Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (Only 44 donations so far out of 49,000 members - C'mon guys!) ×

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. It's not british, so French would be an option. btw: what was the reason the French went for these extreme ships? Large tumblehome on many of them, in this case a very low freeboard, combined with a very high superstructure. Jan
  2. I don't know how the Corel is for the Wasa, but for a contemporaneous ship (Prins Willem) they are sometimes completely off.... Quite a few modern (English) rigging solutions, in stead of 17th century rigging. Jan
  3. The whole anchor on one knot..... I don't think that will hold in a rough sea.... Jan
  4. It looks very much like an Cyclops-class coastal defence iron-clad... Jan
  5. i was surprises to. See a ship so deep below thesurface. quite uncommon inour parts of THE world And yes, my pic isoneof Waker <(ex Solo, ex SmitHouston)) jan Ps i dontliketingonanipad.......
  6. Again slightly too early (before confirmation of my answer), the next one. She had three names over her life, all with their own, very distinctive colourscheme Jan
  7. oops: Arabia Jan
  8. When I realised it was an excavation of a sidewheel steamer, it turned out to be relatively easy. Even without a google-pic search Jan
  9. I guess because he's otherwise loosing track of were he has been spraying his top-coat. (resultingin an uneven finish, because of the colour difference between the base coat and the top-coat.) But that's a mere guess, I'm also not a paint person..... Jan
  10. Wreck between the mountains? Noah's ark would be too obvious I think ..... Jan
  11. I'm going to give this one to Werik: Actually it is HrMs Heimdall, one of the steam powered gun boats of the Dutch navy. She looks a bit like an accomaodatioship, as she was refitted as mine-sweeping vessel. (were the gun used to be, a kind of 'shed-like' accomodation was erected.) With gun they looked like this: Jan
  12. Nope, but again, correct class. Jan
  13. Close, very, very close.... She's not an accomodation ship. Jan
  14. Just before I was to turn of my PC. Something completely different. Jan
  15. Giving her build-date and builder is as good as tellin gshe was named SS Namdo Wrecked by a seamine in 1944 Jan
  16. 1910-1920 tramper? Quite a lot to choose fomr, so give us some time Jan
  17. Unless Werik is an alias for Piet, in that case it's O19 Jan
  18. Andy, why do you think so? I wouldn't dare to do so Actually the picture I found was labelled "USS Sable (sistership of USS Wolverine)" As the pic is rather widespread on the internet, I did a left-right flip to make google-picture-search slightly more difficult. Jan
  19. Took me quite a while this one.... A quite sure the next one is gone in minutes (even though Andy is not here at the moment) Jan
  20. diving in Toulon Tromblon (1875) It was the hint on the year that did it for me Jan
  21. Never knew the Frech did build so many strange vessels Jan
  22. still existing as a famous dive site or so? Jan
  23. No there isns'nt: the turning of the dead-eyes is the result of the tension in the lanyards connecting the dead-eayes. It becomes less when you hve a lower tension, but then your shrouds will not be straight.... It happens almost Always, and in your case it is quite pronounced, as the distance between the deadeyese is large enough tot have almost a halve turn between them. It will become slightly less when you start your ratlines: have the spacer in place when you start doing your ratlines, and make sure the dead-eyses are facing front. The combined ratlines will make it less easier for the shouds/dedeyse to twist. Jan
×
×
  • Create New...