Jump to content

allanyed

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Content count

    1,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About allanyed

  • Rank
    Special Contributor
  • Birthday 04/25/1947

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo
    allan@mascaraplus.com
  • Skype
    allan.yedlinsky

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ave Maria, Florida
  • Interests
    Golf, fishing, ship modeling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,449 profile views
  1. Lacking any other contemporary information, the sided and moulded (in and out) dimensions of the floors and futtocks can be found in the scantlings of the 1719 and 174 Establishments, the Shipbuilders Repository of 1788 and Steel's Elements and Practices book of 1805. You can find some of these in Goodwin and a few other books or all of them in Scantlings of Royal Navy Ships. None of these may apply to your ship, but will at least give an idea on how the moulded and sided dimensions reduced as they rise. Allan
  2. Ferit, Perhaps the below will help you. This is from a British ship of 1803. The dimensions are for a 1/4" = 1 foot scale model. Looking at the coaming in your photo, if it the kit is accurate, this appears to be from much earlier as the coaming is quite shallow compared to later years. Allan
  3. Further to Frankie's comments, rule of thumb that I learned back in my boating days was that the amount of anchor rode (chain and/or line) let out should be about 5 to 7 times the depth, so if there is even only 20 feet of water, that is at least 100 feet of rode let out. A lot depends on the type of bottom, wind and speed of the tide. Question, would the Bluenose and other similar schooners have used a rode of all chain or combination of rope and chain? Allan
  4. This may not be of any help to you at this point, but on the "old" ships the decks were holystoned which gave them a whiter versus grey finish. Holly is an excellent wood to give this look. Allan
  5. Welcome to the fray Bruce! Allan
  6. Hi If you would be so kind, please let us know a little more. What is your name? What ship? Is it a kit, POF, or POB? Different solutions depending on the type of build. You will surely get some responses, but need to share a little more information. Thanks and welcome to MSW Allan
  7. I strongly urge you to read the tutorials here on planking. If the strakes are properly cut (straight strips are not good for much of the planking) and pre-bent while wet then left to dry, there should be no edge setting issues. Walnut is a beautiful wood, but not for ship model planking, IMHO, other than perhaps for the wales to give the dark contrast rather than painting. If you can, use a more appropriate wood such as Costello box, pear or some such. If you follow the tutorials, clamping is not needed for the most part. Where clamps are required, Ed Tosti has provide a lot of information on clamps in his threads and in the Naiad books. Just one opinion based on my own experience over the years. Allan
  8. Thanks for the cudos Wayne, it is very much appreciated. I have found, in using it myself, there are a few errors due to my less than stellar typing abilities, but they are glaring and easy to pick up if they happen to be a dimension needed for a given build. Allan
  9. Regarding English ships of war, it varied with the year. In 1627 and 1640 the main mast was 2.4 times the beam. In 1670 it related to the length of the keel and beam. In 1719 it related to the beam but was a different proportion for each rating. For example for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rates of 80 guns it was 2.28 the beam, and for 3rd rates of 70 guns it was 2.32, 4th rates of 60 guns 2.34, 4th rates of 50 guns 2.36. 1794 it was the total of the lower deck length and extreme beam divided by 2. James Lees Masting and Rigging gives such information on every mast and yard as well as rigging details. Need to know more about what ship/year/nationality you are referring to in order to be more definitive. Lees book is a must in my opinion. Allan
  10. Thanks everyone for your input. I will chock it up to experimental on paper, if not in practice. Even if in practice, and an assumption that it did not work well, it would likely have been redone in the more commonly known fashion. At least that is my story and I will stick to it until proven otherwise. Thanks again! Allan
  11. Thanks Brian and Mark. Your answers are among the several I have considered. But, before I change a contemporary drawing, I would love to find some other examples or something definitive. Another interesting thing on this drawing is the body plan(s) which show both port and starboard for the forward stations and port and starboard for the aft stations. This was a first for me as well as the cathead. Allan
  12. I have come across something that I have not seen before. The cathead on the profile drawing of Antelope 1703 shows the cathead angled up and aft, not up and forward as seen on other plans and contemporary models. In looking at photos of models and plans of late 17th and early 18th century British ships, none that I have seen show the cathead angled aft. Has anyone seen this configuration before? Thanks Allan
  13. My pleasure Ron. Just keep in mind those are dimensions for 17th century and Norske Love is 18th century so these dimensions may not be correct. Cheers
  14. Mark, It is the Hampton Court, 1709 Allan
  15. Ron I looked for a Norske Love to get a better idea on the year, but cannot find a Norske love from the 17th Century. I found two from the 18th century including the Norske Love 1765 kit by Billings. If this is your model, any information from 17th century ships I gave may be inappropriate for such an 18th century ship. The information I have is for a British ship not a Scandinavian ship so may be off anyway. Regardless, here goes if anyone is interested in an English ship from the late 17th century...... I cannot find if the following are based on contempary drawings, scantlings, documents or the wreck, but looking at the deck plans for Lenox in The Restoration Warship, the planks for the gundeck are 14" wide at midships. The upper deck about 11.5" at midships. The lengths vary but are about 30 feet long. The shift shown is a 3 butt pattern for the most part. The Orlop deck planks do not shift as they are laid on the recess cut into the top edges of the beams and all appear to be about 12" wide. Quarter deck and poop deck planks appear to be 9" wide at their respective forward ends and taper to about 6" at the aft end. The taper will depend on the athwartships dimension differences at each end. The forecastle planks are 9" wide at their aft end and taper appropriately. There is no joggling of planks on these three decks. There is no appearance of anchor stock planking on the outboard planks of the gun decks as found in later periods. The Norske Love could very well have had anchor stock planking on the outboard 3 or 4 strakes. Allan

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model shipcraft.

The Nautical Research Guild puts on ship modeling seminars, yearly conferences, and juried competitions. We publish books on ship modeling techniques as well as our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, whose pages are full of articles by master ship modelers who show you how they build those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you what details to build.

Logo

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
×