Jump to content

rwiederrich

NRG Member
  • Posts

    5,083
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rwiederrich

  1. Model railroading are always my alternate sites for accessories....like chain. Cast Your Anchor's supplier no longer provides them with the 42 lpi chain apparently. That is where I have purchased my chain for years....too bad. I could get it in 6ft lengths too.. Rob
  2. Thank everyone for the fine comments. Sometime prior to her 1877 San Fran image she relinquished her stunn sail booms. Probably because she became a West coast carrier, rarely going far South and not rounding the Horn any more. Accommodating doldrums was no longer going to be a burden for her. The true reason stun sails are carried. Honestly, I’ve spent more time lately, planning the addition of the futtock shrouds and their dead eyes to actually be doing any work on Glory. I did add the bell and bell arm to the forecastle leading edge. Not much Rob
  3. I did a bit of minor work on the masts. Banding and adding the chain hoists. This kind of work takes time since making and blackening eye bolts takes time. Rob
  4. I use 42 LpI chain for all my 1/96 clippers I blacken it without flaking issues. I have very good results with it. Cast Your Anchor is my supplier. Rob
  5. Ed while revisiting your log for the 1/96 version....I couldn't help but wonder if you ever got back to her and finished up her masting and rigging? It has only been nearly 6 years and I was wondering if you had found new fire within to take her to the finish line? I'm just now beginning the masting and rigging of my scratch 1/96 Glory of the Seas...myself. All the best, Rob
  6. Zoom up on the chain plate and see that it appears only one large iron bar is used for the chainplate on Glory. I would assume this is standard on all McKay clippers.
  7. I believe it was the former as you describe. I’ve built many McKay clippers and All my research points to iron bars/straps. Not like the Morgan, double chains. McKay spared no expense in his clipper construction, so I concluded they were the best and strongest in design and application. See these closeup pics. Rob
  8. You are doing it basically as I did. The trick is keeping the mast taper clean and scale accurate. The bands are generally 3 ft apart o/c. I had to work out the process myself and flubbed or gained experience on a previous test mast before I got it right. You’re doing great. Are you going to paint the chapel’s white and the masts varnished…..? Or possibly another scheme? Rob
  9. Thanks everyone, for the fine comments. I hope to finish up the mizzenmast mast today…….then I’ll move onto fixing the chain slings and prepping for shrouds. Rob
  10. Well, I hope that I can outdue her. Short of addition of sails....I will be foregoing them and focusing on mast and yard detail. Remembering that recreating her hull and its intricacies was my main goal....but I can't leave her there...I will be compelled to detail out her masting and rigging too. Thanks for supporting my McKay clipper habit. Rob
  11. The reuse of Revell's hull....made my conversion so much simpler. I was being creative. where I had no other immediate option. Even with my Donald McKay diorama...the hull is underwater...so no real issue exists, other then the scale issue. the diorama was created not merely for the ship, but what I could do with creating active large water. I will probably not complete this model...because hull accuracy is more my thing these days then when I begun this diorama.
  12. Like you Bruma, I wanted to hyper detail my Revell Kit. I used wood deadeyes and detailed her out as much as possible. I, however had a dioramic point...a true historical incident in CS life. The replacement of her jury rigged rudder. She was on the ways for repair, so her sails would have been removed and stowed for the duration of the repair. I appreciate your attention to detail, in making this fine model even that more impressive. Here is a pic of my award winning model. for your edification. Rob
  13. It would nearly be like the comparison of the CS to my GS. That drastic! That's how darn big the GR was. The main reason of many reasons why I had to build her for my collection. Thanks for the compliment Rich. I hope to finish up the main mast today after work. Rob
  14. I know……scale plays tricks on us. If my GR was in 1/96 she would be nearly 10” longer then GS and nearly as wider. She would be an enormous model. Probably as big as Vladimir’s 1/72 version of GS in comparison. GR looked larger also because of her unique stand that enlarged her perception . I have yet to devise a unique stand for Glory. Rob
  15. Funny….the GR was 1/128th and she is still longer(not bigger) then the GS. I didn’t realize that 1/96 would still be a big model…..since all my other 1/96 models are all small clippers compared to GS. She proves that compared to other like scaled clippers, Glory was large. Thanks for the fine compliment and your continued support. Rob
  16. George, you're flying now. She is shaping up nicely and the addition of all the detail makes her snap. I always build my clippers with some action going on....like an anchor being raised or loosely slung into place, it detracts from a full static display. Great job. Did you say you are going to make *built* lower masts? Can't wait to see your technique and results. Rob
  17. I’ve owned my workmate since I bought it new in 1980. It has been my mast holder for every clipper ship build since then. Great find, you’ll love it. What mine is doing right now Rob
  18. Vlad. I’ll put some feelers out and put my ear to the rail to see if there is anything I can do. Tough decision to let her go…..I know. Rob
×
×
  • Create New...