-
Posts
785 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by woodrat
-
-
On 2017-5-7 at 11:32 AM, Louie da fly said:
Currently I’m at the limit of the detail I can put in just wearing my normal glasses. If I wanted to improve it I’d have to invest in a super-duper magnifying glass, which I’m not prepared to do.
Steven
Steven, I use loupes for all fine work. There are very good magnifying headsets on the market which are not expensive. Better than eyestrain I say.
Dick
- Gerhardvienna, mtaylor and Eddie
-
3
-
3 hours ago, druxey said:
Perhaps one of your Aussie model compatriots with a miniature saw could volunteer to cut planking stock accurately for you? (I know that Oz is very strict about importing wood or other vegetable matter).
I could do this with my Byrnes saw if you let me know dimensions and wood type.
Dick
- mtaylor, Eddie, Louie da fly and 2 others
-
5
-
Steven, great progress and looking fine. I would be careful about extrapolating colours from a mediaeval manuscript to the model. The monk was probably using whatever colours were in the scriptorium. I take your point that it does suggest colours were used. However, most hulls were probably paid with tallow and hair to above the waterline so colouring would be used sparingly above this level. Sailors have always liked their ships pretty.
Dick
-
13 hours ago, cog said:
Dick,
I read on another forum, someone used paper handkerchiefs and formed them over a baloonish formed bottle (something like the Chianti "basket" bottles) Can't recall whether he used white glue or something else
Thanks Carl. That sounds like a form of papier mache which could work. Thats sort of what I had in mind but I need to experiment a bit with materials and molds. Wish me luck.
Cheers
Dick
-
12 hours ago, druxey said:
It is possible to mold paper to shape over a form. Some varieties of Japanese paper might work well for this, Dick.
Yes, thanks Druxey. A mold is required as you say. I have to experiment a little. As you can see, the central part of the mainsail and bonnet is pulled back toward the mast by a type of lanyard to prevent the sail rubbing on the mainstay. This produces a complex curve unlike those seen on ships of later centuries
-
Oh Dear! That didn't work
. I should have known that paper would not support a curve in two planes at once. Back to plan B I think. If plan B fails the sail furls. I thought the vikings were using woollen sailcloth which would explain the need for quilting.
Dick
- Louie da fly and mtaylor
-
2
-
It is actually number 100 thread glued to the paper. If you look at some illustrations e.g.
the cross hatching is only on the front and not visible on the back. This suggests to me some form of small calibre rope has been sown to the front of the sail. Are there any other possibilities?
I may put a simple cross on the mainsail but will not do more
Cheers
Dick
- JesseLee, cog, Farbror Fartyg and 3 others
-
6
-
Here be the mainsail and two bonnets ready to be connected. Many illustrations show the cross stitching
-
I regret to say, Steven, that I bought the sheaves, although I did blacken them myself. The paper I am trying is acid free calligraphy paper which is a bit like vellum. It is an experiment and may end in tears (pun!)
This shows the paper strips glued with acid-free clear glue. I will do a mainsail with 2 bonnets. One of my other hobbies is bookbinding so this feels OK to me.
Dick
- druxey, mtaylor, CaptainSteve and 9 others
-
12
-
-
before singeing
after singeing
it looks better to me
Dick
-
Thanks Druxey. I did wax the halliards but I might try your singeing. I used a different line which is inferior. I will redo it.
- mtaylor, CaptainSteve, cog and 1 other
-
4
-
- firdajan, Vivian Galad, druxey and 11 others
-
14
-
Yes, four rows of parrels. However, the problem is how to attach them in such a way as the parrels can be loosened and tightened as required for adjustment of the position of the yard on the mast. Many of the contemporary illustrations show the yard positioned at varying distances from the top. This may have been a way to adjust for varying wind strengths and directions (?)
Dick
This is one of the best illustrations of running rigging to the mainsail
-
On 10/03/2017 at 4:36 PM, Matle said:
For what it's worth, I remember an original drawing of an 18th century Swedish galley showing the same concave-convex arrangement on the joint of the two halves of each yard. So it seems like a persistent technology.
Yes. It survived well into last century as this photo of a dhow from 1972 attests.
This the mainyard ready to be swayed up
-
Flat surfaces would be subject to shear forces and would need reinforcement with trenails , bolts or nails, all of which would weaken the wood and lead to splitting. the concave /convex joint reinforced with rope is strong and not rigid. Moreover iron hoops are difficult to make and apply and rope is readily available and cheap.
Dick
- Louie da fly, rybakov, cog and 5 others
-
8
-
The next step is the mainyard. In mediterranean vessels the mainyard was made of 2 spars bound together. The combined length is approximately the length of the keel and the two spard overlap by 50%. It is an error to apply 17th or 18th century preconceptions to these yards. They are very different and a lot longer than many Santa Maria models depict. Once again the paintings of Carpaccio come up as the best source. But even Carpaccio leaves things out, in this case the forestay.
The mainyard is held to the mast by parrels. The bigger the vessel, the more rows of parrels. In my case there will be four rows of parrels.
note that one spar has a concave cross section and the other convex
-
this shows a closeup of the attachment of the shrouds to the mast by looping over pegs inserted in the mast. This may seem odd in that the usual arrangement we are used to is looping the shroud through crosstrees and AROUND the mast. I chose this method because the Trombetta drawing of the mast being set up shows the fighting top already in place BEFORE the shrouds were rigged. This method is also seen in some models close to this period.
Dick
-
Thanks Druxey. Those carracks depicted without ratlines showed a wide spread of shrouds fore and aft. In addition the use of tackles and pendants would allow easy adjustment of shroud tension at the price of less strength. Dick
- Louie da fly, cog, mtaylor and 1 other
-
4
-
Thanks Jesse and Moonbug. The Mataro nao has been a major resource for this build. Anyone building a late mediaeval carrack such as Santa Maria should have a close look at it. Xavier Pastors Anatomy of the Ship volume on the Ships of Columbus uses the Mataro nao for its reconstruction. Dick
- CaptainSteve, Moonbug, mtaylor and 1 other
-
4
-
I do apologize for my tardiness in updating this log. I have been in the process of restructuring my professional committments and, consequently, have neglected the more enjoyable of my pursuits. I have, however, finally worked out the likely method that was used to laterally stabilize the mainmast. The shrouds are passed inboard, not as in later vessels outboard to chainplates. The pendants from the mainmasts ( more later) are secured by tackles. This is more in keeping with the iconography of the period in mediterranean vessels. It may well have been different in the northern european vessels as illustrated by the drawings by the flemish master WA, which show chainplates. Certainly it would have been vastly simpler for me to secure the pendants outboard but, in shipmodelling, it is sometimes better to aim for accuracy rather than facility. Nonetheless, I offer this as a solution which is consistent with the scanty evidence.
Dick
- shipmodel, Louie da fly, pjofc4 and 16 others
-
19
-
- druxey, dgbot, CaptainSteve and 3 others
-
6
-
I wonder if you already have checked a book called "navi venete" written by Cesare Augusto Levi in 1892.
He made the type of research that you are doing more or less now.
He searched for venetian ships images in every corner of Venice, including anonymous paintings, sculptures, ex-voto, frescos.
The result of his work is inside that book.
It is a book only of drawings, with specificated the source of the image.
It is more precious than that it seems, for your research.
Below a link to the book...
http://www.libreriaeditricefilippi.com/index.php/navi-venete-da-codici-marmi-e-dipinti.html
Cristiano I have now obtained the book by Cesare Augusto Levi. It has quite a number of images of venetian shipping of various centuries. Many are redrawn for the book and there are several images of navi that I have not seen before with interesting rigging details. Thanks for the recommendation. Buon natale
Dick
- cog, CaptainSteve, mmdd and 6 others
-
9
-
Thanks, chaps. I lean to Carl's interpretation which would allow quick belaying of a line.
The stand I use, Steven, is a monitor stand I found in a pawn shop. Indeed, it allows positioning of the ship to facilitate access. Very useful.
How is sheer expressed, as a percentage or a ratio?
Dick
Venetian Carrack or Cocha by woodrat - FINISHED - 1/64
in - Subjects built Up to and including 1500 AD
Posted
After laughable escapades with papier mache and somewhat obscene balloon constructions, the dog ate my mold, really, honest!
So.. I decided to repair and resurrect my first attempt. This was paper strips. After repair, I added Silkspan strips glued transversely to the front of the sail while molding with a Frascati bottle (emptied first).
The resulting mainsail is not perfecto but it gives a reasonable impression of a 15th century mainsail.
prior to attaching to mainmast, I must finish the maintop. This is the base of it.![DSCN1290a.thumb.jpg.13145a7b344671f97ae7d9fc12766d9c.jpg](https://modelshipworld.com/uploads/monthly_2017_05/DSCN1290a.thumb.jpg.13145a7b344671f97ae7d9fc12766d9c.jpg)
Cheerio, Dick