Jump to content

Sanding off laser burn from bulkheads?


Recommended Posts

I searched this subject multiple ways but found nothing. Perhaps I didn't use correct search tags... So the question is;

 

Does it make a difference in how well glue adheres to bulkheads during planking if the laser burns are not removed? I know in the fairing process some will be removed by default. Do wood parts in general adhere better or worse to laser burned wood?

 

Warm Regards,

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it make a difference in how well glue adheres to bulkheads during planking if the laser burns are not removed? I know in the fairing process some will be removed by default. Do wood parts in general adhere better or worse to laser burned wood?

Bill

At first I agreed with Jeff. After all, wood that is 'burnt' should not have the fibers to grab and adhere to with glue. But I decided to run a little test.

I took a few pieces (shown below) and used 'carpenters glue" (PVA) to bond three of them together. You can see burnt to burnt, blank to blank, and for good measure blank to burnt.

post-246-0-51275800-1384651294_thumb.jpg

The clamps apply about the same amount of pressure during this glue-up.

post-246-0-10696300-1384651311.jpg

 

I don't have a testing machine, but tomorrow morning I will put each one in a vise and hit with a hammer sideways.

I will let you know how it goes tomorrow. You know, glue should be given some time to cure!!!

 

BTW 'Burnt to burnt' is to the right and 'blank to blank' is in the background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good experiment for the wood you are using, thin and cutting quickly should result in light charring. From what I have seen on this board, bulkheads appear to be charred much more, probably because of the increased thickness and more durable woods or as some shown in build logs are made from plywood. Charcoal would make a poor joint, If just discolored by heat but not charred, might be fine as is, a light sanding to remove any loose material would be good insurance.

jud

Edited by jud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, here is what I did and the results.

 

I clamped the glued up piece (started with the 'burnt to bare') in a wood vise. I used another piece of wood leaning against the top part and hit it with my calibrated hammer. I did the same thing with the other two, hitting it with about the same force.

post-246-0-82933100-1384703733.jpg

 

All three pieces sheared where I had clamped it and none broke at the glue joint.

post-246-0-40052600-1384703734.jpg

 

I then tried to break the remaining parts with pliers. Indeed the 'bare to bare' splintered some more but not at the glue line (top left). The 'burnt to burnt' (right) broke a sliver at the glue line, and the third one ('burnt to bare') did break through the burnt joint leaving burn marks on the bare side.

It felt like it took about the same amount of force to break each one.

post-246-0-60793000-1384703734_thumb.jpg

 

My conclusion is that it makes very little difference if you sand the burnt edge or not. Al least with the glue I used. I suggest that others might try something like this with other adhesives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After careful analysis of the data presented, it would appear that an alternative conclusion may also prove viable.  Specifically, the glue joints in each case are stronger than the wood itself.  It is suggested that further experimentation be conducted to determine the strength of the joints in the tension, rather than in the shear,  mode.  This might best be accomplished with the use of either an 'Instron' device or the application of opposing forces using two identical teams of draught horses

 

Pending the publication of the results of the modified experimental design, I shall continue to get the 'brown stuff' off prior to gluing  :D  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they would be just as strong,but didn't post anything for fear of walking into a hornets nest :D  :D The ash produced by laser cutting is on the floor under the machine.The black  is purely discolouration unless it was 4pm on a friday when they were cut :D .You still end up cleaning the edges though because the laser cutting pattern is tapered just like waterjet,This means all cut edges aren't square anyway unless of course you buy a kit that is cnc routed.

Kind Regards Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sound point made; Tension separation would represent plank/bulkhead adhesive failure more clearly. I must also concur that draft horse teams, specifically cloned to rule out any deviation in the baseline designed of the testing guidelines. While this is continued to be reviewed by executive committee, I too will continue to remove all charring that remains in question here above. ;):)

 

 

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that you can just wash the residue off but I'm sure someone has tried that. Perhaps the implication was just wash off as much residue as possible before gluing.

 

The other problem with laser cutting is that the cut is not always perpendicular. The thicker the piece, the more exagerated this is. Did you note a larger gap on one side vs the other Jay?

 

Dave Stevens, of the LumberYard, addresses these issues on his website http://www.dlumberyard.com/oneida-laser.html

Edited by dvm27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original question did not imply that bulkhead parts were to be bonded with 'burnt to burnt', but I just included that because I was curious. To do that, however, I flipped the two pieces so the edges mated and did not have any or much of a gap. Yes, the 'burnt to bare' did have a small gap and that is why it probably broke the way it did with the pliers. But even that one did not break at the glue joint when hit with a hammer. The PVA is known for a limited amount of 'gap filling', unfilled CA glue does not, and epozy is very good in that regards.

 

When you plank a hull with bulkheads, I think it is more important to minimize the gaps than whether or not the edge had a dark residue from the laser cutting. In other words, bevel the edge as necessary towards the bow and stern and don't worry about some dark smudges towards the center. That is my opinion. If you want to spent the extra time to make it look bare, go at it.

 

I am sure we all have to agree that planking will come loose more easily in the curves sections, but even where I spliced two planks on a bulkhead, I had very little problems bonding the two to make a joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Hime, I have a suggestion for you. Since you live in Madison, you should go to the Forest Products Lab there and ask one of the engineers if they could run a similar set of experiments. Perhaps they already can provide you with a better opinion than mine.

FPL is well known for the work they have done in testing all kinds of wood structures.

 

BTW Rather than tension, I think a cleavage or peel test would be more meaningful. Planks bonded to bulkheads will want to 'peel' loose. I don't foresee much 'tension' nor 'shear' in those joints.

Edited by Modeler12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When faced with this problem previously, someone mentioned that scraping the char away with a single edge razor works well and removes very little wood.

Tried it. It is a very good and efficient method. May seem a little daunting at first, but really, it is easy and takes almost no time at all. I did not, however, try gluing the charred parts together. I will be interested to hear the results of the tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...