Jump to content

Jim Lad

Moderators
  • Posts

    9,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Lad

  1. Eye bolts up to your usual standard I see, Michael! John
  2. Tom, We're talking about a cutter built in and used for work in tropical waters! Coppering was very common in small craft used in northern Australian waters - even a lot of the pearling luggers were coppered. John
  3. A delightful figurehead, Sherry. Have you done much carving before? I'd go with the others and say just use whatever finish you're already using. You might like to try your finish first on a scrap of the same wood just to be sure that you like the result. John
  4. Thanks for that, Andy. These ships are very different to the ones I'm used to. Although loading would be easy, didn't the very narrow hatches impede discharge? John
  5. Per, Following the hull lines is the way in which hull planking is laid in real ships, but you'll find that you'll probably need some fairly wide pieces on some parts of the hull, especially at the stern, as the plank width will vary quite a bit. It will also be difficult to lay strips the full length of the hull doing this - remember that on real ships the planks were only 20 to 30 feet long. John
  6. Very well done, Ilhan. She's a real credit to you - a beautifully constructed model. John
  7. That's not boring, Russ, that's lovely deck work! John
  8. Nicely planked, Freek - seems like you need the skills of a barrel maker for that hull! By the way, your little submarine seems to have quite a spectator gallery in that dry dock photo. John
  9. I think we can now say that you've officially started, Andy. Looks like there's some very nice detail moulded into the hull. John
  10. Hmmm. Maybe the bits of Cherry Ballart I've been using have a better grain. I have to say that moulding could be crisper, but then we all know how brutal close up photos can be. John
  11. Tom - a agree with your assessment from that second photo - a flared top and two narrow flat bands. Michael - great was to create a realistic flare. Thanks for the explanation. John
  12. Yes, Tom, it would just be for strength. I'll be interested to see what your other photos show. John
  13. Ollie, We tend to think that cutters were clinker built, but many were not - especially the later ones. King's painting that you're using for your avatar looks like she's carvel planked, but his other painting, 'Mermaid and the Maccassa Trepangers' isn't quite so clear as to planking. What do you think? John
  14. Don't worry, Steve, I do that all the time! John
  15. Small or big progress, Russ, she's heading in the right direction! John
  16. Tom, I hate to be play devil's advocate, but when I study that photo graph closely, I'm sure I can see two reinforcing rings on the funnel. John
  17. In his book 'The Arming and Fitting of English Ships of War', Brian Lavery quotes a document from the Public records Office (PRO106/2508) which gives anchor sizes and numbers for various classes of ships in 1784. While your exact ship isn't there, the following are close. 26 gun ship: 4 anchors of 25 cwt 1 of 7 1/2 cwt 1 of 3 1/2 cwt Sloop of 268 to 300 tons 3 of 20 cwt 1 of 7 cwt 1 of 3 1/2 cwt Hope this is helpful. John
  18. Nice to see another model of a ship with propellers, Andy. The additional midship sections are interesting. Do they also come with addition deck and hatch sections? John
×
×
  • Create New...