Jump to content
Supplies of the Ship Modeler's Handbook are running out. Get your copy NOW before they are gone! Click on photo to order. ×

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    13,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Chris: it's very similar to Endeavour. However, I'm sure every shipyard had slightly different methods of planking. I'm also sure that no more stealers or drop planks were arranged than were absolutely necessary, saving much work.
  2. You see this technique on 18th century museum models such as seen in Annapolis or (formerly) Greenwich, Mark.
  3. Here is a photo of that bluff bow completely planked. Two hooked strakes under the main wale was all that was needed!
  4. The example you cite, Captain Jerry, is a rather excessive one. It is the result of allowing the garboard strake run too high up the stem, forcing the other strakes to be too crowded into the stem. This could easily have been avoided by an experienced shipwright. Take a look at the example in 'A primer on planking' by David Antscherl pinned on this site. The bow is just as bluff as the one in your photo, but compare the run of planking in both examples.
  5. Very, very nice so far, Karl!
  6. I agree: Taking time to plan and draw the planking layout and shift of butts is never a waste of time! It will save grief later on.
  7. If that is where those timberheads are located, the way you have done it is very convincing. Well done!
  8. An additional hint: once I have a strake of planking laid, I run a sanding stick along the edge of it to ensure it is even and lines up with my mark-out before proceeding with the next strake.
  9. You forgot, Dan? Forgot???? And after all your work to make the lantern.... That's funny. Glad it all worked out for you, though.
  10. And take a lot less time, Dan!
  11. Coming along nicely, Mark. Try to resist doing too much sanding until planking is complete. What do you mean by '3" off'? Do you mean creep or cumulative error compared to your lining off of the planking runs? You can easily correct this by either making remaining strakes fractionally wider or narrower to compensate. Just don't let this become a big issue when it comes down to the last strake!
  12. All the best with the move, Ben. We will await your return with bated breath....
  13. You forgot, Gaetan? Please remember next time!
  14. I think elevating screws were coming in around that time, but one supposes older models of carronade were probably still in use. An exception was a 68lb carronade from New York of 1782 which is illustrated with a screw elevating device (Caruana)
  15. TFFM refers to trunnions on long guns, not carronades.
  16. Technique is great, Popeye, but I'd be wary of using ferrous metal in a model. It can rust under certain conditions. Brass or copper are better choices.
  17. Christian: The old-timers used both methods to get the timberheads in the positions that they needed them. As master shipwright, you need to make those decisions based on what makes the most practical sense.
  18. Check out Scale Hardware as Mark suggests.
  19. Only early carronades (1780-c.1795) had trunnions. Later models had 'joints' or lugs underneath. There were many changes in their design over the first 20 or so years. The elevating screw was a later development. You should be safe using a quoin.
  20. Very nicely done, Nils. However, I find the rivet heads 'read' a bit too prominently. Perhaps it's the fact that they are reflective at the moment?
  21. Just found this log. Lovely work so far, Mark.
×
×
  • Create New...