Jump to content

tmj

NRG Member
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tmj

  1. Middle gun deck going in. Learning from my previous mistake of trying to form the arch of my 'lower' gun deck, after it was built, I decided to 'pre-bend' this newest gun deck. It was not only a wise choice but also yielded much more consistent results! What I did was to cut my beams a bit longer than required and boil them in water, for 30 minutes, to totally saturate the wood with heat and moisture. I then pulled my hot/wet beams out of the boiling pot and quickly clamped them all into a sandwich between a radiused stainless-steel form and a flexible metal ruler as a backing. The metal ruler backing, and a few clamps insured that the wood would not try to 'kink' or go flat anywhere along the bend. I then baked this sandwich in the oven, @ 260 degrees for an hour then shut the oven off to let things cool down. Worked much better than using just a hot plank bender and a wooden form. After a few hours of cooling and drying I removed the clamps and was pleasantly surprised with the results. The arch was perfect on the first try! 😁

     

    Now, I need to frame in around the mast with addition support beams, forming a square that is the same dimensions of the mast, in the proper X/Y axis locations that I need to keep the mast accurately centered and canted. This additional framing will become my 'drilling-jig' to ensure that I get the mast hole correct on the first try. I'll then complete the planking, over the additional mast hole framing and finally remove the deck from the ship, drill the hole for the mast then put the deck back in. If you look at the mast and its hole on my lower gun deck, you'll see a perfect fit. I did the lower gun deck mast hole the exact same way, as I also did with the mast hole in the Orlop deck. I'll continue to use this same method of locating the mast holes for every deck on this build. It's the only way that I can think of to easily get the mast hole properly located for each deck, one deck at a time, without a lot of guessing, hoping and potential rework. 

     

    Nothing above the Orlop deck has been glued in place. The stanchions, ladders, gun decks, mast... all friction fitted and 100% loose!

     

    08 Oct 23.jpg

  2. Hello Allen.

    You just gave me an idea via the LOS thing! I seriously doubt that I will do this due to the amount of work it would require, but... that is also subject to exactly how many bolts would be required to sister a whole ships worth of frames together. 
    I have micro brass tubes that will fit inside of each other. I just checked, and these types of tubes are still readily available, on eBay, in the proper sizes for the 1:76 scale that I seek. 
    The simulated bolt up frames could be made via a 1mm O.D. brass tube, a .5mm O.D. brass tube, and a bundle of extremely fine copper wires twisted together. The 1mm tube is cut slightly proud of the thickness of the sistered frames. This tube would represent brass washers. The .5mm tube is treated with LOS and cut slightly proud of the 1mm tube and inserted into the 1mm tube. This would represent the nuts. Lastly, some extremely fine copper wire 'strands' are bundled up and twisted together, via a drill motor, until the twisted copper wires will properly fit inside of the .5mm tube... treated with LOS and cut a bit proud of the .5mm tube. The twisted wire would represent the 'all threads'/bolts.
    I'm wondering if the brass tube would darken less than the twisted pure copper wire, creating contrast, after being treated with the LOS, due to the brass tube also containing zinc?  
    This would obviously be a lot of work. Each tube would have to be dressed up on the ends and also cleaned out, with teeny, tiny drill bits after being cut, to reshape the tube, remove burrs and allow the next tube, or twisted wires to be fitted inside. 


    After all is said and done... would the 'micro-fruits' of such labor even be noticeable? 

     

    Just a thought. Figured that I might as well throw it out there... for whatever it's worth.

       Tom...  
     

  3. On 9/30/2023 at 7:26 PM, allanyed said:

     Do the kit ladders all have only three steps?   The distance between the orlop deck planks to the top of the lower gun deck planking is about 80".   

    Thanks

    Allan

    I never thought too much about the scale of those ladders until you mentioned it. They simply 'looked' good, and that's all I was going on, until now. "Now", those ladders are really starting to bug me! I might need to scratch build some new ones with proper scale dimensions and realistic steps... @#$%! This is reason #967 why I really don't want to buy any more pre-manufactured kits. In all honesty, the only thing that I have truly used, as intended, from this kit is the ridged frame that forms the hull shape of this ship model's section, which is probably not accurate either!        

  4. Support stanchions are complete, save my needing to clean them up a bit. Now, I need to figure out how I want to populate the Orlop deck with furnishings, stuff, etc. This is my first idea, for the first half of the Orlop deck. Three surgeon's tables being used by the crew for mess tables, gambling, whatever. Wooden crates for benches and chairs to sit on. Not sure where to go on the opposite side of the deck just yet. I might even change this design. 

     

     

     

    Orlop Funiture~1.jpeg

  5. You might be able to use a jewelers saw to cut out the windows. Drill a hole in each windowpane to feed the saw blade through, then cut out each separate pane of glass. That's the only way I can think of to get square corners. If the metal is too thick, and breaks your sawblades, use a Dremel and grind away at the back of the part until the metal is thin enough to easily cut. 

  6. 23 hours ago, allanyed said:

     Do the kit ladders all have only three steps?   The distance between the orlop deck planks to the top of the lower gun deck planking is about 80".   

    Thanks

    Allan

    No, there are actually 4 steps, which is still a really tall step (around 20" between steps). That's what comes with the kit. I suppose that sailors had longer legs back then than they do today! 😗

    There are a 'lot' of problems with this model. When I bought this, I had no real direction. I just wanted to build a ship model that looked good. Historical accuracy was not a part of the plan. That changed and I now have something that will 'never' be correct. I'm now using it as a training aid to hone some skills for my next project. My next project 'WILL' have a more proper, historically accurate direction to follow. My current plan with this kit bash is to simply do the best I can do, with what I have to work with. I want the model to look nice when all is said and done, but I don't want to put too much effort into making corrections. I just want to get 'er done and move on to something with a more promising future. Everyone has to start somewhere. This is my start...    

  7. Gary,

    Is there any chance that maybe a 'hybrid' system could have been employed? A limber system using short lengths of rope as the main component, with a link of heavier chain tied in the middle, for extra weight, to deal with the more 'stubborn' sediments and blockages? I'm reaching, I know, albeit. I can actually see a rope simply gliding over a lot of heavy sediment with little effect, just as Bob explained. I can 'also' see a knotted rope doing almost the exact same thing unless the knots were tied large enough to occupy most of the internal space within the limber channel. Maybe a rope with a heavier chain link tied into it could have been employed for dislodging any clogs? Sailors can be rather resourceful when it comes to making dirty jobs a bit easier. 

    This subject is really going to bug me!     

    Hybrid Limber.jpeg

  8. 14 hours ago, Bob Cleek said:

    While a rope would obviously serve in a pinch........

    Hmm, back to those limber chains, again. "I remember that discussion!" It was mentioned that chain was prohibitively expensive back then, therefor knotted rope was most likely used, so I switched from chain to the rope idea. Now, rope is a bad idea and something like copper chains were likely used! I'm glad that I haven't added any limber 'things' yet! 😁 

  9. 26 minutes ago, HAIIAPHNK said:

    I don't know how appropriate it is to equate this with the usual brooms and mops this item is, but it is also part of the cleaning process. This is a limber rope.

    This is 'very' appropriate, and yes. I have limber ropes on my list of needful things to display on my sectional build. I'm going to have short, about 1cm to 1.5cm lengths of knotted ropes hanging out of the limber channels on both ends of my model. Greetings and thank you for chiming in!

  10. Still thinking forward and scratching my head. These are the barrels that will eventually be going into the hold, etc. Not knowing how many I will truly need for this build, I purchased fifty. They are of a proper scale size for 'large' wooden barrels in Victory 1:98 scale. I'd like to find smaller barrels too, but so far this is the smallest that I've been able to find. I might have to turn smaller barrels myself, should I really want smaller barrels scattered around the ship. I'll have to think about that...

      

    Barrels 26 Sept.jpg

  11. One thing that I have never seen depicted, in sectional models, are the general 'every day' items used to keep the ship's decks clean, etc. There's no such thing as a ship without proper 'janitorial' tools!

    Other than brooms, mops and buckets... what other janitorial 'devices' would have been found on the decks of HMS Victory in 1805? Also, weren't certain 'stones' used to occasionally 'grind' the surface of the decks to a smooth, splinter free surface? Where would this kind of gear/equipment typically be stowed upon the different decks of a ship like this?       

  12. Pump housing for the Orlop deck is now complete, save a bit of touchup and finish work. The housing is glued to the bottom of the lower gun deck. I needed to anchor the pump housing to the bottom of that gun deck in order to provide a fixed point of reference, for obtaining measurements, that would result in the completed pump house fitting tightly atop the Orlop deck once the gun deck was slid into place. Another reason for gluing the pump house to the gun deck is because I also need to be able to remove the gun deck, and the pump housing to give me free, open access to the Orlop deck for the addition of Orlop deck furnishings. I'd much rather be able to locate/set furnishings via looking straight down on them. Much easier to do it that way than to try and sneak things in later, with tweezers, between two decks offering very little space to work within... as well as depth perception issues that would surely affect easy and proper alignment/location of the furnishings.   

     

    25 Sept 23~2.jpg

    Here is the lower gun deck and the pump housing slid into place. The second story of my pump housing looks a bit off of center in this photo, but it's not. Just a bad camera angle making it look off. I need to learn to pay attention to such details while taking pictures. 

     

    25 Sept 23.jpg

  13. I've been experimenting with my 'Pigs of Iron' ballast effect. My first attempt in creating these things was a successful 'failure'! I say 'successful' because my failure, in the method I used, taught me just how it must be done. I'll get it right next time. In the meantime, I'm dry fitting false stanchions and ladders atop my Orlop deck, as visual aids, to help me plan ahead. The curvature of my deck is now proper, due to the false stanchions, and I can now finish planking and trimming out my well housing seeing as how I now know exactly where the bottom of the pump well housing will be. After completing the well house, I need to figure out just how I intend to furnish the Orlop deck, build the furniture, then fabricate the 'actual' support stanchions prior to making everything permanent. It's a slow go, but it's 'going'!         

    23 Sept~2 23.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...