-
Posts
4,000 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by glbarlow
-
Focus Stacking
glbarlow replied to Dennis P Finegan's topic in Photographing your work. How to do this.
Nikon pro level cameras have a much simpler focus stacking feature, a few settings from a fixed camera position and the camera does all the work with one click of the shutter. Of course the resulting images still have to be combined in post. -
Just curious as to why? The two fore riding bits are so much larger and more ‘beefy’ than the main mast bits on Winchelsea. Were they used differently or have a different purpose? Just curious.
- 1,784 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Those are tricky angles for sure
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Glad it helped Frank. Your English is more than fine. Let me know if I can help further I am scupper free so can’t help there.
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks, I think 😊 that’s not a connection I’d make.
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sorry Frank, I don’t understand the question. Are you referring to the deck clamps and the notches that hold the beams? If so that was an important step as I mounted the clamps. I prepared a couple of the beams, mounted the deck clamp on one side per the plans and instructions then used a mini-square and lots of measuring with the test beams to set the other side so the beams both perpendicular and the same height at both bulwarks (so parallel) to the deck. Most notches had to be widened, I only did that from the bow side so the stern side of the notch never changed. I also checked each beam against the plans templates for distance between beams and again checked heights as I went. As noted in the post adjustments were later required at the bow, still need a good starting point though. If that’s not what you were asking, please let me know.
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks JJ. I think about it every time I’m putting the third coat of red on a knee 🤣
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for the comment. I ran every plank I used on the hull and deck through it to ensure a consistent thickness an a number of other times as well. It’s the tool I never knew I needed until I got one and not sure how I did without it now that I have it.
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Starting the Forecastle Moving on to the bow, it having looked so empty after finishing the first phase of the quarterdeck. I had fit the forecastle beams a while back so that meant re-fitting to match the template. In my case that meant the most forward six had to all be moved forward by varying amounts and the deck clamps modified accordingly. Chuck points out this was a known challenge going into the planning given the two vs. three dimensional view and variance amongst as-built hulls. I picked up using these surgeon quality chisels from @Blue Ensign a while back. The two sizes, the larger one shown here, are very sharp. The only version I could find were sterile (consequently more expensive) but they are more than worth the price for jobs like widening the deck clamp slots. Plus I don’t have to worry about my wood getting an infection. I elected to install the forward most beam once I had the proper distance from beam 7, 8, and 9 (triple confirmation) as those three along with 10 matched the template. That gave me measurements in two directions for moving the remaining 2-6 beams, double and triple confirmation. I got ahead of myself by not taking photos, and the ones I did take are off-angle. The bowsprit step, composed of four bits of boxwood laser cut was up next followed by the manger boards composed of 6 pieces (times two) including a strips of 1/64 x 1/8 planed to that thickness by my Byrnes thickness sander, 1/64 is about as thin as it goes, but it did it. Interestingly, but obvious when you think about it, the bowsprit step has a slight rearward lean to it, something to remember when setting the fully upright manager boards. Not shown, but as per the instructions, I also made the bits to match the step which will be added on top later (as Chuck points out in reality it would be all one piece but we won’t know the difference once added). The manger boards have to be shaped to fit the angle of the bowsprit step and also slightly more challenging, the bulwarks. They must fit and not block the knee for beam 3, so to keep that from happening I first permanently installed beams 2 and 3 and then the hanging knees for beam 3. Again my photos taking lagged building, the lodging knees were added after all this followed by beam 4 and its hanging knees. Finally, once all the lodging knees were in place the cat tails were added. It was tricky placing and fitting them. A provided handy template marked the bulwark side. Here again, while in reality one piece the catheads will be added later. I found this interesting, no other model I’ve built shows this detail. NOTE: I realized I’d missed-marked the starboard side, fortunately before gluing the cattail. It was erased and marked correctly. I used the bowsprit step as a reference point for the inward edges first by laying them on top and adding pencil marks as the guide suggested by the instructions, then the fun task of gluing, placing and clamping to bottom of the beams while aligning with my little finger and flat headed tweezers. I also added the foremost carlings only because I wanted to see how it looked. And this is how it all looks completed. I sometimes wonder if I really want to cover almost all of this work up with deck planking later, a decision I will defer to much later. The key for me is to work slowly front to back and not install anything until I ensure it won’t make installing the next thing more difficult. In short read and plan ahead. On to the rest of Chapter 8 and the remainder of the forecastle structure. As always, thank you for your likes and comments. They are encouraging and appreciated.
- 840 replies
-
- winchelsea
- Syren Ship Model Company
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I actually found the old cast metal cannons the cheapest part of older kits, they never looked at all good. The new technology “plastic” ones finish so much better primed, painted with acrylic, and weathered, and much more realistic fitted out properly. As you said, can’t please everyone, especially the uniformed.
-
Looks good, seems like excellent work on the fairing. One suggestion if you haven’t already done it. Make a copy and cut out the transom diagram and check your fairing, especially the lower counter where the curve meets the wales. It doesn’t have to be exact but it should be close, almost a reverse C.
-
Your painting skills are exceptional, it brings such character to the model.
- 560 replies
-
- vanguard models
- alert
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I completely understand, makes me even more grateful for the beautiful boxwood carvings available separately for Winchelsea. Your solution is perfectly grand. My statement regarding James OOB build was not a reflection on your skills, more one wondering what Chris had in mind. You always bring something extra to the table. The session clips are on my order list, so many times these would work where I had to resolve to a finger clamp (and the resulting cramp).
- 648 replies
-
- Indefatigable
- Vanguard Models
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I’m still a year or two from completing Winchelsea, the design and quality of parts are second to none. I don’t think I’d be a buyer of the POF model. Not because of price, the work required for framing isn’t something that appeals to me. Not that I don’t fully admire the work of those that do. I will however be very interested in a fully rigged POB model. Is there a chance it might be 1:48, I’m running out of prime display space for very large models, or at least my wife says I am.
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.