ccoyle

Congratulations, Rusty! That is simply a fantastic model!

Welcome aboard, Chaz!

Based on your question, I'm assuming you have the 1/96 scale Shipyard kit? The cheapest way to get 1 mm card is to look for chipboard at a print shop. It's the stuff used for backing scratch pads and the like. It's terribly hard on craft knife blades, though. You can also laminate sheets of thinner card stock together using 3M spray adhesive until you obtain the desired thickness.

If you haven't seen it yet, we have a card modeling tutorial in the card section of the ship kits discussion area.

Ahoy!

Well, it is time to start a new build log. For those of you who might be saying, "Hey, don't you already have, like, three other unfinished builds in progress?", I will simply observe that what you say is true, but I'm starting a new log anyway, so there! Anyways, I haven't been doing much modeling lately because I have a six-month-old, very active puppy, and for that same reason I may not make speedy progress on this model, either, but we'll see.

The Subject

The subject of this log is Leroy Grumman's famous F4F-4 Wildcat. I won't go into too much detail about this airplane, because if you are reading this then you are probably sufficiently airplane nerdy to already have a good grasp of the Wildcat's place in history. It will suffice here to say that the Wildcat was America's front-line, carrier-borne fighter for the first year-and-a-half of the country's war against Japan. Although the Wildcat is frequently compared unfavorably with the Mitsubishi A6M 'Zero', I think it is fair to say that the Wildcat, when flown to its strengths by a skilled aviator, could hold its own in a scrap with the Japanese fighter. You can read more about the Wildcat here.

The Kit

The kit is a brand new offering from the Polish firm of WAK. In fact, at the time of this writing the kit is still listed as 'NEW' on the company's website. This will actually be the first time I have ever worked on a hot-off-the-press kit, so you should all feel fortunate to be among the first to see one of these being built -- perhaps not likely to be among the first to see one finished, but close enough. The kit is designed by Jerzy Janukowicz, with artwork by Marcin Dworzecki, who is famous in the card modeling world for his work done for Kartonowy Arsenal (Halinski). Let's have a look, shall we?

The kit depicts the personal mount of the famous Lt. Cdr. John S. "Jimmy" Thach, the man who perfected the "Thach weave," a combat tactic that allowed a Wildcat pilot and his wingman to get a drop on the more maneuverable Zero. As you can see in the photo, I also have the laser-cut frames for the kit. Now, I took a bit of a gamble by not buying a canopy for this kit, since I already had one on hand, albeit for the ancient Halinski F4F-3 kit. I'm not aware of any changes made by Grumman to the canopy for the dash-4, so I'm cautiously optimistic that the dash-3 canopy will fit.

Lots of lovely diagrams.

And beautiful graphics. Don't be alarmed by the printed wheels -- there's an option to build the kit wheels-up, which I will probably not elect to build.

The back cover has pictures of the prototype model.

A nice touch in this kit is the inclusion of instructions in English.

To wrap up this introduction, I thought you all might like to see a little comparison of this kit with the older Halinski F4F-3 kit published in 1998.

A side-by-side view of the graphics (I don't believe Marcin did the art for this Halinski kit) reveals the nearly complete lack of weathering on the older kit (at left). The difference in detail is even more stark for the cockpit interiors (not shown) -- the older kit has almost no three-dimensional details at all.

Well, that's it for the introduction -- hope to get started soon!

Nice work, Doc!

That's a fantastic model, Daniel!

1 hour ago, Canute said:

vacu-form

Yes, my brain was drawing a blank on the correct term. Also, the box art for the fittings set suggests that the kit is rather long in the tooth (as was also noted in the OP). If it were me, I would be very hesitant about plunking down the necessary change for after-market parts to use with a sketchy kit.

7 hours ago, mikegr said:

by the way i cant figure out about the hull, is it ready or need to plank it

It looks to me that the hull is pre-molded plastic -- the black item in the second photo.

The product description suggests that it is not a complete kit. A detail set must be purchased separately.

Welcome aboard! Very nice work so far!

2 hours ago, CDW said:

Do you know of a card model of this aircraft in 1:33 scale? 

I do, actually. Answer published one in 2006.

And here is a finished example, although the usual caveat about Polish builders and their uncanny abilities applies here.

Welcome aboard from a Humboldt County ex-pat!

Sorry to hear about your mother, George. Good to hear that her family was able to be with her.

Your model is coming along nicely.

My LGS had an 1895 Nagant listed just a couple of days ago -- sans boarding axe, though.

Nicely done!

12 hours ago, Egilman said:

Artwork like this is a labor of love brother... Anyone can slap together a model, it takes a MODELER to make a piece of art....

It takes a rare set of skills to elevate a plastic model to the realm of art -- which partly explains why I stick to card models! 😂

You have a handsome helper!

Interesting that there is a plastic kit company called Fly, seeing that there is also a Polish card model publisher going by the same name.

What a great finish, James! And I agree with Chuck that this lovely kit should be a big hit, especially with those of us Yanks who have been clamoring for American subjects from VM.

Ahoj!

That looks like a great kit! Any chance you could post some pictures of the completed prototype model?

34 minutes ago, LegoKing5522 said:

i am sorry for the long delay

Ha! I'm still waiting to put the final touches on my HMS Fly kit that I started in 2006!

Great work, Rob!

44 minutes ago, Cowboy said:

My question is are the masts supposed to be perpendicular to the deck? Mine turned out to be leaning slightly astern.

Is the lean of the masts due to the arrangement of slots and holes in the hull? Does the lean match the rake shown in the plans? Will knowing there is a lean keep you awake at night?

That last question is the kicker.

37 minutes ago, Spooky spoon said:

The last thing I have to do is decide whether or not to do rigging.

If I have to do rigging, then you have to do rigging! 😜

Gary,

This is just the type of craft upon which to work your magic. I will be following along with interest.

10 hours ago, GrandpaPhil said:

They have a pretty decent selection of ironclads and pre-Dreadnoughts

This is a bit of an understatement. Orel actually have one of the most extensive catalogs of such subjects of any publisher, if not the most extensive. And they are very prolific compared to some publishing houses. It pays to check their website (papermodeling.net) frequently.