Jump to content

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. Ask @dafi or @Hubac's Historian, they are rather experienced in rebuilding plastic kits...... I think they do not use knifes but a steel needle. Jan
  2. Would be my advice too. Stern is OK, so modifying that will draw attention to any imperfections. just adjust rhe irons,a nd leave the woodwork as is. Jan
  3. Wow, didn’t do anything for over a year. Didn’t realize that it was that long. Must be the longest (intime) more or less running buildlog in MSW. Anyway: did some work on the port-side gunport lids. See you all in oktober 2021 Jan
  4. Trying to become an another 'armchair expert' (btw did not succeed so far), I spent some time looking at pics of this ship class. you already knew ofcourse, but these 'interbellum-designs' have beautiful lines. I also came across some drawings showing them in the 'old fashioned' white-yellow paint scheme. That would be a nice contrast: another of this class in another scheme. Or are those drawings just fantasy? Jan
  5. Railing adds to the realism. Well done. (and apart from a few nerds, no one will count bars) Jan
  6. The flag is much better in looks and feel, but I think it is the wrong side connected to the pole: as far as I know, the little cross should be on the side of the pole. Jan
  7. Chuck explains it here. (In his log of Cheerful) Printing on very thin paper. Sounds easy. But I guess some trial and error is needed before it works.
  8. Looking good. Is there a way to get the flag hanging somewhat more realistically? "Hanging" like this it does no justice to the realism of your model. Jan
  9. Which is not compatible with the location of the wreck. The zuiderzee was a rather shallow, relatively large open water, with in some locations a bogland between water and coast. No way vessels could be drawn. same holds for 'favorable wind': winds can be from the same direction for weeks. Waiting for favorable winds can take some time. Interesting to see a mast like this. Never saw one in the context of Dutch shipbuilding. But then, medieval ships never my main interest Jan
  10. Ah well, didn't see that on the pic. All the same, I am a bit puzzled by the fact that it seems tha although the important information is on the 'land-part', more ink has been spent on the ships. But on most maritime charts, the compass rose is drawn with at least 8 points, there are some bearings on landmarks etc. This is more like a landowners map, trying to find the best place for his new development.... You say there is a copy of the map dated 1750. Does that one have the ships also? Jan
  11. I don't know how it was in the UK, but in the Netherlandse (and other "EU-countries") larges sheets of paper were often/always made with a watermark. This mark can be quite helpfull in dating the map (at least biy providing a time-fence). By the looks of the map itself, I would vote for late, rather than early. Also: the detail of the roads (canals?) are far better drawn than the details of the coastline. My guess would be that the printer of this map did a nice job on the street-layout, and just put a nice lithograph of the ships in the part where there were no streets to display. (in which case he would have copied the nice painting in his (grand)fathers house, and thus display ships of an aera already gone by th date of the map) Jan
  12. I checked the Vasa-forum, and there Fred Hocker describes that on Vasa the inhaul and outhaul tackles were actually the same tackles. Inhaul actually not very often needed, so if needed, the outhaul was released from theringbolt in the side, and attached to the ri gbolt inthe deck. the inhaul was probably rigged to the ringbolt on the other side of the deck. Jan
  13. probably while this doesn’t look like normal rigged deadeyes, there seems to be some strap over them. Besides: all other stays visible in the pics are rigged with some sort of turnbuckle-like construction. Jan
  14. They do not show a considerable amount of detail, but in the Dutch Rijksmuseum collection, there are a couple of pics of Loreley. I took screenshots, and copied the link https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/NL/collectie/RP-F-F01148-M https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-F-F01148-I https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/zoeken/objecten?q=S.m.s.+Loreley&p=1&ps=12&st=Objects&ii=0#/RP-F-F01148-Y,0 This one is frustrating: it shows the channels, but not the deadeyes. https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/zoeken/objecten?q=S.m.s.+Loreley&p=1&ps=12&st=Objects&ii=4#/RP-F-F01148-J,4 Holidaypics from a distant period....
  15. And in your second picture they look more like "normal deadeyes". I have once seen (and I blame myself for not remembering where) a nice illustration of the systems that have been invented in the rather short period between the mid-1850's when wooden deadeyes were standard, and the early 1900's, when steel turnbuckles were the standard. I thought it was on segelschiffsmodellbau, but the man I thought that posted denied doing so.... Still thinking and searching ….. Jan
  16. That is really a close call. Both look great. As you say: choice depends on the actual part you are looking at. I prefer the Eduards-version because of the breachlock does look a bot more detailed. But taking the handwheels as your main part, the other one is (marginally) better, at least in the pics. I guess that placed on the model both will be looking fantastic..... Jan
  17. Sounds like you have a nice organ. I try to find my way on a small, not so nice, early 20th century one. Bach doens't quite fit to something like that, and Mendelsohn is above my league I like the 'Psalmbewerkingen in Noord-Duitse stijl' van Sietze de Vries (also not fit for my instrument, but at least I can play them ) I'll folow your upcoming build. Not quite a plastic/small scale myself (actually, almost no modelbuilding left in my sparese time) but I am surprised at the precision of those smale-scale models. Jan
×
×
  • Create New...