Jump to content

shipaholic

Members
  • Posts

    517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by shipaholic

  1. Hi Mike

     

    The standing part is attached to the yardarm. Here is a pic from Lees "Masting and Rigging of English Ships of War" Also a pic from the AL Endeavour instructions, and a pic of my dusty old AL Endeavour showing the rope attached to the yard arm like shown in Longridge's "Anatomy of Nelsons Ships". Note that single blocks are used on the yard arm. The AOTS has double blocks for some reason :o .

     

    Its also interesting how the full size replica Endeavour vessel has the jeers set up differently with three single blocks :huh:

     

    Cheers

    Steve

    post-819-0-85884100-1439168267_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-25772000-1439168294_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-21658100-1439168331_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-64866400-1439168551_thumb.jpg

  2. Thanks Pat looks like between the other Steve and myself we have answered your question. You must be using too thick a thread if it wont fit through the holes. I have been very careful to get the scale of my rope right and I am surprised how thin the mizzen lower shrouds are, and thats at 1:51 scale. They look thick in the photo I just posted but they are only 0.75mm.

     

    Steve

  3. Hi Mike

    I can't find in any of the books I have that describes the fore top gallant shroud being served. They probably were for the same reason as the topmost and lower shrouds shrouds were - to prevent chafing by the sails. I will serve mine.

    I will stop pointing out faults in the AOTS, people treat it like the bible and get offended I think.

     

    Cheers

    Steve

  4. Thanks Mike yes its interesting how each of us develop our own methods to achieve something.

     

    Whilst on the subject of the shrouds;

     

    Another one where I believe the AOTS is completely wrong. Marquardt states in his commentary that Endeavour had two topmast backstays because Cook wrote in his Journal that both backstays broken - hello! I think Cook might have meant both the starboard and port one. He has changed the size of the main mast deadeyes in his drawings to suit his argument. If you look at both of the original draughts there is only one small deadeye for the topmast backstay whereas AOTS shows two small deadeyes.

     

    Also (correct me if I'm wrong anyone) AOTS shows the wrong arrangement for the topgallant shrouds. The topgallant shrouds are led through holes in the trestle trees down around the futtock staves and down to the top where they are lashed to an eye secured around the lower topmast deadeyes.

     

    I think you guys must hate me for pointing out faults with AOTS, sorry

     

    Cheers

    Steve

    post-819-0-47418400-1434967053_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-61468500-1434967479_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-94124800-1434967588_thumb.jpg

    post-819-0-34579600-1434967642_thumb.jpg

  5. Thanks Mike

     

    I am still deciding which way to go with the mainstay, I could be wrong but I think the replica vessel is the correct way, so I will probably do it like that, a collar around the bowsprit. I was going to do it like the AOTS and have even fitted a large eyebolt, but have changed my mind as I cannot find any reference other than the AOTS describing mainstay collars secured to eye bolts in the deck

     

    Cheers

    Steve

×
×
  • Create New...