Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    13,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Too true. I'm actually writing a novel on time travel using a steam powered machine. Definitely dangerous! On a more serious note, the 'blank' panel of the lower gallery is logical, as it balances another blank one on the foremost panel.
  2. Not looking after this now could develop into a 'knock on' one of cumulative error. I've had that happen, which is most annoying!
  3. Just catching up with your progress now, Kevin. Coming along! The bitts are vertical to the keel rather than the deck sheer, I believe. (I don't have the plan with me right now.)
  4. First consideration: how big is the space? That will often dictate what is practical and what is not.
  5. Very nicely rendered, Mathias. Never make a thing simple if you can make it complicated!
  6. This may sound bizarre, but in the first photo it appears that the seat and wheel, as well as the foil/rudder, is rotated. Was steering literally by the 'seat of the pants'?
  7. Like many of us, you wish for a 'way-back' machine to see how it actually was. All we can do is make an educated guess.
  8. This order makes perfect sense as the false keel is sacrificial. Thank you for this, Bruce.
  9. Nice attention to detail! Chart cabinet looks very convincing.
  10. Very nicely reworked. Having only the stern of the model is very convenient for tipping it up on end to work on! Papierverschwunden!
  11. First, it is considered standing rigging and therefore was tarred to preserve it. Secondly, sailors got this on them when they climbed the rigging, hence the traditional name 'tars'. I'm sure Trevor could confirm that!
  12. I wonder what the jaw capacity is?
  13. I think cut and move the third timberhead from aft is the reasonable. The fourth might be omitted altogether and the fifth moved aft.
  14. Allan: the position would need to be clear of the shrouds, i.e. near the green arrow. The captain would be most displeased with self-destruction. So, either a timberhead was removed or re-spaced. Another clue as to position would be where the deck beams beneath are placed.
  15. The amazing floating beams! That is a neat solution for positioning them.
  16. No, I don't think so, Allan. It would blow the timberheads apart there. The carronade must have replaced a 9-pounder at one of the red locations, or mods. made to the forecastle to accommodate it.
  17. Well, now I'm also confused! I was only referring to the color arrowed plan (post #38), with two wider spaces between timberheads and gaps in the rail. I think we can safely assume a drafting error with the single line through this gap on the aft space.
  18. Just carronades at the red arrows only. It could be only a single carronade with two possible positions for it!
  19. Full marks for perseverance and creative solutions. Not, perhaps, for stabbing yourself! Please always keep your fingers behind a cutting edge or point!
×
×
  • Create New...