Jump to content

Jim Lad

Moderators
  • Posts

    8,296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Lad

  1. Tony, At a scale of 1/64, the scale frames would be way under 0.5mm in size, if you're looking at scale framing. John
  2. I somehow seem to have missed you log Ilhan, so I'm just catching up. All up to your usual high standard, I see! John
  3. Thanks, Bob. I usually have one model on to go at the museum and one at home, but at the moment Stag is the only one! John
  4. Michael, Tha shrouds do look a bit light on - unless, of course, you have more modern rigging and you're using wire for the shrouds. The set-up with the deadeyes closer together looks the 'ants pants'! John
  5. Jim, I'd steer away from Balso for anything other than packing pieces or rough mock-ups. It's really too soft and spongy for much else. John
  6. Thank you Pat, Chuck and Janos. The really frustrating thing at the moment is that the hull is at the museum and the spars are here with me at home. I'm hoping to get all the blocks rigged on the spars before I'm next in at the museum, but I'm itching to get on with the rigging!! John
  7. Thank you one and all for your kind comments. Although there's still a lot to be done on her, I can indeed now see the light at the end. It must almost be time to start planning for the next one! The mast hoops are simple - sections of brass tube treated with blackening solution. John
  8. A small update at last. I've been having some computer problems (Windows died) but all seems well now - that's why this update is a bit late. Last Wednesday at the museum I got a little done, but spent most of my time talking to visitors and discussing the museum with one of the staff, rsther than in modelling. Never mind - there's always next time! Most of the hardware in now fitted to the mast and I must say I'm rather pleased with the overall look. Everything is just sitting the loose at the moment. Hopefully I can get a bit of serious rigging done next time I'm in. John
  9. It's good to see her progressing, Tom. I'm sorry to tell you, but resin casting is always a pretty wasteful process. John
  10. Hamilton, I think shroud cleats on the lower shrouds would be appropriate. Have a look on www.Abebooks.com for a copy of Lees - you'll pick it up for a lot less than $100! John
  11. Looking much better, Michael! Check out your stock of smack and cutter photos - I think you'll find that the deadeyes should be much closer together (i.e. shorter tackles) in the final version. John
  12. Michael, I've had a computer problem for a couple of days and am just catching up again. Great stuff as usual, mate! John
  13. Looking good, Popeye! Take no notice of Andy - he's probably worried about your lobster boat crud invading his nice clean ship! John
  14. It's always a pleasure to look at your 'baby', Rusty! John
  15. Petersson's book is a good introduction, but it's based on a frigate of 1785, so there will be differences in the rigging compared to a ship of 1720. John
  16. Hamilton, Naval ships of the same period and same size (in the same navy, of course) would be rigged alike, but details of the rigging may have been changed over time to suite the peculiarities of the particular ship or the preferences of the captain, but if you rig the same you can't be far wrong. At the beginning of one of my books (written by the First Lieutenant of the ship) where he describes his ship, he simply states, "She was rigged as a fifty gun ship." He obviously thought that his naval readers would immediately understand the details of her rigging! John
×
×
  • Create New...