Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know it has been quite a while - much longer than expected! The 'quick diversion' of building the Santos-Dumont 14bis turned into researching and building a model of the Santos-Dumont No 18 Hydroplane. But that is done and today I got out the Swiss Pear and started to mill enough wood to finish the remaining frames.

MillingWoodAgain.jpg.56075b442571b75ef3e10841f9232ee8.jpg

Looking forward to making frames and then a keel structure to place them on!

Posted

Good deal of time at the scroll saw, followed by trimming ends on the Byrnes table saw, and milling of the slots for attaching to keel. So now I have a 'kit' for frames 2 - 8 to assemble!

TypeCFramesReadyforAssembly.jpg.a8172bcf9678873973e98b01939db39c.jpg

I think 3 or 4 frames fit between my glass sheets for drying, so 2 - 3 days of work with these. Simultaneously, I can start building a kit for Type C frames 43 - 57. After that, it looks like I better get at the keel structure and make a building board / cradle for L' Invention. I am really looking forward to seeing the frames standing up in order giving a first impression of the hull shape!

Posted

Most of the parts for frames 43- 50 are ready to cut out. Blanks for the two part floors are between glass plates drying flat. Photocopied patterns for all the parts for frames 51 - 57 are in the plastic tray ready to be rubber cemented to wood. I feel I'm getting rather proficient with the frame assembly line!

TypeCFrames43to50ReadyforCutting.jpg.ea664317b62c81692ffc222b09119dff.jpg

Looks like I also need to prepare a bit more 4mm thick material for the last 7 full frames - not going to make it with what I've already milled.

Posted

Nice work Greg !  Currently Im plowing thru my keel on La Renommee - its a challenge to get it right - lots of milling.  Its much more interesting than the monotony of building frames.  Look forward to seeing your progress

Posted
1 hour ago, ChrisLBren said:

Nice work Greg !  Currently Im plowing thru my keel on La Renommee - its a challenge to get it right - lots of milling.  Its much more interesting than the monotony of building frames.  Look forward to seeing your progress

Thanks for dropping in, the complement, and for making your very nice build known to me!

 

Greg

Posted

I just discovered your excellent build log!

 

I'm excited because you are a few weeks ahead of my build of the bomb ketch Salamandre.  This means I can see how you complete the steps I am about to start!!

 

Your frames look superb (I'm 75% through frame construction).  I wait with anticipation to watch you mill and construct the keel.

 

Thanks for posting such detailed pictures and descriptions!

 

Posted
On 6/4/2025 at 8:10 PM, BradNSW said:

I just discovered your excellent build log!

 

I'm excited because you are a few weeks ahead of my build of the bomb ketch Salamandre.  This means I can see how you complete the steps I am about to start!!

 

Your frames look superb (I'm 75% through frame construction).  I wait with anticipation to watch you mill and construct the keel.

 

Thanks for posting such detailed pictures and descriptions!

 

I'm glad you like what you are seeing here. I got a chance to see the work you have been doing as well - very impressive!

 

All the best,

 

Greg

Posted

Finally all these parts have been milled to their proper dimensions (two pieces I didn't like my first attempt and remade them) - time to start in on the scarf joints!

KeelandFalseKeel2.jpg.4328d65207b12164ec1fb941e08f023e.jpg

Hopefully milling of the the joints go well so that this step doesn't need anymore redo's. 

Posted

Before refining the joints, the accumulated error in length of the keel was nearly 2mm over the ~80mm unit. After working more on the joints, I've reduced this to less than 0.5 mm; so I'm now within 0.6% of the plans. I concerned that if I go further, I may end up being off by more in the negative side / am I already in the area of contraction / expansion of the paper plans - what to do now?

 

Here's what the 4 scarf joints that link the 5 pieces of the keel from fore to aft:

 KeelScarf1.jpg.d1d1541e4a9902f78920708b48abf9e2.jpgKeelScarf2.jpg.99684a39c6574ba41bfe8c6efa09d787.jpgKeelScarf3.jpg.5a8be0024cbc8500b45505233a756503.jpgKeelScarf4.jpg.66b7fd3b503897674f3724e116a2de11.jpg

Next up some work on the false keel joints

Posted

Thr problem with paper plans is a considerable degree of expansion or contraction depending on humidity. You can be absolutely 'on' with that keel today,and be off several mm by the next day. It's like chasing a chimera. Madness will ensue!

 

Two solutions:

 

1) Take a known scale measurement  such as keel length and apply a scale rule against your work. 

 

2) Produce a scale drawing on Mylar sheet. It is dimensionally stable regardless of humidity. Use that rather than a paper plan. 

 

The second solution is one I've used now for decades, since I discovered paper plans were a snare and delusion for accurate work. Sure, it's more work, but saves my sanity in the long run! The photo is the prelude to my current project, the South Carolina, ex L'Egyptian.

IMG_4330.jpg

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Posted
5 hours ago, druxey said:

The second solution is one I've used now for decades, since I discovered paper plans were a snare and delusion for accurate work. Sure, it's more work, but saves my sanity in the long run! The photo is the prelude to my current project, the South Carolina, ex L'Egyptian.

Fortunately we keep our house fairly well controlled in terms of temperature and humidity so I'm hoping that there is minimal dimensional changes going on here! For this project I will make use of the dimensions listed in the monograph as well as the plans.

 

I had read about your use of Mylar in your books and it may be wise for me to think in this direction for future projects. This certainly seems to be a situation where it would be valuable to have CAD files which don't appear to be available for ANCRE publications. But I do have a project in the wings that needs to be done in the next couple of years for a local non-profit. They want I model of a Mackinaw boat and I have agreed to make one for them. Still not sure what draught I will work from, but it appears that I will need to draw the plans myself - it could be a good introduction for me for working with Mylar. 

 

I am very much looking forward to seeing the result of your current project; South Carolina (ex L'Indien?) is such a beautiful frigate!

 

Greg

Posted

Just a quick update:

 

It's taken a few days but the fore-foot (b) and stem (c) are connected, shaped and ready to accept the apron (g) as well as the first section of the rising wood (e1). I expect that it will take quite a few more hours of careful shaping to get g and e1 nicely fayed to b and c. The fore-foot (h1) already is shaped to fit correctly to b (and to the next part of the false keel h2).

ForefoottoStemJoint.jpg.4c7b81e148c25835ad8ce69ce2384541.jpg

Posted

I milled the scarf joining the apron and rising wood segment, then glued the pieces together and set them under glass for more than a day. My plan is to shape the fore side of the subassembly so it matches with the previously made section. Then I will shape the inner side followed by milling the more delicate scarf on the end of the rising wood piece.

 

image.jpeg.dc40d9fc8e6d5410648de763b8e4b533.jpeg

Posted

It's not only the problem which David mentioned. It's also a simple problem working with wood (and also other materials). If you cut and grind your wooden parts 100% exactly to the line, your model keel will be 0.4 to 0.5 mm longer than planned (depends if you have 5 or 6 parts). The glue needs also some space. My experience say that you have to think on 0.1mm for every joint. If you add some thin paper for the caulking you need at minimum 0.15 to 0.2mm for the joint.

Especially at the keel this gives your model some extra length.

With manually cutted parts you can't avoid this. 

Regards Christian

 

Current build: HM Cutter Alert, 1777; HM Sloop Fly, 1776 - 1/36

On the drawing board: English Ship Sloops Fly, 1776, Comet, 1783 and Aetna, 1776; Naval Cutter Alert, 1777

Paused: HMS Triton, 1771 - 1/48

"Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it." Salvador Dali

Posted

Excellent progress.  We look forward to watching these joints come together, step by careful step.  IMO, they can make or break a model.

 

You are several months ahead of my latest project.  The mobile shipyard is still working on frames.  We did have a friend deliver a package of pearwood stock to our current campground, for the keel and rising wood.

 

So, workers here are already planning the steps and process for laying the keel and stem/stern pieces.  I will continue to follow closely to glean what I can from your techniques and experience! Thanks for the great pictures and process descriptions!

Posted
8 hours ago, AnobiumPunctatum said:

It's not only the problem which David mentioned. It's also a simple problem working with wood (and also other materials). If you cut and grind your wooden parts 100% exactly to the line, your model keel will be 0.4 to 0.5 mm longer than planned (depends if you have 5 or 6 parts). The glue needs also some space. My experience say that you have to think on 0.1mm for every joint. If you add some thin paper for the caulking you need at minimum 0.15 to 0.2mm for the joint.

Especially at the keel this gives your model some extra length.

With manually cutted parts you can't avoid this. 

All points well taken - expanding / contracting plans and wood, together with the fact lines on a drawing have width.

 

I won't be adding any paper for caulking and yes, glue does take up space. I hope to keep a good eye on the accumulated length / minimize the chance for expansion by keeping track of not just the dimensions of each individual part, but also that of assemblies. So here, the combined width of the apron / stem is as important as the width of the apron and stem individually.

 

Of course finishing  individual parts to the exterior the associated plan lines will result in joined pieces to include the thickness of two copies of the lines from the plan plus space taken by glue - so one line width plus glue too much.  Finishing individual pieces to where the plan line nearly disappears (on both sides of a joint) keeps the joined combined piece(s) dimensions closer to what the goal is. 

 

Either way, assume if one had modeled a keel to be 850mm and ended up 0.5mm in excess of the overall keel length, the length for this assembly l will still be within 0.06% of the desired length [ (0.5 / 850) x 100 = 0.06% ] - for me, I'd call that a win! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...