Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    12,673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. Now, those are crowsfeet! Well done. At the risk of being a pain, can you shape them mouses a little more mouse-like? (Hint: stays go over the shrouds. See photo.)
  2. You have the right idea. The lower deadeyes still have their laniards in place in your last photo. The upper deadeyes were attached as you see them, with a metal sheerpole lashed just above to keep the upper deadeyes from twisting around. The longer stropped lower deadeye must be for something else; perhaps a topmast stay? The shroud pair was looped over the mast head and this appears to have the lashing below the loop still in place. There are remains of the ratlines still there, so that will act as a pattern for spacing the replacements. I imagine the rigging is now brittle so should all be replaced. An interesting project!
  3. This from BBC: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220426-battle-of-the-aegates-the-shipwrecks-rewriting-roman-history It's quite a story of the discovery of the site of this battle and recovered artifacts.
  4. Lovely. Good luck with the cathead supporters. Those are the hardest pieces in the ship to make!
  5. Looks a bit like convolvulus. However, a botanical expert may know better!
  6. The issue with square-hole drawplates is that they are designed for pulling metal wire through. It essentially squeezes metal; it doesn't cut. Wood needs to be cut or shaved; it really doesn't squeeze well! That is why a drawplate for wood, such as the Byrnes' is of a different form than a traditional jewelers' drawplate. I don't know of such a square drawplate design on the market.
  7. Looks much more convincing, Meriadoc. However, I really wonder if a topgallant yard and sail was fitted. Perhaps just a less tapered, squarer topsail?
  8. Um, if you case your finished model (which you should) dust will not be a problem! Besides, dusting models can damage them all too easily.
  9. And yes, that it the right way to go about it. Use the thinnest line you can: I've used fine fly-tying brown line 6/0. usually crowsfeet look too clumsy on models.
  10. Congratulations Toni! A very nice result. Of courser the question is, what next?
  11. Might the downward arm of the bracket be angled even a little more to echo the converging lines of the row of lights or is it just the angle of the photo that makes it appear to slope less? Looking great!
  12. Well, Peregrinator, you really are back now! Why would you need to stain or varnish the deck? The way it appears now looks fine. That might solve that question!
  13. This close-up of the painting seems to show that it was 'skinned', that is to say, over-zealously cleaned at some point. Much fine detail has gone. Notice the spotty appearance of the dark paint, where the white ground is showing through and near-absence of some lines. A pity.
  14. Good progress, Meriadoc. Your mast and sail plan look rather too tall for a vessel of that size. I'm guessing that it should shrink by 15% or a little more.
  15. Just remember that ports, unless located at midships, are not square! The WMISIYCMIC principle: (Why make it simple if you can make it complicated.)
  16. Congratulations, Tomek. An excellent result and lovely model. I hope things remain peaceful in your neighborhood.
  17. Peregrinator indeed with all those moves! Welcome back. Yes, a few changes since the Great Crash, including a few members who have gone now to meet Davy Jones,. However, this is still a lively place to visit.
×
×
  • Create New...