Jump to content

ccoyle

Moderators
  • Posts

    9,751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ccoyle

  1. Yep, sorry to say, but in the absence of any documented provenance for your model, it is extremely unlikely that it is a 120-year-old, one-off, scratch build. It may have been owned by your great-grandfather, as that possibility certainly fits the timescale, but the model itself is typical of the sort that were mass-produced in various parts of Europe during the first decades of the 20th century. That doesn't necessarily mean that it has no value. If it has been in your family for a long time, then it certainly has sentimental value, which shouldn't be discounted. Beyond that, though, any monetary value it might have depends on a number of factors, such as exact age, date of production, and whether it is a well-preserved example of the genera. Even if you know all of those things, there's still no guarantee of value -- that particular determination can only be made by a knowledgeable nautical antiques dealer.
  2. You can say that again! I always tell people that the problem with do it yourself projects is that when I finish one, it looks like I did it myself! 🙄
  3. Welcome aboard, Joe!
  4. I had a similar experience years ago with resolving a worker's compensation claim. Such things do certainly try one's patience.
  5. Very handsomely done! Congratulations!
  6. Such a sharp-looking vessel -- it would have been nice to see pictures. But, I hope your coworker enjoys it for years to come. Cheers!
  7. You really took this kit model up a notch (or two or three) -- really a superb finished product!
  8. I should clarify -- I only drill pilot holes through first layer planking, i.e. through plank and into bulkhead, then pin as Ross describes. I've always used a combination of heat and CA to apply the second layer veneer -- no pins.
  9. Here's another vote for ditching the brass nails. Use clamps, or if you need to temporarily pin something, use cheap push pins after drilling an appropriately sized pilot hole. The pins can be tapped in with a tack hammer.
  10. Upon further scrutiny of Mr. Okumoto's videos, I found a scene where he does appear to have removed some interior wood before mating the frames and keel together. And here as well . . .
  11. That's got to be among the lowest numbers of bulkheads per unit of hull length that I've ever seen in a kit. You were wise to add filler blocks!
  12. Not to airplane nerds! 😅 I have the 1:33 scale card model of the Defiant from Orlik. Sadly, I don't have a preformed canopy for it, and the turret construction looks awfully intimidating.
  13. Welcome aboard!
  14. Hello, Stan! You can find all of the info we have at this site by clicking here. This includes a build log of the same kit in progress, along with images of the prototype model built by Kolderstok's owner, Hans. But before clicking the link, why not tell us a little something about yourself? Also,be sure to start a build log for your project -- that's the best way to get advice on the fly. Cheers!
  15. Welcome, Scotty, and do please start a build log! Your hull looks great. As for your boom jaws, I wouldn't bother with the brass strip. Jaws were normally built from wood. Have a look around the gallery or do an internet search for boom jaws and you should be able to find some examples.
  16. The small size of the model and its unusual manner of construction will make such removal difficult, if not impossible. That's part of the dilemma. Mind you, this is interior fairing I'm wondering about. One of the reasons I asked whether just leaving it as-is would be a viable option is that there isn't an 'interior' to this model -- other than the interior sides of the frames, there isn't much of anything else. Like I said, it's stylized, so I'm inclined to believe that leaving the insides un-faired would be a forgivable sin.
×
×
  • Create New...