Jump to content
MORE HANDBOOKS ARE ON THEIR WAY! We will let you know when they get here. ×

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. The advantage is that a bunch of oars on deck would look a bit bulky. The disadvantage is that your model needs some casing to protect the 'fragile' oars.... Jan
  2. For those of you who don't know: the lion is on the statenjacht Utrecht Jan
  3. Which Hoving-book do you use? You can always say that the luizenplecht is the small deck in front of the "bakschot" Jan
  4. We'll never, ever complain again over fiddly detials on our massive 1:100 scale ships. How many magnifiers do you use for this? Jan
  5. In how many issues will Vsa come to you? Jan
  6. Nothing wrong with the match. You won in the last minute Jan
  7. How are you going to do the ratlines ? It's increasibly small, fragile and looking good. Jan
  8. Hi Hans, That is a great looking ship! Two questions: am i correct in assumin a hulllength of around a meter? And second: when doing admirality, are you considering not to plank the hull? Jan
  9. Impressive modl, at 1/96. Would have to move to a larger dwelling, though Jan
  10. Hmmm..... Wondering... How does fully detailed look like in your definition? I wouldn't label this as schematic. More like: quite detailed. Jan
  11. Hi Kees, Looking good! Are you going to do the interior of the brigde on this one, or will there be faked glazing? Jan
  12. If kitmakers would provide enough rope and decent blocks, there is no need for bulk-pakages ...... The problem is that many provide kind of lousy rope, and blocks that fot their rope.... Jan
  13. And could the american producers please, please have a european agent? Getting kits around/through custums without damage (sometimes they open rattling packages with metal in them..) and at reasonable cost can be difficult and time-consuming. Jan
  14. With respect to scale: the current market seems to ask for large scale models, to give the opportunity for detailing. Although i understand that wish, for me this is the reson not to go for a kit next. I am (still) strugling with the rigging of a Corel kit of Prins Willem, but another kit resulting in a 90centimeter model is a nogo area: i simply don't have the space to get another one in. Next model is restricted to 40 cm max, either a relatively small ship at 1:50/1:96, or a slightly largership at 1:96/1:192 There used to be a Dutch firm that did some small ships, at 1:100. Resulting models about 25 centimets (that's 10 inch for you non-metrics:)) Rather basic kits, solid hull, partly precut, basic rigging, but great starter-kits, with quite a lot of detailing-options. Firm went backrupt, and no one else continued the range. Price of these kits was relatively low, which made them perfect starters for younger builders (toy shops where the main outlet for the firm). I did them all (one still unfinished after 25 years....) This is what i mean: my third kit, at age 16, 30 years outside a glass case Jan
  15. In Den Helder (netherlands) there is a nice example of such a transition-ship SS Bonaire, steam/sail, nicely shaped hull, etc. Would make a nice kit. Jan
  16. There is (was?) another thread on this topic. Overthere I posted that I would love to see a historically accurate kit at a resonable scale (1:96 or 1:192) of a Dutch two or threedecker, like the Gouden Leeuw. I would like: advanced, building time: long, price around 400 euro, (but higher is open for discussion) I would like a POF, but with the option to build the interior from th lower gundeck upwards. I would prefer serious wood, not the usual kit-stuff i would prefer historicall accurate i would prefer non-guilded, resin (?) 'carving' I would prefer fullguns, and not those silly half-guns. (At 1:192 resin casting is OK with me) I am not a large fan of an 'assembly kit' in which all parts are lasercut, and only need to put together. (Although the resulting model greatly benefits from those lasercutassembly parts) Scond type of kit iI would be seriously be tempted: navyboard style enlisch first or second rate. (Again 1:192, seriouslwood, historycally accurate, and all other remarks i madeabove) Jan
  17. yeah, toninght, in the evening, when it is too dark for garden work Jan
  18. When redesigning, are you also to get rid of some of the historical mistakes Mamoli had in some of its kits? (e.g. the famous Friesland-kit, although beautiful, had some serious issues.) Jan
×
×
  • Create New...