Louie da fly
-
Posts
7,952 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Louie da fly
-
End view of the first pair of wales in place, with the screws removed. I'm pretty happy with it - seems to have worked well, and good symmetry. I've bend one of the next pair of wales to shape, but will have to wait till the weekend to do the other one. In the meantime I'm smoothing it off, firstly with a file and then with wet and dry sandpaper. Steven
-
Thanks for the compliment, Druxey. The push pins are currently taking the place of the gunwale. They'll have to stay till I put it in position. I think it's interesting how much more elegant the ship looks with the 'tail' in place. Without it, she doesn't look bad, just a bit ordinary. With it, she has style! Steven
-
The keel is now in place and I've taken away the rubber bands. It seems to be nice and straight, and no problems. After that I went on to glue the lower pair of wales to the frames. I'd previously steam-bent them to the closest approximation I could of their final shape. I got them closer and closer to the right curve, but I was never able to get them in contact with the frames all the way along - there were always a couple of places where they were about a millimetre off. In the long run I decided to screw them down into contact with the frames and hope that I'd got them close enough to maintain a natural shape for the hull. Who knows, the wales might have a smoother curve than I'd managed when I carved the plug. And this is a theoretical reconstruction, after all. If the hull is a millimetre wider than I'd planned, it shouldn't make much difference overall. Nobody knows for sure exactly how wide dromons were anyway - I had to guess the beam when I first did the drawings. So I've resolved not to worry too much about it. If it comes out a little skewiff, I'll just have to accept that as the price of pushing the outside of the envelope. Some time ago I had a small accident and the stern "tail" broke off the keel at the weakest point, the scarph joint holding it to the sternpost. This didn't affect things while I was working on the keel, but the second pair of wales will have to be glued to the "tail", so it was time to put it back on. I extended the clingwrap the plug was wrapped in so it went past the join and added another piece of clingwrap to make sure of things. With a bit of luck it will prevent the glue from sticking the "tail" to the plug so it won't cause problems when I remove the hull from the plug. I used a rubber band to hold it in place and alignment. Fortunately the push pins made good anchoring points for the rubber band to exert the forces in the right direction to keep the tail lined up. My next task is the second pair of wales. It takes quite a while to get them properly, so I might be away for some time . . . (like Captain Oates) Steven
-
That's my major worry, Druxey. I'm doing all I can to minimise any warping tendency, but only time will tell. If I'd used properly seasoned timber and built the model on good solid bulkheads - or even heavier frames - the problem wouldn't have arisen. However, I'm confident the keel is now ok and I'm steaming and bending the wales so they're symmetrical about the keel and lie as close as possible to their true finished shape without having to be forced there. I've pre-bent all the frames and they are so thin that no individual one will impose much warping force, but collectively they might. But if I've been careful enough it will all come together. I've probably bitten off a bit more than I can chew trying to do more than my current skills allow, but I wanted to try this out. And if it all works - well, I'll feel I've really achieved something. If not - it's a learning experience. Robin - I've always loved Donald Sutherland in that movie. "Have a little faith, baby - have a little faith". Steven
-
After a long pause when family matters got in the way, and the model sneered at me whenever I went past, I've been able to do some more on the build. I discovered a major problem - the wood I was using for the keel and frames was not properly seasoned - I'd picked it up from the roadside after the street-tree trimmers had been past and hadn't left it long enough before I used it. That didn't matter for the frames - they're so thin they can take any shape. But I discovered that the keel, which had been straight when I made it, had warped dramatically. I first thought of making another keel, but none of the other pieces I had were straight enough to use as they were - and I had the keel just the shape I wanted it (except for the warp). So I put it in my trusty bending jig made out of a plank and some nails (see pics in previous log entries), wet the keel under the tap and steamed it straight again with a heat gun. It took a lot of trial and error, steaming and bending, checking against the hull, and steaming and bending again, but it finally worked! FINALLY, I've been able to glue the keel to the frames, and remove the line of push-pins along the keel. I held the keel in place with a number of rubber bands. Once the glue on the main frames was dry I was able to remove the rubber bands. Most of the frames are in a single piece and I could glue them directly to the keel where they pass over it, but the curve at the bow and stern is too acute, and the frames had to be made in two pieces - port and starboard. I was able to end-glue these frames to the keel and it seemed to work. I clamped the ones at the extreme ends to the keel with bulldog clips because push-pins couldn't go in at the correct angle to hold them against the keel properly (not shown in photo). So now all the frames are on and I've started on getting the wales shaped exactly (again by repeated trial and error bending and steaming) so they will give the hull some proper structural shape of its own - currently it's only held in shape by the plug. I'd put up some photos, only my camera has chosen this time to commit suicide. When it's fixed I'll post some. Steven
-
Dick, I've seen a lot of representations of ships that are identical to carracks except that they have only a single mast - for lack of a better name I call them 'proto-carracks'. Not only prior to the carrack 'high period', but contemporary with it as well - I've come to believe these contemporary ones were simply smaller than full-fledged carracks and didn't need all those masts - like a cutter in relation to a frigate. And yes, almost no sheer in this picture. Steven
-
Yes, sheer is really a curve, not a straight line. But over a short enough distance it approximates a straight line and you can get a fair idea of the slope at that point. Steven
-
I don't know how sheer is expressed in maritime terms, but slope in ground and on roofs is expressed either in degrees to the horizontal plane (e.g. 30 degrees) or in the amount of vertical distance compared with the horizontal distance - for example a roof that falls 1 metre in 20 metres of horizontal length would have a 1:20 (or 1 in 20) fall. These measurements are different ways of expressing the same thing - for example a 30 degree angle is equivalent to a fall of 1 in 1.732. Probably the easiest way to express sheer would be in vertical vs horizontal distances. Steven
-
Oh, it wasn't a criticism, just interested. Personally I think your interpretation is probably closer to the reality than the pictures are - representing foreshortening in a two-dimensional picture is always difficult and I think it often gets exaggerated by the artist. About how much sheer do you think you have on the quarter deck and the poop - i.e. what vertical distance compared with the horizontal distance? As the knighthead is in the shape of a person's head, maybe the dot is his eye? Steven PS: I like that jig you have for the model - does that swivel so you can get at the model from all angles?
-
It doesn't look like there's much sheer on the decks, even the quarter and poop decks, Dick. Is that right, or am I seeing things? In that three-quarter view looking from the bow it certainly looks that way. Steven
-
It's been a while since I checked your build, and I can only say how impressed I am with what you've achieved. I have to make shields as well for my dromon and so far I haven't found a satisfactory way to do it. Maybe I can emulate your method. Can you provide some more detail on how you went about it? Steven
- 473 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- greek bireme
- dusek
- (and 1 more)
-
Me too, Robin. Really I only get to work on the model on the weekends, and if family or household things need to be done, the weekend can fly past with next to nothing achieved. I'm very much learning as I go, and sometimes things just don't work out the way I want. I made a scraper to cut the rebate in the keel and it works after a fashion, but not as well as I'd hoped - maybe it's my technique. Until that's fixed I can't put the keel in place and then start planking. That's my big goal - I'll actually have a hull, not just a block of wood. After that I think the rest of the build be - I won't say easy - but at least not so frustrating. I have to tell myself Soit patient, as the French say. Steven
-
Very very interesting. I've occasionally thought about RC but decided it was all too complicated. Maybe I'll change my mind after this. By the way, do you have any problems with the control cords chafing? They seem to be going through a couple of holes cut in metal plate immediately after they leave the spool. Am I right in thinking that the ship is controlled completely by the sails without the rudder? Steven
- 97 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- macedonian
- frigate
- (and 2 more)
-
Nice work on the blocks, Dick. And the ship is looking better and better. Steven
-
That's pretty much what my wife said - though she didn't say anything about a centipede (but that was when I'd only just started, so the centipede analogy wasn't as obvious).
-
I discovered that if I held the handle of the pin in a pair of pliers and pushed inwards while twisting it back and forth, the pin would go in nice and tight. So I've managed to get all the frames onto the plug much faster than I expected, and without damaging my thumb. Note - all the starboard pins are green and the port ones are red (well, a lot of them are pink, but it was the best I could do). Probably won't be able to do anything else till next weekend, but finally making progress. Next step is to cut the rabbet in the keel and then put the keel in place and glue it to the frames.
-
I thought of it, but they're not controllable enough - they tend to pull to one side or another no matter what you do to prevent it. At least I know this works - I just have to take a little longer, that's all (to allow my thumbs to recover). Steven
-
Well, after a false start or two I've finally started framing. First I made a jig to support the plug upside down high enough off the table to provide clearance for the 'tail' at the stern, with a wide enough base to keep it from toppling and destroying all my beautiful frames. The plug is screwed to two pieces of 70x45mm (3"x 2") pine wall framing and to a base of 140x19mm (6" x 1/2") pine plank. Very rigid, very stable. I wrapped the plug in cling-wrap to keep the glue from sticking the frames to the plug,then drilled something like 190 1 millimetre (1/25") diameter holes in the plug to take a line of push-pins each side of the keel and another line just below the "gunwale" (guns hadn't been invented in the 11th century) on each side to keep the frames in position and lined up. I first tried using just a single line of pins each side at gunwale level, but the frames bowed down below the bottom of the plug with a gap of up to 2mm between the frame and the plug, and wouldn't stay square. Using 4 pins per frame seems to work quite well, and helps keep them square to the keel. I already had one lot of holes from the earlier attempt but I had to drill more because I'd discovered in a lot of places the push pins for adjacent frames were too close together and fouled each other, and I needed another line of holes - between every 1st and third hole, in line with the frames, but offset far enough from the other line of holes so they were clear of the other pins. (I only broke one drill bit - not bad considering how thin the drill-bits are and that I was just using a hand-held electric drill!) I've just started putting the frames in position and it seems to be working well, except for very sore thumbs from pushing the pins into the plug. They need to be tight to grip properly so I have to force them in, which is hard on my thumbs. Add to that the first failed experiment with only two pins per frame, and it adds up to a lot of pressure on the pads of the thumbs. They're not all perfectly square and spaced, but once they're all in position I can go back and tweak them. I have 11 frames in place - only 113 to go! Steven PS: My wife says it looks like I'm giving the ship a perm!
-
I thought that might be the reason. A clever idea. The build is looking very good. Steven
-
Very nice, clean, precise work. It looks like it will be a very good model. The gun carriages look a bit unusual - I've never seen any that looked like that. Steven
-
That's very interesting. I suppose it depends on how strongly they were built. And if the construction was too weak, they'd find out the hard way - if they survived. [edit] Maybe that's why forcastles changed from rectangular to triangular in the 15th century - too much overhang? Steven
-
Uniforms of the Royal Navy and Marines circa 1724?
Louie da fly replied to timboat's topic in Nautical/Naval History
An interesting theory. Whether it has anything to do with the reality, I have no idea. Steven -
Uniforms of the Royal Navy and Marines circa 1724?
Louie da fly replied to timboat's topic in Nautical/Naval History
Maybe they didn't. I think that's more Hollywood than reality. I don't know enough about Samurai to comment, but our ideas of pirates are formed more from fiction than fact. As far as the military goes, well, red's a bright colour; but maybe there were plenty of other coloured sashes as well.
Our Emblem ®
