Jump to content
New Publication - Ship Modeler's Handbook - They're back in stock! Thank you for your patience. ×

Stuntflyer

NRG Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,196

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Stuntflyer

  1. Stuntflyer
    Well, Steve, I certainly wouldn't discourage anyone from using Cherry. Of course, one would get all those great mini-kits from Chuck too. Mike
  2. Stuntflyer
    Neatly done, Steve! Mike
  3. Stuntflyer
    Hello everyone! Since my last post I have been contemplating whether or not my using Cherry as the primary wood was the right choice for me. No doubt some beautiful ships have been built from Cherry, but I really prefer the look of boxwood. I thought about removing just the knee and keel assembly, but quickly ruled that out. The problem being that it would be difficult aligning those new parts to the already assembled bulkhead former/bulkhead assembly. This meant that I would have to start over from the beginning. So, over the last few weeks I have managed to re-build her with boxwood. Right now, 3/16" laser cut boxwood kits are not being offered for the Winnie. The nine pieces making up the knee parts were scratched from 3/16" boxwood sheet. The mill came in handy for making the bobstay holes and gammon slot. I'm going with copper bolts this time. Blackening will be done later. Large blocks were used to handle any slight twists in the bulkheads while at the same time keeping the structure straight. The two lower platforms were added as well. Mike
  4. Stuntflyer
    Made a bit more progress today by simulating the lower stem and keel bolts. Holes were drilled with a #76 bit and filled with .017 black monofilament and PVA glue. I'm not a big fan of CA as it has a tendency to discolor the wood. I anxious to see what the Cherry will look like after a coat of W-O-P. I should know soon enough. Mike
  5. Stuntflyer
    In preparation for making the false keel, the keel bottom was sanded 90° to its adjacent edge and smooth across its bottom face. To do this, I first raised the bulkhead former/keel assembly off the flat surface with 1/4" flat sheet. I used a square sanding block, gliding along the flat surface of the board to sand the edge. The false keel was ripped on the table saw from some scrap Cheery that I had lying around. It's made in three sections joined with what I think is called a "Harris joint". As you can see, I located the joint far enough away from the keel joint. In preparation for adding the bulkheads I made the build board that will hold everything upright and straight. Mike
  6. Stuntflyer
    I Added knee assembly to the bulkhead former. Some shaping was necessary in order to get a nice fit around the rabbet. Next I added the four section keel. You should be able to see where I removed a short section of the rabbet to accommodate the aft most keel section. Mike
  7. Stuntflyer
    I managed to complete the bearding line today. The wood is easy to work with, using just a coarse file and some medium grit sandpaper. The rabbet will be shortened as Chuck described above when I attach the aft section of the four section keel. Mike
  8. Stuntflyer
    Yup! Got it. I will use the the additional length to guide me while shaping the bearding line and then remove it afterwards. Mike
  9. Stuntflyer
    Snowy nights are a perfect time to get back into the workshop. The bulkhead former is now in one piece. These laser cut parts were joined with Elmer's Carpenter glue without any prior sanding on the joints. A slab of flat marble was used to rest the parts on while the glue set. The bearding line is laser etched into one side of the former. I traced the line and transferred its shape to the other side using graphite paper. The rabbet is 1/16" x 3/32" strip which was cut from 3/32" boxwood sheet. The fore side was moistened and heat bent into shape with a blow dryer. Since the former is rather long the rabbet strip was made in two pieces joined with an angle joint for strength. This joint also makes it easy to align the next section, simply by slipping it under the first section. The completed rabbet with a small section also added to the aft area of the former. Mike
  10. Stuntflyer
    Nicely done, Bob! Looking forward to your next build, as always. Mike
  11. Stuntflyer
    Thanks guys for the kind words and for all the "Likes". Right now I'm trying to decide whether to fair the exterior hull or continue making deck clamps. Mike
  12. Stuntflyer
    With the upper deck clamps completed I was able to install the keelson. Lengths of pine were pushed down by strips that I passed athwartships through the spaces between the frames, thus holding the keelson down tight to the floor timbers while the glue sets. With the keelson in place bolts were inserted and peened down tight into the floors timbers. Mike
  13. Stuntflyer
    Beautiful work, druxey! I know how much research went into the ship's rigging and other details. Good luck with the forthcoming book. Mike
  14. Stuntflyer
    Kurt, you can find it here . . https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2057872.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.XiGaging+Digital+Electronic+Height+Gauge+with+Magnetic+Base%2C+6+Inch.TRS5&_nkw=iGaging+Digital+Electronic+Height+Gauge+with+Magnetic+Base%2C+6+Inch&_sacat=0
  15. Stuntflyer
    The keelson has all three sections joined and sanded to shape, though not glued to the frames yet. I will need to drill holes for the bolts which will go through each floor timber and install the two upper deck clamps first. The upper deck clamp is 4" thick (.083 actual). It is made in three sections joined by two scarph joints. The fore section had to be steam bent into shape. The other two sections were shaped with dry heat. The height of the clamp was carefully measured at several stations (frame locations) on the draught. Those measurements along with adjustments necessary to account for the beam heights were then transferred to the frames with the aid of a height gauge. I attached a piece of strip wood to the gauge that was thin enough to fit between the frames. Looking at the these photos, it appears that the clamp is sloping downward as it turns inward near the transom. Before going into panic mode I decided to check this out for myself. I placed a batten along the top edge of the clamp while eyeing it from the rear of the ship. Turns out it's just an optical illusion. With the port side completed these frames are now quite strong compared to before. Mike
  16. Stuntflyer
    Hi Tom, Here is the information you were looking for. I use both the "0" and "2" cut. Mostly the "0". The tip is 8mm wide. http://www.ottofrei.com/Riffler-File-Hand-LR12711 Mike
  17. Stuntflyer
    Happy New Year Ken, I did a re-write of the post which I'm hoping will make things a bit clearer. Mike
  18. Stuntflyer
    druxey: Some of those steps in the floors are more than slight. I don't mind the extra sanding if it insures that the frames are not cut too thin to begin with. Kurt: A lot of these frames have glue squeezed out. I disc sanded one frame smooth and almost took off too much wood. So, I kinda gave up on that idea. Besides, I love sanding wood! Mike
  19. Stuntflyer
    Thank you all for your comments and "Likes" My plan for fairing the frame floors. . I started fairing the inner hull at the toptimbers which was easy enough. As I moved down toward the frame floors, I realized that I had to establish the height of each floor above the building board while getting the overall slope to match the shape of the keelson. To do this, I decided to make the three section keelson, using each section as a sanding block. Each section was left quite a bit higher so I would have something to hold onto. Sticky back sandpaper was adhered to the bottom face. So, after adding a number of frames, moving the block back and forth, in very short strokes, eventually brought the floors down to match the keelson shape. Floor heights were checked above the drawing board as sanding progressed. Aft section test fit Moving ahead, I added the middle section of the keelson. Sandpaper was added to the middle section and five layers of blue masking tape added to the aft section which matched thickness of the sandpaper. Now I could sand down those frames forward of the aft section without affecting the work already done. Sanding leaves shallow notches in the floors that are too high. Test fit with two sections completed. Mike
  20. Stuntflyer
    Happy New Year to all! I finally reach a milestone over the holidays, though I still need to do some additional fairing on the inner hull. Once that's completed, I will move onto to installing the deck clamps. They will help to stabilize the hull in preparation for the exterior hull fairing. Mike
  21. Stuntflyer
    Steve, Looking at the instruction photos, it appears that the thwarts butt against the frames. Mike
  22. Stuntflyer
    Snowy day here in NY. . Four more frames installed and the usual internal fairing resumes. More work is needed on the previously installed frames to account for the downward slope of the floor timbers and changing angles. All of the frames are cut slightly wide of the drawings, both inside and out, leaving them quite rough looking. Toptimbers are made taller as well. Being my first POF build, I'm not taking any chances in making them too small. It means extra work in the fairing process, but better safe than sorry. Removing one of these would not be a fun. 11 more to go. Rifflers are my go-to tool to start things off. Battens insure that things stay smooth. Mike
  23. Stuntflyer
    Beautifully done, Rusty! Looking forward to following your next project. Mike
  24. Stuntflyer
    Erik, you're welcome and thank you! I finally figured out what was causing the reddish/pink hue in the above photos. It was the overhead light bulbs I was using which were recently changed. I should have known that it was my doing. Mike
  25. Stuntflyer
    Thank you Steve, druxey, Thomas, Nils and for all the "Likes" too! The only thing left to do is to get her on a stand and in a case. Mike

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)

Helpful Links

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.

The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.

Our Emblem ®

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

Nautical Research Guild ® and the NRG logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,999,236 & No. 6,999,237, registered March 14, 2023)

×
×
  • Create New...