ccoyle

Welcome aboard 'Vitus' (not the original, I presume!) and good luck with your project!

So, to wrap up today's little adventure, here is the finished frame. There are 26 more frames to build up, and they all look more or less like this one, so in the absence of much in the way of variety, I may not post much in the near future (and will be out-of-town for ten days, too). Cheers!

👆 What he said!! 👆

The construction of this kit is proving less straightforward than one might have hoped, as seen in the following set of images. Frame 5 is the first full-width frame. Parts A5-1 and A5-2 (forgive me for forgetting to add the '5' part to all of the labels on the photos!) were easy enough to find on their sheets and assemble, but then we ran into a mystery with parts F5-1 and F5-2. First of all, there are four parts labeled as F5-2 on the parts sheets, but only two are needed, and, as you can see, the pairs of F5-2 parts are not all the same length. No problem, I figured -- one of the two pairs must be F5-1. The shorter F5-2s matched the dimensions on the frame diagram, so I deduced that the longer pair must be F5-1. Except the F5-1s did not match the frame diagram contours at all. After some head-scratching and additional fret searching, I found the real F5-1. It all made sense now. Except . . . now it appears that I have a surplus pair of futtocks (F5-1)?? Mysteries and more mysteries! Back to head-scratching!

There can be no argument that Surprise would be a hot seller, and of course the Watton household needs to eat, but I will argue every day of the week and twice on Sunday for one of the American sloops-of-war, e.g. Peacock, or the matched set of Shannon & Chesapeake. But any VM kit will be a winner.

No harm in setting it aside for now and coming back to it when you feel better prepared.

Yup. Gonna need a whole lot more information.

Welcome, Andre! Stunning helicopters!

Witam, Pitr! You are doing such a lovely job with this model. I realize you are modifying the basic kit, but it still makes me want to give one of the Shipyard models a try someday. Cheers! Robisz cudowną robotę z tym modelem. Zdaję sobie sprawę, że modyfikujesz podstawowy zestaw, ale mimo to mam ochotę kiedyś wypróbować jeden z modeli Shipyard.

To tack on to what others have said about this kit, one thing that can be said for Model Shipways kits in general is that they don't engage in hand-holding -- they assume that the builder is bringing a certain amount of skill and knowledge to the party. If you don't know how to do a task like strop a block, for example, Model Expo instructions do not usually tell you how to do it; you will need to consult some outside resources, such as books on 18th century rigging practices. Also, Model Shipways kits have far fewer pre-cut parts than other kits; oftentimes, you are given only the requisite wood materials and are expected to take the dimensions off the plans (proportional dividers are handy for this task). Same goes for things like determining the position of the wales, locating scuppers, etc. -- that information is provided in the plans and is not described in any great detail anywhere. If you don't mind my asking, since you are new here and you say this is your first intermediate kit, what kinds of kits have you finished before this one? Don't be fooled by the word "intermediate" on this kit -- that term is relative. It's certainly intermediate compared to tackling an ornately decorated 17th-century ship of the line, but it still has plenty of elements (e.g. guns, three masts, square-rigged) that a modeler may find very challenging, and it is certainly more challenging than other types of models that have less of those elements and are therefore more intermediate-friendly, such as a brigs, cutters, or schooners. Your answer to this question may suggest that a simpler model would be better suited to your current skill level. Kind regards,

Here's a quick update. Each cant frame is made of four pieces. The laser-cut parts have no tabs and literally drop right out of their frets, which is why the manufacturer has taped the back side of each fret. It would obviously be foolhardy to remove the tape all at one go; instead, I remove only as much as is needed to release each part. There are 31 frame stations along the hull, so as I complete each frame, I use some leftover tape to label it with its station number and, for cant frames, which side it goes on. This process worked well until I got to cant frames #4 and discovered that two of the futtocks for these frames are missing (the same part for each side). I checked all of the frets three times and then checked the parts sheet drawings as well. Yep -- that part # somehow did not get included. I'm going to have to make replacement parts from some scrap material. I think that Mr. Dremel Tool and I will be able to make short work of this task, but it is mildly annoying when one discovers that a kit is missing some parts.

Coincidentally, our family also has a Bean (it rhymes with her given name, Kathleen), although I'm probably the only one who calls her that with any regularity. Ironically, her dog is also named Maisy.

Welcome aboard from your neighbor to the south!

Very nice!

Welcome aboard!

Congratulations -- she looks great!

Welcome aboard! Sounds like you got your hands on a Shipyard kit. We have a small group of enthusiastic card modelers lurking about here. I built Shipyard's Wuetender Hund wood kit a couple of years ago.

Now my brain hurts.

I'm not pickin' up what yer layin' down. The right-hand drawing makes the frame appear to be bent, or curved, which is impossible to do with the 3 mm thick pieces.

Okay, hit my first big snag already! This instruction basically says "build the cant frames." Sounds easy enough. Except I can't for the life of me figure out how to interpret the 1:1 scale drawings for the cant frames. The image on the left I was able to solve, as it simply shows the overlapping frame pieces (four in total). It's the drawing on the right that I can't figure out. As you can see in the image that comes later in the construction manual, the cant frames need beveling (duh), but they don't appear to be bent in any way -- seen from the side, they appear to be straight up-and-down. So what am I reading wrong in the drawing?? 🤔

Looks-wise, they both look good, but off the top of my head i can't tell you which one would be a better choice for your subject.

Wow! I'll just echo the previous comments -- beautiful!

Which may also explain why Mr. Okumoto-san is sold out of this kit!

Okay, so here are the parts for the keel. In the center are the two bits of scrap that I test glued and let dry over night. I couldn't get them apart with finger pressure, not even while twisting them, so the char does not appear to be a problem for gluing. Here's a close-up showing a laser-cut edge. Like I said earlier, the char is medium-brown in color, not black, and personally I kind of like the bit of contrast. But what do you think? Fly's name plate arrived in the mail today, but I will wait until the "big reveal" to show what it looks like with the model.

As a kid, I built Revell's 1/72 scale version of Goering's mount.