with Spell Check. If someone can tell me how to get it to work I would be grateful Allan
  10. If you want chrome rather than paint you can chrome plate parts yourself. Might not be worth the effort compared to painting but it is an alternative. https://caswellplating.com/electroplating-anodizing/chrome-plating-kits.html Allan
  11. https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-136130 for a VDV portrait. Don't know that the following will help but if her keel length was 123' 6": For the R&S, one could use the information in Goodwin's The Construction and Fitting of the English Man of War for a second rate ship. Per Deane, the moulded beam is the length of keel X 3/10 123'6" X 0.3 = 37.05 feet Depth of keel = 1/2" for each foot of moulded beam X 37.05 = 18.5" Siding of frame = 5/7 X depth of keel = 12.86" Assumimg an average space between frames of about 2" the R&S is 12.86+2+12.86+2 = 29 3/4" Someone might want to check my math just in case🤔 Allan
  12. Yes, making the framing for the lights is a challenge at any scale from about 1:48 and smaller. I have even used wire for an experiment at 1:196. At 1:98 the frame parts would be something like 0.01X0.015 so can be done with a good hard wood like box or someother tight grained hard wood. For the future, maybe consider plastic frames. There are styrene strips available at 0.010" X 0.02" that might work for you. It can be mortised with out breaking for a good fit of the parts. I like to make a template for each light then make and assemble the muntons and stiles on the template. Once the framework is complete you can glue a clear plastic piece to the inboard side of the finished unit then glue the entire assembly in place. Just be sure to have a ledge of some sort in the light opening to support the assembly when it is placed and glued in place. It is a challenge to be sure, but they are a very visible and noticeable part of any model so worth the time and effort to make them as neatly as possible for many folks. Allan
  13. Hi Kostas Thank you for sharing your build, it is a pleasure to follow your nice work. Are the stern and gallery lights (windows) from the kit? The reason I ask is that the stern lights have nine panes in each light rather than the six shown in post #17 and I believe the gallery lights have two rows with six panes and the lower row with nine panes. I realize this may be a kit design error. Allan
  14. Hi Rob Just tuned in and congratulate you on your points in post #2. You have spotted a lot of things that could use some improvements. There are a couple build logs on building ships' boats in the scratch build forum that you may find helpful. These center around a 23 foot launch but the methods can be applied to any type and size boat and as you have a thicknesser set up you will have an easy time of it. Treenails at your scale may be a challenge for the deck planking. They would be about 0.015" or less in diameter. For the hull they would be closer to 0.03" so doable but as this is POF, you will need to account for the 70 or so missing frames. For trennals, when in doubt, leave them out. Looking forward to your progress!! Allan
  15. A warm welcome to you. Our youngest son and daughter-in-law ran a 200+ mile foot race in Wales last September and raved about the beauty of Wales. Hope the admiral and I get to visit there one day. Allan
  16. Your photo appears to be a replica ship or modern rebuild and may not be representative of a ship that is a contemporary of the Bellona,1760. The decks were trennaled at that point in time and often sunk sufficiently to be able to be covered with a wooden piece so the trennals would not be very noticeable at full size and all but invisible at 1:48 and smaller. The trennals on the deck were typically 3/4" to 1" diameter, so at 1:48 a diameter of about 0.015. Making trennals at this diameter is a daunting task even with bamboo. I like to use trennals on the hull planking at 1:48 or larger (1.5" to 2" diameter) but very careful about what wood to use, so as to yield a subtle appearance. Too many models have trennals that are out of scale and/or have a stark contrast with the planking like in your photo so it looks like a very bad case of the measles on a model. I agree with the idea of not showing the trennals, but your not knowing where the deck frames are and with the extremely high quality of your work that would really surprise me ...... 😀 . https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-81150 Oh, and lazy??? NO way a lazy builder will achieve the quality you have reached. Love your log Yves, it is fun to follow! Allan
  17. I found there was an error in W. E. May's The Boats of Men if War for the dimensions of the ears for a 24 foot launch. Thanks to member AON, I have made a notation in my May book after looking at May's source, the scantlings given by David Steel in folio LVII. The ears in May's book for this size launch show them to be sided 1' 3" with a length of 6" Per Steel they should be sided 3" and 1' 6" in length. Looks like transposed numbers in the May book. Allan
  18. Absolutely beautiful work on both the stove AND the brick work. Allan
  19. It is great to see you researching then carrying out and putting into effect the methods you are studying. In this case it works for ships and boats both, and yields planking that looks like a real vessel. Allan
  20. Everything takes time in this hobby of ours, and I am talking years, but as you try new methods that have worked for hundreds of years, it does get easier. Not easy, but easier. Allan
  21. I understand that with the kits they provide pre-made strips of wood so spiling is not possible. A great alternative is to use the method in the videos by Chuck Passaro. You can use the strips they provide in the kit and still taper them as would be normal on a ship and preshape the edge bend with heat or water and heat. The method works beautifully for most species of wood. Look at the below and you will see what a properly planked hull looks like with the tapering as well a drop strake at the bow and a stealer at the stern. Also, note that the garboard strake next to the keel does not ride up the stem, but rather, it ends at the boxing joint. It may seem like a lot to digest, but one step at a time will work for you. Once you have done this it will make a lot of sense and it will be easier on following projects. Allan
×
×
  • Create New...