Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    12,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Why not Jupiter on both the stem and the stern? Generally, only one is in view at any one time. Also, not everyone was literate!
  2. Ah! So, 'triste' in context means 'serious', not 'sad'! Thank you.
  3. The photos are from the prototype, which was later modified. All should be OK! (I think that you are the first person to notice this.)
  4. My own method for dealing with ratlines so that shrouds do not 'hourglass' is to tie every fifth ratline first, then every third one and finally all the remaining ones. By not progressively working every one up in sequence, this has always worked well for me.
  5. I wonder why Jupiter's figure was described as having un visage triste (a sad face)? Jupiter was god of thunder and lightning - very appropriate for a warship. Also, the mythical salamander was reputed to breathe fire (think dragon). All very martial!
  6. Oh, yes, indeed. Things can sure come back to bite one later if one is not very careful!
  7. Apart from the slight splintering, that fixed block looks pretty good, Alan. What wood are you using for these?
  8. Beams located less than 0.5mm too high? I'm disappointed in you, Mark! Seriously, that is pretty impressive.
  9. Again, congratulations for putting the more unusual in front of your public, Chris. It's amazing the variety of smaller vessels that plans are available for from that period.
  10. There is little available on carronades mounted on the 'outboard principle'. Some years ago I researched these mounts from the early 1780's. Contemporary illustrations are reproduced in Caruana's The History of English Sea Ordnance 1523-1875, Volume II, pages 195 et seq. (The actual model's carronades were cast in pewter.)
  11. I believe from previous comments on MSW that this device is a snare and a delusion! One needs to rig shrouds the conventional way - on the model itself.
  12. Some thought on your dilemma: One, is that really lime wood? The appearance is very different to lime I've used in the past, where the grain is almost invisible. Two, your workmanship is fine - that is not the issue. Three, I note that the grain on some of your futtocks does not run at a tangent to the piece (e.g. photo below 'glue in with titebond'). Avoid cross-grain as much as possible. Four, fit temporary cross-spalls across the toptimbers to maintain designed width. This was done on full sized frames.
  13. Has the wire been annealed (softened) by heating to red heat and allowed to cool? It won't 'mushroom' if still hard.
  14. Clare: The reason for my identifying the model easily is that, for the past four years, I've been studying Stuart Royal yachts very closely. I've seen examples or photos of every contemporary model still extant, plus many paintings and drawings of these. In fact, there is now a study model of the original 1683 Fubbs (not the 1724 rebuild!) and a SeaWatch book on her will be published in due course (shameless promotion). In addition, a fellow researcher in England and I are working on a book that covers all 25 Stuart Royal yachts in detail. Now, aren't you sorry that you asked!
×
×
  • Create New...