Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 hours ago, Keith Black said:

  Mom liked you best.

Keith, as you may recall, I arrived 11 months after our older sister; therefore, she thought of me as a "mistake", and actually liked you better, having arrived at a more convenient time!

On the Sophie, putting the glass in first is proving to be much easier than my first, second, and third attempt!

Tom

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Pear put on. this perspective shows my attempt to follow the arc:

1767283450_sternwindows3.JPG.46ac2d40cc82db64d80df673769bd368.JPG

The molding along the bottom, below the windows, is 2 mm wide. I don't have small enough tools to give it some character, so it gets to be a 1/2 round. There is molding around the sides and upper edge that will be wider and maybe a chance to do something more interesting.

Posted
20 minutes ago, TBlack said:

I suppose one day I should get organized!

 Organization is the tool of the Devil. I got organized once and couldn't find anything till I got disorganized again. 

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

Somethings are better organized and others not so much. Small bits and pieces, yes. large stuff, no. Someone once re-organized my desk at work a nice gesture, but I couldn't find things in my paperwork pile, it was however nice to find some pens I had been looking for. 🙃

Current Build: Fair American - Model Shipways

Awaiting Parts - Rattlesnake

On the Shelf - English Pinnace

                        18Th Century Longboat

 

I stand firmly against piracy!

Posted

A clean desk is a sign of a sick mind. 

Steve

 

"If they suspect me of intelligence, I am sure it will soon blow over, ha, ha, ha!"

-- Jack Aubrey

 

Builds:

Yankee Hero, Fannie Gorham, We’re Here, Dapper Tom (x3), New Bedford Whaler, US Brig Lawrence (Niagara), Wyoming (half hull), Fra Berlanga (half hull), Gokstad Viking Ship, Kate Cory, Charles Morgan, Gjoa

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

OK, so I found the molding material. Did my best on the tricky corners and added the top rail:

1410635203_transomcomplete.JPG.b8988e27a0a7fbd749abbd3885ec74d4.JPG

Now the tricky parts are the stern davits:

picture.jpg.800b0eb6b003e6a1eafe7bee1b133ea6.jpg

My understanding is that, normally, these run along the top rail for support. But these don't. They just stick out from the transom. I think I'm going to depart from the photo and put them on the top rail unless you guys think otherwise.

Posted

Tom, the transom looks nice, the molding turned out great. I agree, putting the stern davits on the top rail would look better. 

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

OK, Keith, we agree on the davits, but I’ve made two mistakes. If you look where I’ve placed that top rail over the stern, you’ll see that the davits have to go right where the rail meets the transom. Gotta make that rail shorter. The other mistake you can’t see from the picture of the painting of the ship’s stern, but the painting on the cover of the book shows two gun ports in the transom. Guess I’m not done yet!

Tom

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 Tom, it looks great, are you pleased with the way Sophie is progressing?  

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

Keith, yes, she’s coming along OK now. I keep thinking I’m at the point when I can start following the kit instructions, but then remember some other detail. If you go back and look at the book cover photo in post 128, you’ll see that the hull planking is different than the kit which is straight pear. Also, the spacing between the tops of the gun ports and the top rail is smaller in the kit than in the photo. So, I’ll have to make some adjustments.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

A little more progress. I've gotten the rest of the siding on both port and starboard plus molding strip along the top:

816361122_1-1923stbdside.JPG.149ae3fc976326a074a3cb37110147d1.JPG

As I mentioned in my previous comment, the gun ports on the kit are higher than the painting. Also, you'll note that I finally attached the keel. She sits in the cradle much better now.

Tom

Edited by TBlack
Posted

 Tom, she's looking fantastic. Well done!

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

Thanks, Keith, bro, and all you others who are taking your precious time to follow my modest attempts. I do think that I've figured out how to accommodate an aft cabin and quarterdeck without altering the brig's lines too much. There are still a couple of issues that I need to sort out. Not the least of these is here:

stem.jpg.ea1eedb1ff4e6f267febd9151d2c108c.jpg

The joint with the stem is disturbing, and I can't get it any closer than what you see. The waterline will come just at the notch, so not to worry below that. Above I'll have to fill with pear paste. And then not look too closely!

Posted

 Ahh Tom, you'll be able to fill that and it won't even be noticeable. Press on Captain Black, you're doing a marvelous job. 

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

 I don't understand why red was used on the bulkheads, I know it was but white makes more sense (IMHO) with it's ability to reflect light.

 

 Great progress Tom.

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, TBlack said:

So now I'm rethinking the red. Perhaps a little too bright. It's splotchy and needs a second coat anyway, so maybe tone it down a little. If I were Chuck P., I'd know just the right mix of paint to make it happen, but I'm not so stay tuned!

1448920593_portqtr1-24-23.jpg.69cce73048567067370ce0e0d30b5307.jpg

Tom

If Patrick O'Brian doesn't mention the colour, I'd suggest that you can't go wrong with red ochre.  It was a very common colour for the inside bulwarks of Englich ships, and for a model, looks much better than a brighter red, in my view anyway.

 

Nipper

Current build:  HMS Sphinx 1775 - 1/64 - Vanguard Models

Completed build:  HM Cutter Alert 1777 - 1/64 - Vanguard Models

Posted (edited)

Hi Tom

 

Many modellers unfortunately use too bright colours. Using them straight out of the bottle or can lessens the look of their model. I highly recommend to dull all so called 'original' paints. Allow me to repeat something I wrote in my Bellerophon log some time ago:

 

(In a book, written by a professional model railroad landscape builder he explains about colour scale. By that he means that if you look at a model in scale 1/100 from a distance of 50cm it should look the same as the prototype from a distance of 50m. And from that distance colours look less bright because of the air absorbing some of the intensity. He says that's the reason that models tend to look like toys if you use original colours. He recommends to always mix in a bit of white or grey and to avoid shiny colours. I think it works.)

 

Usually I mix about 15 % dull white into any color I use, including black.

 

Regards

Peter

Edited by flyer
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Keith Black said:

I don't understand why red was used on the bulkheads,

These were war ships, lots of blood flying about during a battle, white would be demoralizing splattered with blood. Hence red being the standard.  I used Admiralty Paints Red Ochre on all my earlier models. Now, like Chuck P, I like RED. It makes the model pop, and highlights the details. Nothing at all wrong with the red you have, some modelers seem to think darker is better, not so in my view.

Edited by glbarlow

Regards,

Glenn

 

Current Build: Don't know yet.
Completed Builds: HMS Winchelsea HM Flirt (paused) HM Cutter CheerfulLady NelsonAmati HMS Vanguard,  
HMS Pegasus, Fair American, HM Granado, HM Pickle, AVS, Pride of Baltimore, Bluenose

Posted

My understanding is that red paint was just one of the cheaper ones to produce. Iron oxide is not hard to come by. This is the same reason why barns and other structures were commonly painted red for so long. You're going to have to repaint bulwarks exposed the elements fairly often, so you're not going to get fancy. 

Current build: HMS Speedy, Vanguard Models 1:64

 

Past Projects: 18th Century Longboat, Model Shipways, 1:48

                         22 Foot Yawl, Vanguard Models, 1:64

Posted

Further to Flyer’s comment on color scale:

 

Justin Camarata addresses this in his book, Waterline Dioramas
He references a chart created by Monogram Models that indicates the % white to be added to any color, including black, to get  “ scaled color”. He also references an article by Eric Ronnberg in a past NRG Journal that addresses this (perhaps another NRG member can comment on that article … I’ve not seen it). Here’s a pic of the page from Camarata’s book:

FC5D8908-5D9C-486E-8140-C76E20885CA8.thumb.jpeg.f95a4539bcefdc3f31057da5497c1048.jpeg

Steve

 

"If they suspect me of intelligence, I am sure it will soon blow over, ha, ha, ha!"

-- Jack Aubrey

 

Builds:

Yankee Hero, Fannie Gorham, We’re Here, Dapper Tom (x3), New Bedford Whaler, US Brig Lawrence (Niagara), Wyoming (half hull), Fra Berlanga (half hull), Gokstad Viking Ship, Kate Cory, Charles Morgan, Gjoa

Posted

If it looks right to you, then it’s right. 

One could easily argue ( if needed) that your choice actually is the scaled color, that the “ real” color is much darker than your choice, since lighter-darker are relative terms, and there is probably no baseline to measure against. Not sure how anyone could be definitive with a ship of fiction. 


Looks great to me. 

Steve

 

"If they suspect me of intelligence, I am sure it will soon blow over, ha, ha, ha!"

-- Jack Aubrey

 

Builds:

Yankee Hero, Fannie Gorham, We’re Here, Dapper Tom (x3), New Bedford Whaler, US Brig Lawrence (Niagara), Wyoming (half hull), Fra Berlanga (half hull), Gokstad Viking Ship, Kate Cory, Charles Morgan, Gjoa

Posted
15 hours ago, Srodbro said:


One could easily argue ( if needed) that your choice actually is the scaled color, that the “ real” color is much darker than your choice, 
Looks great to me. 

Actually, Steve, the photo makes the new color lighter than in reality. As you say, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder!

Tom

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

OK, now I've gotten the red toned down, and applied the below waterline paint. I've elected not to use the copper plates that come with the kit. There is no reference in the

book about the bottom of the ship, and because she is described as being a plain and lumbering craft, I thought copper would be too fancy for her. Besides, it saves a lot of time to paint.

217700868_2-6-23portqtr.jpg.ee6f490217f183ee536f7d4411a0832c.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...