Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! ×

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. Are you following Ketting wirh a fore-deck, or do you take the model as it is, without a forecastle-deck? That deck in the reconstruction is quite a debate, most scholars taking the view that it should not be there. Jan
  2. Hi Juzek, Which drawings do you use? Ketting or Corel? Jan
  3. That's a nice twist Do you have a picture of her in that rig? Jan
  4. Can you explain? New research showing tha she had no masts? Jan
  5. And the more practical question: are you able to represent these lines in the scale you are working with? Sometimes less is more With respect to your question: I guess it depends on the situation. When a ship is sailing, everything is there. In port during (un)loading, the sails are not removed, therefore these lines are not. During winter-stops, I guess most lines are removed, as the weather does have a (negative) effect on the quality of the lines. So everything needed to have the yards in place will remain, everything else is removed. Sometimes you see a model with full rigging, but without sails. In that case the lines are prevented from running loose with the help of knots and toggles. I like the look of it (although: only when blocks and lines are in scale), but I never saw a picture of these clippers fully rigged, without sails. in your case, I would take Cutty sark as she is in dry-dock as your reference: Standing rigging lifts and braces in place, all other removed. Jan
  6. Thats essentially what it is: two lines eized at the ends, forming a little eye in between. Jan
  7. Ofcourse you can fake the splice by a seizing. My point is the way you can seize the lines: one eye, with two standing lines. Jan
  8. Eyesplice, or horseshoe, I dont know what the correct one is. In your model it will look the same. Jan
  9. Option c, two llines with a sort of eye-splice i will look for a pic. Give me second. Jan
  10. And in most cases the yards are lowered when there are no sails attached. Jan
  11. Yes, completely. I was affarid that you would not model nelsons place of death. Would be an ommision to this otherwise great build Jan
  12. Make sure you cut enough for the middle gun deck (Assuming the lower one will ever be finished) Btw did you ever consider the thought of rippi g out the lower deck in order to install the orlop deck? Jan
  13. His photobucket-account did not change for a long time. I wonder whether something happened (or maybe he is just awfully busy in (re)writing HMS-Victory's building instructions....) Jan
  14. Just for my understanding of the size: what is the size of this 1:350 cat? Jan Btw the photo showed the cat in one of the gunbarrels
  15. Looks like a large model. Would still check on frams 8 an 9 though, if I were yiu. Jan
  16. Hi elijah, I dont understand the part you mean. Earlier posts show the deck as one part, including the waterways. What exactly is missing? Jan
  17. Or something Dutch: pacific cross roads has a HmS Tromp (cruiser) in 1:350. Should be a nice one. (Although, it is new, sothere won't be any after,arket...) Jan
  18. The figures look very nice indeed. Lots of panting though... Do you have all the framing now, or are you still missing parts? Jan
  19. How durable is that ezyline? it would be a real shame if the elastic material either slackens or even crumbles in a few years..... Jan
  20. Check this one: http://modelshipworldforum.com/ship-modeling-articles-and-downloads.php Lots of interesting stuff there. Jan
  21. perhaps you shouldn't have used the iron: it clearly states that it is not suited for heller stuff Jan
×
×
  • Create New...