Hubac's Historian

I hear what you are saying about keeping some variety from one tier to the next, but in my opinion, this is largely accomplished by the varying ornament of the stern balcony railings. The mitered panel surrounds are a good argument for consistency on that particular detail. As for the stern paint scheme - like you, I have been mulling over the water colored draft of Berain’s stern, which appears to show a very faded red color for most of the stern, with ultra-marine accent on the tafferal. A while back, J.C. Lemineur suggested to me that it was more likely that all of SR’s upper bulwarks were painted something like Vasa red, rather than ultra-marine. Yet there are first-hand descriptions of the ship that confirm a black boot-top along the lower main wales, ventre-de-biche along the lower and middle batteries, and royal blue upper bulwarks. Personally, while I will incorporate two shades of blue into my upper bulwark broadsides, I am strongly considering the use of something vivid, like Vasa red, for the stern, which would also be accented with ultra-marine blue in a way that is consistent with my use of this color as an accent on my broadsides. In my vue, there is at least a contemporary document to suggest that this was possible/plausible, and I have yet to see the ship modeled in that color scheme, so I like the uniqueness of that presentation. The aspect of that presentation that I haven’t completely figured out yet, is where the middle-balcony wraps to the quarter gallery. On your model, EJ, the lower balcony also wraps to the quarters, so this suggests the need for using blue in the right spots to create a natural transition between the two colors.

EJ, the middle tier really looks fantastic. I really like your layered approach to adding in the details. In particular, Inlike the beveled moukdings that frame the lower panels of the middle tier. The mitered corners look really great and finished. All of this adds tremendously to the appearance of the stern and makes a great base for the ornamental accents tyat are soon to come. I wonder, though, whether you will re-work the upper tier to match this middle tier, or will those panels receive a different treatment?

You’re off to an excellent start, there, EJ! I love the shaping of the window top.

Planking coming along beautifully, Don. Having never done it before, it seems to me that getting around a curved transom, like that, is a little more tricky than it may appear. Is it necessary to back-bevel the top edges of the planks, in this area, to keep the seams tight?

A while back, Dan had brought to my attention the fact that the main deck ports, especially aft, run perpendicular with the sheer of the wales, but not plumb with the underlying framing, as they should be. Here is a shot of my first SR, to illustrate the point: The problem also exists in the bow, but oddly enough the middle and lower deck ports, in this forward part of the hull are also out of plumb. I suspect that to fix the main deck ports, in the fore channel area, would actually end up looking more wrong because of what is going on underneath it: So, with that in mind, I have decided to replace the port frames for the six gunports, aft of the waist ladder. Once again, Henry has come to the rescue! I am salvaging port frames from his spare upper bulwarks. The essential process is to rough-cut them out with a scroll saw, and then use the drum sander attachment, in the Dremel, to get pretty close to the port edges first, and then waste away the backside until I am within a light 1/32” of being left with the frame alone. Then I work the frames, back and forth on an 80-grit block until the background disappears. At the very outset, I had rubbed away most of the gold paint (very efficiently) with a maroon ScotchBright pad. With the frames extricated, I then used the tip of a #11 blade to scrape away most of the remaining paint from the frame edges and the delicate moulded crevices. This is, by far, the most hateful step in the process. That being said, I can do five frames in a night (a couple of hours) - start to finish. In all, I cleaned 14, just to have two extra to choose from. Here is an array of the process: I started with the port side; each time I introduce a modification, I try to alternate the side I start on so that one side of the ship does not end up looking significantly or at least perceptibly better than the other. My technique improves as I go What I spent the most time on, was getting the upper bulwark piece to sit snugly in it’s rabbet. That has to be where it’s going to go before setting the frames. The first time I built this model, I had to fill a significant gap all along the length of the upper bulwark. This time around, the fills will be minimal. Here are the port frames installed and as they appear next to the ports below: It is a very slight adjustment, and it may seem that relative to the window above it, that I didn’t tilt them quite plumb enough. I did, however, manipulate the first two before the glue set, and any further just didn’t look right with the other gunports. For comparison’s sake, here is the starboard side: I still have to fair the interior edges of the port frames with a file and putty. On the finished model, this will be a detail that you will never notice. But without it, astute eyes have noticed and will continue to do so.

Here’s a little photo essay of my most recent addition to the library. I was first made aware of this title, earlier in the year, when Dan Pariser showed it to me. When I first looked on Amazon, used copies were ranging anywhere from $150 - $500. I waited a while and found this copy for just less than $100. Aside from some light wear on the dust jacket, it is in near perfect condition. This book is teeming with high resolution prints of Van de Velde ship portraits that are so much clearer than most others I have seen. The focus is on the development of the British navy after the Restoration of Charles II. The book features many of the important, known first snd second rate ships, but also does a good job of illuminating the smaller third through fifth rate ships. This was the heyday of English baroque ornamentation and the design underpinnings of much of what would follow in English naval architecture, over the next 150 years. It is such a fantastic resource, which chronicles the modification history of a number of important ships. I can’t recommend it highly enough for gleaning the small details that make a good model great. Above, the Royal Prince of 1610, much altered after her mid-century re-fit The Prince of 1670, shown with an elaborate (perhaps painted) frieze all along her upper bulwarks The Sovereign of the Seas as she originally appeared in 1637, and then following a significant modernization. I prefer her re-fit appearance and believe there is enough portraiture of her, in this phase of life, to create a very good model of her. The old James, marvelous detail of the starboard bow. The Royal Charles, ex Nasbey Incredible stern detail of the Royal James The detail of the portraits above has an almost photographic realism to it. And one last Great Ship, but I could keep providing examples - one more amazing than the next. — In build news, I will soon have an update for SR. I’ve been busily extricating arched gun port frames from Henry’s spare upper bulwarks, so that I may plumb the aft run of these ports on my model. It has been a tedious process, but well worth the effort. I will photograph my first SR, and the straightened ports for the sake of comparison.

Hi EJ - this is the part of your build that I have been waiting for. Given your modifications, to date, I think it is absolutely necessary to take the extra time to create a custom window layout. Without the additional space for the sixth window, the only option is to reduce their width. I feel your pain, though, as on my own build I am still hoping to avoid having to create new window frames for my six-window layout. If you so choose to, a new layout will also afford you the opportunity to present the unique window shape of each tier, as they are each slightly different. The effort won’t be wasted here.

Thanks for the heads’up on the silk flags, Ken. It makes sense that silk would swag nicely like that. Ship’s boats are looking excellent!

I'm in, also, Don. This ship has nice lines, and after your last build, I expect that you will do great things with this one. Looking forward to enjoying the process.

Great tip on the spray starch, Ken. Looks fantastic. Can you tell me what the flags are made of? Cotton, linen?

Here is the Amstelant: And the Eendracht:

The great thing about Van de Velde, the Elder, is that he often does document the fastening of the wales, among other iron fastenings, on his early portraits from the 1650s/60s. There are several excellent portraits of post-battle, scarred Dutch ships laying in for repairs that give a fairly clear idea of the topography of a ship’s hull from this period. Later, I’ll upload a few images from my Pinterest page to show what I mean.

This is off to a great start, Chris. I can relate to trying to get a little quality working time in, around the sleeping times of my kids. I try to get at least a little something done, most evenings, but some nights I just don’t have it. Anyway, this is such a lovely frigate you are building, and I am looking forward to following along.

I’ve finished reconstructing the bow, with the stem pieces glued back in place. I’ve added in the through-bolts, the nail impressions and any other bits that had been broken off, in the process. The first batch of through-bolts I made was too small in diameter and noticeably didn’t match the others surrounding them. So, I scraped those away and replaced them. I found it was necessary to insert another shim under the port side, in order to bring the wales and plank lines up, and fully in alignment with the starboard side. After I had cut away the lower hull, I was using a long sanding block to true up the water line. I was not yet aware, however, how quickly un-even pressure can remove plastic in areas where you don’t want to; consequently, I oversanded the port bow by a full 1/16”. Nothing in life is perfect, but this added shim - together with judicious additions and subtractions to the wales - are a reasonable facsimile of symmetry. With a nod to Marc Yeu, aka NekO, I also filled between the lower main wales, as a forward continuation of the anchor lining. He was quite right to point this out, and I am happier now that I have included the detail. I was uncertain as to whether I should simply nail or through-bolt the length of this thicker planking, to match the wales it is sandwiched between. I decided upon nails, as I had the rest of the anchor lining - only through-bolting the edges of the lining. I don’t know whether this is actually correct, but this is an approach I have seen on a number of really excellent models. I like the way it looks, and couldn’t find any evidence (not just pictures, but written descriptions of known practice) in my “archives” to directly refute it, so I went with it. The added benefit of adding this strip is that it crosses and helps strengthen the extension joint. For the time being, I have not trued-up the mating faces of the stem. I will wait to do so until I am actually ready to assemble the hull halves onto their base plate. Not surprisingly, it was again necessary to apply direct heat from a tea light candle to the port stem piece, in order to bring it back in line with the modified run of the port hull extension pieces. The interior surface got a little melty, but a few applications of heat brought the two pieces into agreement. The outboard-most hawse hole was filled with styrene rod, faired and any remaining discrepancies were smoothed over with Squadron white. Drilling the new in-board hawse hole was done in stages with three bits, graduated in size. I was a little apprehensive about doing this because the 3/8”, on center, spacing lands the hawse hole directly on the bow extension joint. Further complicating matters is the fact that the holes aren’t drilled perpendicular to the outer surface of the hull, but at an oblique angle. My solution to this was to sloooowly start the hole - with a very light touch on the drill trigger - with a 1/16” bit. Once the bit was about a 1/16” into the plastic, I adjusted the angle of the bit and finished drilling through the hull. The rest was easy. I followed with a 6/64” bit, and finished the hole at 1/8”. Again, the symmetry from port to starboard isn’t absolutely perfect (port, inboard hole is a touch higher than starboard), but it is close enough that I can live with it. Although I will eventually be adding cheeks/bolsters to the lower half of the hawse holes, I did want to add back the moulded lip of the hawse hole. After scavenging around my apartment, I found some electronics wire-ties that were the perfect gauge for recreating this moulding. After stripping the plastic from the wire, I straightened the wire and then made three tight wraps around a 5/16” drill bit shank. I lucked out, in that the wire had surprisingly decent tensile strength for such light-gauge stuff, and it held a nice tight coil. Next, I used a single-edge carpet razor, and a light peening hammer to strike through the three loops of the coil, simultaneously, and at a slight angle to the cut. This resulted in at least two open rings that could be teased back, and closed into a nice circular shape. Before gluing them in place, I flattened the backs on the fine side of an emmory board, and was again surprised that the rings held their shape, despite the rough back and forth action. I am very pleased with the result, and only the top half of the rings will be visible above the bolsters, anyway. Here are a couple of shots showing the run of the bow, from overhead, as well as all of the interior bracing: And one final shot of the port side, showing the full aspect of all of these modifications to the lower hull: At the moment, I am debating whether to thin the bulwarks and scribe in plank lines, where the beakhead bulkhead joins the ship sides. The kit’s stock arrangement is to glue the bulkhead plate over the edges of the upper hull/bulwarks. This is not, however, what would have been done, in reality. This detail is more visible at the stern, which is why I did so there, but much less visible at the bow. As I’m re-building all of the decks from scratch, including this detail won’t affect anything important. I will probably go ahead and do this because it doesn’t take long, and not doing so will forever-after annoy me.

I’m glad to see you went this route, with the through bolts and carriage bolts, EJ. They are nice details that add so much to the finished model.

This should be a good one - I'm in!

It may very well make sense to do that, Dan, and I have an extra set of headrails (courtesy of Henry) with which to experiment. Splicing in short segments may also be a possibility. As for whether it makes sense to do any of that, I suppose it all depends upon how much stretch, or how long a splice is needed. Anyway, there is time yet to ponder that.

And here's the Van de Velde painting:

My hunch has to do with the way that Peter Monamy has represented the headrails in this painting: It's subtle, but I believe this shows a more arcing plane of the three headrails, as one is accustomed to seeing in English and Dutch practice. There is another painting of the Destruction of SR, attributed to the VDV studio, that shows only the bow of the ship. The composition is a cloud of smoke and turbulent flame, without much detail, but the headrails also appear sloped, in this work. As with so many things - I could be completely wrong, but it's worth investigating further.

I think that you are correct, Henry, and I've already half convinced myself to remake the headrails anyway. In part, because while Heller (and Tanneron) model the headrails as three rails in the same vertical plane, I believe that they should more correctly follow the downward arcing plane of the supporting knees. I haven't done any hard research on this. For now, it is just a hunch.

Thank you Jim, Dan and EJ, and everyone for the likes and looking in. Yes, EJ, it was a little touch and go for a while, there. But this is just one of several challenges that my approach to the model will present for me. One thing that will be interesting to see is whether widening the bow effectively shortens the head rails so that the scrolled volute - tucked just behind and above the wings of the figurehead angel - drop below the level of the sprit mast. In the stock arrangement, the scrolls flank the sprit mast and spoil the fairlead of the bowsprit running rigging. I may not be able to avoid re-making the headrails, though, because if they drop too far there will be no reasonable room for the knees that are supposed to support them. Custom headrails would incorporate a somewhat flatter arc, which would be more flattering, anyway. If I go this route, I could still recycle the ornamental aspects of the stock headrails, thus saving considerable time and effort. I thought that Michel Saunier created a very good shape for his headrails, and I would likely attempt something along those lines.

That is an excellent suggestion BW, and one that I considered. Unfortunately, though, it wouldn't have worked because of the curvature of the hull;. The aft end of the hawser insert would have stepped inboard from the outer plane of the hull, if that makes sense. But I liked the idea for exactly the reason you mentioned. Thank you, BW, for following along and weighing in.

I just wanted to post a few pics with the bow now in alignment. After plumbing the stem, it became apparent to me that the angle at which the stem pieces will rejoin the hull is too acute, causing the hull halves to pinch inboard, towards the centerline. I could have re-glued the stem pieces, as is, and there probably would have been enough flex to spread the stern to the necessary width, but this inevitably would have created distortions in the hull, along it's length. So, I corrected the angle at the stem, and now the bow closes neatly, while leaving the stern open at a workable width. I thought I had taken a pic of this, but alas, I did not. Lastly, here's a shot of the revised bow from straight away. You can see that I shimmed up the port side. I'll still need to do a little addition and subtraction of the wales to reconcile one side to the other. There is a crack of daylight at the joint, which disappears when placed on the kitchen countertop. A straightedge in two directions on both the countertop and table tell me that both surfaces are flat. Nonetheless, this discrepancy appears on the table. Go figure! However, because it closes neatly with light finger pressure, I have decided to leave well-enough alone, and not chase "perfection." I've re-enforced the back side of the joint. It occurs to me that the sliver of hawse hole that came in with the extension pieces is a good and reasonable re-location for the missing hawse hole. I'll simply fill in the outboard-most hole with styrene rod and putty. The rest is just putty, re-scribing lines and detailing.

This is really an incredible job you're doing, Ken. The rigging really looks great!

Well done, Dan! The fidelity from your model to the real thing is impeccable. It all looks just right.