Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (Only 20 donations so far - C'mon guys!) ×

Jim Lad

Moderators
  • Posts

    9,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Lad

  1. That frame is coming together beautifully, Greg. John
  2. Just catching up, Keith. Your work continues to impress - just beautiful! John
  3. Hello Jason, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  4. You've made a good start to what will be a very interesting model. John
  5. Hello John, and a warm welcome to the forum from over on the east coast. John
  6. Excellent! That's worked really well. John
  7. Hello Kale, and a warm welcome to MSW from down in Oz. John
  8. Hello John, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. my dear lady wife is a native of Heywood - not too far from you. John
  9. Looking good, Dan. I think your containers are a very acceptable compromise. John
  10. Yes, of course, Keith. In port the boom would be swung out into its rigged position to become the boat boom, but that still leaves the problem of the crane sitting right under the boat, plus the problem of dealing with the boom in an emergency at sea.! John
  11. Never mind the gravestones and artefacts; show us the hull!!! John
  12. Patrick, I had a bit of a fiddle with your photo in Topaz Denoise, but could only get a marginal improvement. I agree with you that the photo shows some sort of bracket abaft the davit and also clearly shows another problem - the boom topping lift (or whatever you would call it in the Grey Funnel Line) clearly leads from the after end of the boom and up to the mast. While this could easily be unshackled and stowed prior to sailing, it's yet another impediment to working that boat. If it were my ship, I'd have some sort of quick release pin fitted inboard to ditch the crane in an emergency, but that still wouldn't explain how the boat was launched in port! As has been said in Hollywood, "It is indeed a puzzlement". John
  13. That's certainly a possibility, Druxey, but seems a very clumsy way of handling a boat. Why build in such a way as to make operating the ship and her equipment difficult? I feel there must be a solution that resolves the normal use of both boom and boat. John
  14. hello Mike, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  15. G'day mate, and a warm welcome to the forum from Sydney. There shouldn't be any problem in getting a wooden kit through the bio checks at the border, as it's not fresh wood, but processed. John
  16. A tricky problem, Patrick. To my eye, that boom crane looks far too long, but if you've made it according to the plans, then it must be correct. Even is the boom was stowed inboard, that crane would certainly still interfere with the operation of the boat. I can't imagine the crane being unbolted and removed in order to lower the boat, so I think there must be an error f some sort in the specifications or the available images. I'm just looking at it from the point of view of the practical operation of the ship. The two seem incompatible to me. John
  17. Coming along nicely, Dan. An interesting commentary on the work involved in teasing out the details of fixtures and fitting from those photographs. I trust the cataract surgery went to plan and hope you get through the long covid OK. John
  18. Hello Bowline, and a warm welcome to MSW from 'Down Under'. Looks like you've made a very good start to your model. John
  19. Coming along very nicely, mate. You've got just a little bit of glazing to do there! John
  20. Hello Frank, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  21. A nice start, mate. I agree the mast looks just a tad heavy - especially given that when finished with all its bits and pieces it will look even thicker. John
×
×
  • Create New...