Jump to content
NRG Photographic Model Ship Competition - All eligible to enter - Reduced memberhsip fee - JULY 31 ENTRY DEADLINE ×

Kevin-the-lubber

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,202

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Kevin-the-lubber

  1. Kevin-the-lubber
    Bob, I know exactly where you're coming from. I stopped enjoying my work on the Victory last year and parked it. I still haven't regained the motivation so it can stay parked until I do, or possibly forever. Good luck with what you do next, post a link, I'm sure I'm not alone in sometimes thinking it's be nice to build a car, a train or (in my case) a bike. Heck, it'd be nice just to not be fighting the thing most days!
  2. Kevin-the-lubber
    Fantastic achievement Bill, just fantastic. And not just finishing the model and to such a high standard, but between you and others, Ian in particular, maintaining a build log that I'm sure is going to be one of the key resources for many that follow, me included.
  3. Kevin-the-lubber
    Another follower here Bill, sorry I'm late, I got caught up on some chaps' finale on Victory 🙂. Wow, this kit looks far better than I was expecting, I wrongly had the impression that the mouldings were quite poor now, but they look at least as good, if not better than, Victory's. Didn't Daniel show how he made chains for Victory? Anyway, eagerly watching to see how it goes.
  4. Kevin-the-lubber
    That sounds unpleasant and probably a bit scary. I loathe cities, there always seems to be a fizz of danger about them and even though we are only 40 minutes from London I only go there maybe once a year. Anyway, good to see you getting back into the groove, I always enjoy looking at what you're up to. I'm no historian but, for what it's worth, until I read the narrative I assumed the drawings were of french ships since that's what they look like. Case proven, methinks. Otherwise, you're probably right, I should hang onto my machines. And my telescopes, despite the lousy eyesight for astronomy and no longer liking being awake at 3am on a freezing night. Maybe I'll get cataracts, have them done and suddenly see a whole new Saturn or Jupiter 🙂.
  5. Kevin-the-lubber
    The boats are finished now, along with new skids to accommodate the jolly boat being in the middle. I'm still fiddling with skids on the fore cabin roof as the kit parts are all wrong for a gig. In other news, I've been working on the foremast and spars, coupled with the deadeyes as these are all part of a piece, over the last month while waiting for boats to print, paint to dry, summer to return etc. It's another good exercise; I'm already beginning to learn the names of rigging parts and understand how some things relate to others. It may be a while until I'm ready to post on that though and I'm reconciled to this project running well into next year. I still have no idea how I'm going to make sails though!
  6. Kevin-the-lubber
    Credit where it's due, I think those were the hands of the original builders as all I've done is copy from the plans, with some important help from your good self. But it's surprising how chubby and crude the kit part looks against the 'plans' version, isn't it. This is the pick of the litter for me though, the gig, which has the most beautiful lines. I may make this one a little side project and do it separately at about 1/30 or 1/40. It would make a very nice windowsill ornament with all the trimmings. I'm hoping to find time to pop up to Greenwich next week for another photo session and this would be on the 'to-do' list.
  7. Kevin-the-lubber
    And..... breathe top = kit; bottom = mine left = kit; right = mine
  8. Kevin-the-lubber
    I think we're using quite similar methods, tailored to our respective CAD packages. As mentioned, I also corrected the two ends manually. I didn't find this too time-consuming in F360, I think it was mostly a case of projecting the guide rails onto a flat sketch, then correcting the two ends, plotting their positions on the end profiles, then remaking the guide rails to incorporate the ends. This is what I did at the ends, compared to the centre profiles: I used exactly the same overlapping approach as for the centres, but without the clinker offset. I didn't shape the frames to the strakes, the strakes just sit on the frames. I don't know if this is how it is in real life? At this scale (1:100) you wouldnt be able to see the notching anyway.
  9. Kevin-the-lubber
    ps. sorry, I meant to ask - what's wrong with your planks, they look pretty good from here? In fact your model looks way better than mine, you've already sorted out the tricky sections at the ends. Whatever you're doing, I'd carry on with that.
  10. Kevin-the-lubber
    I fudged it in the end. I really wanted something that was mathematically driven - I'm sure you know what I mean - but I couldn't figure out a methodology for the end profiles. I basically did what you see below; I got a smooth skin by lofting a whole-mould-based set of profiles (the green lines here) which I used to fair the shape. In faact I had very little fairing to do as (I think) whole-moulding generates smooth curves. I then drew strake profiles in a clinker pattern, evenly spaced in the station profile, and lofting rails for each strake, otherwise it all goes a bit mis-shapen; and lofted each strake individually. I had to abandon the maths at either end as the end profiles are perpendicular and don't lend themselves to mathematical segmentation, so I projected the rail lines and extended them to get the placings for the strakes and tweaked by eye until they looked right. (It gets more and more like real shipbuilding as you go along!). I tried to make a single clinkered station profile i.e. to loft all 10 strakes simultaneously, but got nowhere, I think this geometry was way too complex for F360's engine. Last but not least, and I'm guessing you've done something similar, I did another shell (one of the inner smooth lines on each profile), thickened, then split it (intersected actually, in F360 speak) to get the frames.
  11. Kevin-the-lubber
    Tabycz, are you interested in talking geeky methodology? I know this can be very boring for some 🙂. I've just finished modelling a clinker built boat in F360 and had to jump through hoops to loft the planks, would be interesting to compare notes as I doubt my way was the best. Waldemar, that's the lifeboat you helped me with, couple of quick snaps below, whole moulding was perfect. I'm in the middle of painting them so the seats are not yet glued in but (IMO) these little boats look gorgeous once they're all painted up. I'll do a proper log entry when it's finished but I've posted photos of the gig and jolly boat on my cutty sark log.
  12. Kevin-the-lubber
    Very well done Bill, you’ve got that done far more quickly than I expected. Everyone talks of it taking years! Boats…. they’re my current preoccupation too.
  13. Kevin-the-lubber
    Bill, I just did a good catch up on your build, it’s looking fabulous with all that rigging. You must be quite close to finishing now?
  14. Kevin-the-lubber
    I've spent far more time on these boats than I should, but it's been interesting and enjoyable. I'm still working on the lifeboat but here are the jolly and gig (which is omitted from the kit). For info, I had to fiddle with the thicknesses of several areas including the hull because scaling down to 1/96 resulted in paper thin parts, but I think the end result is a pretty fair representation. Revell's jolly boat. Not too bad, a bit crude and clunky though. The real jolly boat The model. The paintwork is much darker in the flesh, similar to the real thing; I over-exposed the photo just to show the detail a little more clearly. I omitted the little circular badges on the prow, too small for painting. The sleek gig; if I was a sailor this is what I'd want to drive 🙂
  15. Kevin-the-lubber
    Ian, I tried using handheld scanning with a phone to map Hellers victory quarter galleries last year, but for reasons I forget I gave up on it. I think I was only able to get the rough shape but I’d need something better for the level of detail I was seeking. I imagine a proper 3D scanning setup might be better, but that’s way too expensive for this hobbyist. Modelling the boats has been an education in this respect. I was gifted a full size, finished 3D model of the jolly boat, but making that fit for my purposes meant recreating it entirely in Fusion 360. Essentially, I could only use it ‘as is’ or as an excellent reference. I think photogrammetry may be similar, for modelling: an approximation, but you’ll have to do so much post-scan work that you may as well do it by measurement, if that’s possible. But I’m all ears if anyone has had more success with it.
  16. Kevin-the-lubber
    Thanks Bob, I saw your Robert E Lee on your CS log, looks lovely and that’s fast work! I’ll have to take a look at the build log. I hope you’re making a good recovery - spinal surgery is serious stuff. I’m having an ankle fused in two or three months time, and even that makes me nervous. On the bright side I should have some recovery time to spend on models! I’m just finishing off the replacement boats and will post some photos soon. It’s been a lot of work, most of which won’t even be seen since they’ll be upside down, but I wanted to understand how to model these in the software and to have ‘stock’ clinker built boats that I can recycle on other models. I’ve started modelling the masts and yards so I’ll be behind you on rigging as modelling anything from scratch always takes a lot of time. In fact I’ve started modelling the hull, which would mean nothing on the ship would be revell, but as that will be a project in itself I’ll do that as a separate build down the line, possibly at about 1/75 or even 1/50.
  17. Kevin-the-lubber
    My view is this: whatever looks most right and gets you closest to what you want with the least amount of work. In other words, the line of least resistance. I don't know about you but I find fairing on a computer to be much more difficult than if I was doing it to a piece of timber. No options here to run your hand along it with your eyes closed, feel the little bumps.
  18. Kevin-the-lubber
    I don’t know if this will be at all helpful as I sense you really do want a true scarf joint; but me, I would fake it, and engrave the lines into the wood. (Actually, since I 3D print everything, I would just design them in). I don’t know how rhino works but in f360, if I wanted a true scarf, I would loft one part from top to bottom using guide rails, then cut the matching half with the lofted one and probably offset the face of one of them by a little for a bit of clearance.
  19. Kevin-the-lubber
    Easily done, isn’t it, I glued the catheads on wronghanded last week. Bill, the ink I’ve mostly used is Windsor & Newton Peat Brown, but that was because I particularly wanted a reddish hue to mimic varnished teak. I also have a pot of W&N nut brown which is similar, I suspect, to walnut. The only reason I bought W&N is because that’s what’s in my local art store 300 yards away, and I like to support local shops wherever possible instead of adding to Jeff’s obscene levels of wealth. (Why would anyone want so much money - as my gran used to say, there are no pockets in a shroud). And I’m in a similar place to many of you when it comes to doing jobs around the house. I find myself looking at all my machinery - the planer/thicknesses, the saws, bench drill, biscuit joiner etc etc and thinking, shall I sell them now, am I really going to do the remaining jobs if I retire next year. You lose the enthusiasm once there’s more pain than gain 🤕
  20. Kevin-the-lubber
    Thanks Bruma, I know that is all very good advice. I'm a lot more gentle on myself now than I was a year ago, with the Victory; if I don't feel like doing something, or want to work on another area of the ship, I just do. And I know what you mean about there being no irrelevant parts, these ships were masterpieces of design and everything is there for a reason.
  21. Kevin-the-lubber
    You could always do what I did, and take up 3D printing. It doesn’t have the same satisfaction as making something by hand but, if like me you can’t do that anyway, you still have the design challenges.
  22. Kevin-the-lubber
    I will indeed. Don't hold your breath, these boats are fiddly to do and it might take me a while to get to the end point (though I hope not too long)
  23. Kevin-the-lubber
    Perfect, many many thanks Waldemar. I'll need to spend an hour or two properly digesting and playing around with this at the weekend and then compare the outcome with the quick'n'dirty version below, done as outlined in post #7.
  24. Kevin-the-lubber
    Hi Kris Well, F360 is free for hobbyists. It has it's foibles and can be frustratingly clunky at times but I've managed to find ways to do everything I've wanted so far, including clinker hulls (screengrab below), despite on many occasions saying I was going to properly try Rhino with a view to switching. Declaration of self-interest here, I'd love someone who has used both tools to give an objective appraisal so I know if Rhino is worth the learning curve and cost! (These boats are a work in progress but they print fine) I don't know if it can import rhino files but it can certainly import .fbx files. Though working with these is a bit of a PITA as they come through as meshes. I suspect you really won't need this but I found this F360 tutorial very helpful to get going quickly https://diyodemag.com/education/exploring_3d_part_1_beginners_guide_to_fusion_360 Good luck, it would be good to hear what you land on, what it's like etc. I've just had a pretty quick skim through your build log and FYI, I've initially lofted each strake separately as F360 can give you the runaround with lofting if the profiles are too complex (relatively speaking) but I'm no expert on this. Just noted that you look like you've lofted as whole station profiles on yours. I'll try to find the time to read your log properly over the next week as you seem to have run into problems with Rhino but here's a link to a man who can almost certainly help you there
  25. Kevin-the-lubber
    Waldemar, many thanks, that's exactly what I'm looking for, the logical projection method. I have forgotten so much over the years. Have you used a constant radius based on the '0' station? From a pattern developers perspective I think that is all that's needed to get a fair shape from these three views.

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)

Helpful Links

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.

The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.

Our Emblem ®

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

Nautical Research Guild ® and the NRG logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,999,236 & No. 6,999,237, registered March 14, 2023)

×
×
  • Create New...