Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My understanding is that the forward end of the little 'platform' was left clear for a sailor to stand on. He cast a lead to make depth soundings (the 'leadsman'). This is why your option 3 for the bill-board, set back even few more inches, is what was most likely; even if not the most aethetic choice.

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Posted

I did't find pictures where there is room enough, that there could someone stand. At later ships, like the Bellona, yes. There is the bolster extrem long forward. But even at her sister ship, the Superb, it would't work. There is't enough headroom I would say.

1774038579_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-13um18_22_40.jpg.5e61c0108d5181067aece1dc84b32e85.jpg

 

Here a picture from the Centurion. That part is there missing, but the notches in the channel indicate its place.

1041368375_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-13um18_15_12.jpg.976f81be45f9d8ee3df215ccc2a7d67a.jpg

 

And here the other 60 gunner from that period. I don't think that there anyone could stand. But at least, they are both parallel sided! The not so parallel sided one are from ships, where the channels are lower and yes some had also this bolster. 

1652178641_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-13um18_16_02.jpg.cad051c8c4c5761b8cd5ab5d961a97ee.jpg

 

When I build that part like version #3, then is there a space 4mm deep and 6 mm long. Means 192 X 28,8mm. That is't really convenient to stand. 

I sleep it over and will see tomorrow what I do.

 

 

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

Good morning,

I must say, most of the billboards where parallel sided, but not all. 

The Yarmouth 1745

1302075374_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-14um09_08_36.jpg.f85dc814f6c57921b1359f14ae1626dc.jpg

 

2084227793_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-14um09_16_03.jpg.3ee6f0c86edea112936efdaea5f87153.jpg

 

and the Royal Oak 1741 for example

984437029_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-14um09_14_51.jpg.a12c1c691e3b887b5b77d591e9955696.jpg

The whole lining is following a curve and I think I should do it also with the Tiger so. Because the channel is set back a little and I found no ship of this time with only at one side of the bolster a free space. 

The Tiger 1747

1082864681_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-14um09_55_40.jpg.4e0523e18969c53e68b9f7f9cda9197e.jpg

 

DSC01807.jpg.72f6208988f0494b0ae617b6ff1c6003.jpg

 

For a sailer to loot water depth is't there much space. It would be the most dangerous working place at the ship. The ruler is to scale in feet.

DSC01806.jpg.e2f48117a0656455dae11aee0e8e3a04.jpg

 

 

 

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

I'm meaning only the style with the bolster or ledge included. I suppose the other place to stand would be higher, on the fore end of the channel. In any case, I believe that the sailor had a line tied around him for safety! However, it's your model, your decision, Siggi.

Be sure to sign up for an epic Nelson/Trafalgar project if you would like to see it made into a TV series  http://trafalgar.tv

Posted

Hello,

the billboards are now also ready. It was't easy because they are twisted a little.

DSC01809.thumb.jpg.04a1fd2218128a3cbbef0bc35ceb00d9.jpg

 

The pictures with them ready where not sharp, so I delated them. 

DSC01812.thumb.jpg.a082e5af52a85abd922fc871b302a27c.jpg

 

DSC01813.thumb.jpg.2395c278bfb670c42301a317b9df6716.jpg

 

The next things at my to do list are the windows at the quarter deck. 🤭 That means tiny carving, but one time I have to do it. 

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

Hello and thank you for your likes,

during the paint at the billboard dried, I made the ropes for the gun port lids. And because I had the ropewalk set up, I made also the ropes for the gammoning. Here I tried also same splices en miniature. The right one was the first, but the second is, I think ok.

DSC01825.thumb.jpg.2a2efd18a2cef7be7d2422dbff30b545.jpg

 

And here the first windows. The smaller ones I have to rebuild, because they separated when I tried to cut them to the right size. The larger one, for the captains gun port, did it well. The only thing is, that the glue made the acrylic glas blind. I don't really know what to do with them. I glued the wood to the acrylic glas with the glue for acrylic, but that solved also the paint from the frames ☹️ 

DSC01819.thumb.jpg.9bd6913b3c5e213461f0920f41f0ba5d.jpg

 

DSC01827.thumb.jpg.8bcefb2042be04b09d42ed88a6e0b7a6.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

The left (2nd) splize is definitely okay!

I can do them in real worlds size and if mine would turn out that neat I'd be very satisfied.

 

Hats off to you Siggi!

Happy modelling!

Håkan

__________________________________________

 

Current build: Atlantica by Wintergreen

Previous builds

Kågen by Wintergreen

Regina by Wintergreen

Sea of Galilee boat, first century, sort of...

Billing Boats Wasa

Gallery:

Kågen (Cog, kaeg) by Wintergreen - 1:30Billing Boats Regina - 1:30Billing Boats Dana

Posted

Siggi, I agree with David, the glass looks great. It looks like glass of that period. Window glass history is pretty interesting, 18th century window glass was very different that todays glass. I'm surprised how large individual panes are depicted in 18th and 19th century models.

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted

Hello and many thanks for your comments and likes

 

Håkan, splicing is't wich work. I did it in real life many times before and here it is only a little smaller 😉 Today I tried one rope at the model, they are too short and too thin ☹️ So I have the chance for two other splices.

 

The two window are out now and the new ones more or les ready. They have to dry properly, and then I will give them a thin coat of clear lacquer. So that the glas would't look too plain. I worked this time a little more accurate and it looked much better.

 

I made the windows for the Dragon from mica. So I know, it is not easy to work with it. But it is clear and plain. And I know also glas from the 18th century. It's not so plain like the glas today, but it is not blind. From looking trough it, you could get sea sick. I think, the mica at the contemporary models are also coated with glue ore lacquer and over the last 200 years it is getting blind and wavy.

 

This is the 60 gunner 1:60 I saw in Chatham. And that at that scale! So tomorrow more about windows, I hope.

745620138_Bildschirmfoto2021-12-21um15_57_57.thumb.jpg.30f166a89d52bdf6d4f04341ad1c5aec.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

Siggi, the windows look great. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. 

Current Builds:  1870's Sternwheeler, Lula

                             Wood Hull Screw Frigate USS Tennessee

                             Decorative Carrack Warship Restoration, the Amelia

 

Completed: 1880s Floating Steam Donkey Pile Driver                       

                       Early Swift 1805 Model Restoration

 

 

Posted
On 22/12/2021 at 13:36, Siggi52 said:

Hola,

ya está hecho, las ventanas están listas y empotradas. La laca en los cristales acrílicos puede secarse un poco más y luego espero que se vean un poco más uniformes.

DSC01830.thumb.jpg.cfd2ff3d2464d68354eb90be1f4a71b3.jpg

 

DSC01835.thumb.jpg.558b344f7efb8ec2a1debaf19e25c0e1.jpg

 

DSC01832.thumb.jpg.e477f243ec624cd6bbb658183e391fcc.jpg

 

1751596264_Weihnachtenenglisch.thumb.jpg.1c56dd15a705eea378c60aa1bfec8c4c.jpg

Merry Christmas teacher, a great job, one of the best I have seen. Congratulations to the entire crew.

 

-HMS Tritón 1/48 1773 en scracht (TERMINADO)

-HMS Winchelsea 1/35  1764 full scracht (EN PROYECTO)

 

notpirate.png

Posted

Hello, and thank you Albert

That was not for the first time, but when I look long enough at the pictures it is not unusual that I'm back in my shop and tear down what I had build before. So also here.  It is terrible what you could see all at pictures 😬  Now the window borders 2.0

At least I carved only these red and white half circles new, but I also build the pillars and painted them the last days.

 

DSC01851.jpg.fb2a2f967f11007262e38036651eff30.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

Hello,

it is done! That was more work as expected. The next, and for the next time last thing to do outside of the hull, would be to rig up the gun port lids at the gun deck. 

 

DSC01855.jpg.eb6310fb85832e16b06d4474e3b7eff1.jpg 

 

DSC01856.jpg.de84aee14c8dc75c3c3feb88136abc87.jpg

 

DSC01863.thumb.jpg.6c26a5fcde51ed1c54f2528863890109.jpg

 

DSC01868.thumb.jpg.186ef8e9273989fb148d8ed31aa53283.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted (edited)

Hi Siggi, again wonderful work, I’m just in awe over this model.

 

I just noticed in your last post that your aft FWD riding bit appears to potentially cover a portion of your FWD companionway. They reason why I ask is that I’m drafting Portland 1770 and I ran into this issues while utilizing the original drawings, I’m curious to know if you encounter this on Tiger and if so, do you move the bit or leave as designed? 

 

below is your model and the bitt appears to cover the companionway
 

19A4FDA8-3207-49B1-927C-292FF273EC2F.jpeg.ad86e04c9eeadbf2b4620f1fce238695.jpeg
 

below you can see my 3D model of the bitt in question on Portland as well as the original draft also showing the error:

 

F86DD384-568F-42DB-994A-2D0F8302F229.jpeg

8330B470-49A9-4B9A-8FA2-DF9B5F85DB8F.jpeg
 

JJ

Edited by scrubbyj427

Current Builds: HMS Winchelsea 1764 1:48 - 5th rate 32 gun frigate (on hold for now)

 

                         HMS Portland 1770 Prototype 1:48 - 4th rate 50 gun ship

 

Posted

Hello JJ,

I leave it so as it was designed. I don't think that it is a mistake. You find that at many plans. 

Here the Tiger 1747

906151387_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_10_53.jpg.2498063f0feede75f2cf4af90ea565df.jpg

 

Standard 1782

217394845_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_15_46.jpg.96651f0471db4e4da5b5ffd0ff6d7149.jpg

 

Dragon 1760

2087765961_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_25_06.jpg.8fcbcbe69b36701ddb8c2d09a164e54a.jpg

 

Or even not

Essex 1741

939311769_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_17_56.jpg.1366601c8ee67f34110128e4b06c247f.jpg

 

Ipswich 1730

689734997_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_18_42.jpg.5c482508992aebf51719915c543e1427.jpg

 

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted
3 hours ago, Siggi52 said:

Hello JJ,

I leave it so as it was designed. I don't think that it is a mistake. You find that at many plans. 

Here the Tiger 1747

906151387_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_10_53.jpg.2498063f0feede75f2cf4af90ea565df.jpg

 

Standard 1782

217394845_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_15_46.jpg.96651f0471db4e4da5b5ffd0ff6d7149.jpg

 

Dragon 1760

2087765961_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_25_06.jpg.8fcbcbe69b36701ddb8c2d09a164e54a.jpg

 

Or even not

Essex 1741

939311769_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_17_56.jpg.1366601c8ee67f34110128e4b06c247f.jpg

 

Ipswich 1730

689734997_Bildschirmfoto2022-01-05um09_18_42.jpg.5c482508992aebf51719915c543e1427.jpg

 

 

 

Hi Siggi, very interesting to see that so prevalent in so many designs. Wonder why they intended to obstruct a decent portion of the opening? Weird. I’ll just leave it as is then!

 

JJ

Current Builds: HMS Winchelsea 1764 1:48 - 5th rate 32 gun frigate (on hold for now)

 

                         HMS Portland 1770 Prototype 1:48 - 4th rate 50 gun ship

 

Posted

Hello,

so, the deck is scrubbed and I made a first sample sitting for the cannons. The question is here, should they be perpendicular with the axis of the ship (pic.1), or with the outside of the walls? (pic.2) I tend for the later variation. You could see both at the contemporary models.

And JJ, the shipwright stands before the ladder way. So it is't so tight.

 

DSC01871.thumb.jpg.a0d517dad985b7c3a148849b9161e039.jpg

 

DSC01872.thumb.jpg.24a4c116b2fbc1d46a4aa656e6076192.jpg

 

DSC01875.thumb.jpg.241e9944879e4cfff7e1ef51b78e22c3.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Posted

That clearance looks close to what I have, about 18-20” at 1/48 scale. 
I also like the guns arranged as you have them in the second photo, but I’m also curious as to how they were actually set on the real ship. Looks really good though.

JJ

Current Builds: HMS Winchelsea 1764 1:48 - 5th rate 32 gun frigate (on hold for now)

 

                         HMS Portland 1770 Prototype 1:48 - 4th rate 50 gun ship

 

Posted

Hello,

today I puzzled how to lay out the anchor cable at the deck. First, must a cable when not in use go over the bits? I build that at the port side. At the starboard side I would say, the anchor is out and the cable goes over one bit. Falconer says, only at a heavy sea the second bit was also in use and more stoppers. I secured the cables with two stoppers. All is not hard and fast, so if someone of you have other suggestions, please let me know. At least, most of this you would't see later 😐

 

I had some trouble with the uploading of two pictures! That is the reason, why one picture is now smaller. 

DSC01877.jpg.bc9e1eaeecf11eebf57cd5469ef2b1bc.jpg

 

DSC01876.thumb.jpg.3f9a403e807316c85ab8ede6fdb5d4fb.jpg

 

DSC01879.thumb.jpg.4685b82273b151f1c6fcca093b1791aa.jpg

 

DSC01878.thumb.jpg.69cdc2ef5f7908caf4592d0a63a5c13e.jpg

Regards,

Siggi

 

Recent build: HMS Tiger (1747)

Captains Barge ca. 1760, scratch build
HMS Dragon 74 gunner 1760, scratch build

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...