Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (Only 36 donations so far out of 49,000 members - C'mon guys!) ×

Jim Lad

Moderators
  • Posts

    9,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Lad

  1. If they're too long then you're wasting good rope, laddie! Seriously, only use as much rope as is really needed - rope is expensive stuff and the more rope you buy the less profit to the owners. John
  2. Hello, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  3. Another warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. he looks a lovely yacht and will make a fine model. john
  4. Hello Clark, and a warm welcome to MSW from 'Down Under'. John
  5. She's certainly come a long way since I last looked in. First class work, Allan. John
  6. Bill, you might need to do a little experimenting with the vangs. Their purpose is to stop the spencer gaff from sagging too far to leeward when the sail is set, so try them and see what looks logical. Remember that the 'criss cross' pattern you talk about is simply a pretty way of rigging the boat falls - their proper place is rigged to the boats and not crossed to the opposite davit, so you can choose to rig them to the boats if you like and avoid any problems of which side the vangs should be. John
  7. OK, Bill. The vangs wouldn't be a problem - they could simply be let go when a boat was to be swung out. John
  8. The "brick pattern" is indeed the copper sheaving. The actual hull planks were as long as practically possible as they contributed in large part to the longitudinal strength of the ship. John
  9. The course sheets would lead in through bulwark sheaves and then forward along the bulwark rail to the winch. You can see this clearly in Woodget's photograph of the ship at sea. What spencer rigging are you concerned about. John
  10. Hello Daniele, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  11. Been away for a few days, Steve, so I missed your previous post. A job very well done indeed! John
  12. Bill, I found a couple of paintings on the National Maritime Museum (Greenwich) web site. They are of ships from the mid 1850's, but will give you an idea of the look. they are the 'Mermaid' and the 'Schomburg'. John
  13. Bill, The spanker boom always remains fixed to its gooseneck at the mast. I believe the Cutty Sark had a standing gaff - ie. it is fixed to the mast by a gooseneck and supported by a span. If this is the case, the spanker was brailed in to the mast. There are outhauls and inhauls at both the boom and gaff and three (probably) brails up the after end of the sail which lead in to the mast and then down to pins at the foot of the mast. When the sail was furled it was brought in to the mast rather than down to the boom. I'm afraid I can't lay my hands on a photo of a furled spanker at the moment, but I'm sure you get the idea. John
  14. Just checking in. She's really looking very nice indeed! John
  15. That looks a very good base for your outer planking. John
  16. Hello Guy, and another warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  17. That's a very 'swish' looking clamp! John
  18. Hello, and a warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  19. Tom, even up to the end of commercial sailing ships in the early 20th century, it was common not to have ratlines on the uppermost mast sections. in his book 'The Last Grain Race' (describing a sailing ship voyage to Australia and back in the barque Moshulu in 1938/39), Eric Newby describes his fear at having to 'shin' up the last section of the mast to the cap. John
  20. Hello Lynn, and another warm welcome to the forum from 'Down Under'. John
  21. Sorry to hear about your sister-in-law, Mario. Yes, I have a build in progress, but it's at the museum and I haven't been allowed back in there since March! Soon I hope. I hope you and your family are out of the line of fire of these Californian wildfires that have been making the news over here. John
×
×
  • Create New...