Snug Harbor Johnny

Steven, Your Great Harry (in my opinion) ranks as one of most interesting builds on MSW - a fine job at a difficult scale (although there are some tiny marvels done by those with an 'elite' level of skill I can only dream about). My Henry project is on hold while I learn rigging skills on the Gorch Fock 1 restoration, but I intend to post drawings of the frame pieces on gridded stock for anyone wanting a 'starting point' to do GH.

After some practice, the technique for making the turnbuckles was improved - and cutting them from pre-browned tubing makes for a nicer fitting. They're still a tad large for units aloft, so I went back to a Hobby Lobby for more stock and found a smaller size to try. Some finer brass wire was also bought. The eyes are made from 1 1/2" lengths bent around a fine drill bit as a starting point. This is a method seen elsewhere on MSW, but I'm picturing it here. Step 2 is to clamp in a vise and twist with the drill (prior to trimming off the end bits after forming). Turning smaller turnbuckle bodies is at about the limit in small size doable with my rig due to springiness, but I suppose smaller belaying pins might be done from rod held close to the chuck and cut with a form tool. 26 gauge wire was used for the eyes (versus 22 gauge for the larger turnbuckles), because the through hole in the 1/16" O.D. tubing is smaller than the 3/32" O.D. tubing. Below is the first trial part next to the larger version for comparison. Yeah, I'm still 'in the weeds' but plodding on with the prep work. In the photo below, the top group of turnbuckles are the 'learning batch' ... perhaps OK, but I might re-make them to appear uniform with the improved method batch near the bottom. On the lower right are the first pair of thinner fittings next to the larger size to be used to anchor the lower shrouds.

You're doing fine ... take all the time you need, which is my own style. I have an early, well-molded version of this kit up on the shelf for some future time (or perhaps to end-up with someone else when I'm gone), and have long thought on what eventual approach could be done with it. The Czech-made laser-engraved wooden deck topper was added to the box, as I've never been happy trying to paint plastic to look like wood - yet some have done pretty well doing just that. And starting with an unbuilt kit does not have the limitations imposed on restoring a previously built model, as you are doing.

We've has some splendid weather of late (for August ... I feel sympathy for parts of the country plagued by fire, floods and earthquake - disasters of 'Biblical' proportions), that I've been working a lot outside when not working at the hospital. But the Gorch Fock I (GF1) is still on my mind. A nice photo was found with the crew standing on the yards for show ... brave and steady men. 'Don't know what the signal flags say given that the photo is B&W, German signal flags may differ from other nationalities, and the message would be in German. I can make out the Nazi flags atop the masts. So I looked some to find out more about the ship's namesake, Gorch Fock (a pen name, fock translating as 'jib'). 'Seems he was a playwright and poet who got swept up into WWI, as so many men did to their peril. So many artists, writers, teachers, scientists and men from all walks of life never made it home in that conflict ... and no one knew that even greater devastation lay further in the future. He appears to have been stoic about his conscription, and was steadfast in duty to the end, as were many of all nations involved. Ergo he must have been thought as an example of patriotism, as most nations honor those who die in service. I had a look at just two of his poems and did my own translation of them ... relying on what I can remember from HS and Collegiate (intermediate) German, plus a glossary. Much poetry (in my opinion the best poetry) has both meter and rhyme, and this makes literal translation tricky to do in order to give as much of the 'feeling' of the original into another language. So I gave my best shot. Segle, Hertz, mit allen Winden, Sail on, my heart, with every Wind, wirst nicht deinen Hafen finden. hope not your safe harbor to find. Hafen? Was soll dir der Hafen? Harbor? What harbor's meant to keep? Legst dich nur him zum Schlafen ! Just lay you down and go to sleep ! Segle, Hertz, mit allen Winden. Sail on, my heart, with every Wind. Das erste Kriegergrab am Wegesrand, At a soldier's grave by the road so grand, wir stehen mit der Mussen in der Hand. we stand with our kit and our hats in hand. Ob Freund, ob Feind der Tote, der da liegt, Whether friend or foe, he's dead where he lies, ein Blumenstrauss doch auf den Hugel fliegt. while a flower row up the hillside flies. Im Westen glimmt ein tiefes Abendrot; Off to the West glows a deepening red; wir grussen ernst und feirlich den Tod ! we earnestly, solemnly greet the dead ! Dann heult der Zug und es geht Russlandwarts ... The wailing train will to Russia depart ... Bleibst wie du warst, bleibst tapfer, du mein Herz ! Stay as you were, and be strong, oh my heart !

This is a nifty model and yours looks great. I suppose anyone who reads the available MSW builds will note the few challenging spots and be advised of remedial steps before going too far on the project. You are right that the guns look proper now, and sanding a bit of the bottom of the carriages is an effective 'slight of hand' that is virtually invisible on the finished model. I suppose that someone just starting out might 'lower' the level of the deck a tad by trimming the top of the bulkhead forms that the deck will be mounted on - or the needed allowance could be "split" between trimming the deck forms and building the bulwarks slightly higher (thus raising the gun ports just a tad).

The photos you show of various steps are clear and instructive. Thank you. I can see now how drilling fairleads nearer to the lubber hole of the main top will assure that control lines from above will pass behind the point where the main shrouds (heading toward to the lubber hole) cross the lines from the lower deadeyes on the periphery of the top as they head down to the mast below. That way the route up the ratlines will be free of any other lines that might get in the way.

A picture can be worth many (if not a thousand) words ... so a view of your components could be facilitative.

Once more, some pictures new to me ... ferreting out "Getty" branded images (or any others that really are in the public domain - due to prior publication under the old laws - but have been since "copyrighted" by various organizations in possession of them). I have a collection of 'turn of the 20th century' post cards (most of them printed overseas, often Germany) with no copyright information on them (being ephemera at the time) - ergo they were public domain from the moment they hit the streets. YET, I'm seeing the same images on various internet sites where the holder has 'slapped' a so-called 'common law' copyright on the image ... hmmmm, perhaps they imagine that whatever spots, postmarks, folds, tears, etc. make them unique and fair game to anyone who wants to try and claim them as theirs. Yup, I've seen multiples of the same postcard in multiple sites ALL 'claiming' ownership. Not to worry, all one has to do is Photoshop out blemishes, foxing, postmarks, etc. and you have then created your own 'new' image ... and no would-be hoarder can lay claim to it.

'Chicken v/s Egg'? Chickens are birds, and birds are the living descendants of dinosaurs - ergo dinosaurs existed before birds. Dinosaurs laid eggs, ergo the Egg came before the chicken. Of course chicken tenders and McNuggets have egg in the batter that surrounds them ...

There's a Gorch Fock in one display case there ... something I'm attempting to restore - estimated age 50 - 70 years.

I've chauffeured the Admiral to another gem and bead show, and continued to scout out any possible fittings or findings while I was there. Some nice eyes with long shanks were found - to be used as deck eyes that can be pushed far enough into the deck of the solid hull (after pre-drilling slightly undersized holes) so that the tension will be enough to prevent pulling out under the slight tension that might be exerted by new rigging. I looked for what are referred to as 'bar spacers' to use as turnbuckles (as making them one by one is time consuming ... but then is there a shortage of time - other than waiting for the last call to sea?). Nothing was found, and an on-line search (including Fire Mountain - a major supplier) did not turn up anything suitable that was not gold-filled, ergo $$$. So I'm sticking with my present fabrication plan. Completely darkened turnbuckles caused the fine diameter differences turned on them to mostly 'disappear', given the small size and scale. So a small file was used to remove the color from between the collars meant to represent where a spanner would be placed during tension adjustment of a shroud. Uncolored assemblies were colored with fine paint applicators with the reagents in order, and that did darken the bands of those pieces. I happen to like this look better, so when more are turned from pre-darkened tube - the collars will remain dark and the minor diameters will have fresh brass exposed. The turnbuckles might just be painted white, as railings can also be painted white, but as said before, I like the look of brass (which will age gradually and get a patina) and paint often 'gunks up' fine details. A photo of some assemblies is below ... only 74 more to go !

Nice staining job. I've used Minwax for a long time, and even the relatively new 'reformulated' version (lower VOCs) gives about the same result. To lessen 'over absorption' (as the grain changes - especially end grain). I've often applied a light amount of colorless pre-stain wood 'conditioner'. This lets the wood 'drink up' some vehicle so that light application of the colored stain goes on without over-coloring. One can always go over the wood again after some drying to darken, but once over-stained you can't lighten it except (perhaps) by sanding. Your rope looks good, and will further enhance your model. Thanks, so much for the great photos and diagrams of the 'Polar' decking. THIS is just the sort of information I've been hoping to see at some point, and will definitely influence anything I do in future on this ship. Also, that's a GREAT capstan ... and I wonder if the maker would be willing to sell some to members of the 'Endurance club'. So far, I've assembled some of the items that might be considered a 'kit enhancement' set that include things like brass 3D stanchions, a two-bladed prop, tiny jackstay eyelets, home-made rope (can always be bought), better deadeyes (of scale size out of walnut), etc.

As the soldier hiding behing a plant said on the TV show 'Laugh-in' ... Veeeeery interesting ....

I realized that my single point cutting tool (mostly what I've used on brass and aluminum - but a few things in mild steel) was likely dulled, and an examination with a 16x loupe confirmed this. The flat faces were lapped with a little water against a finishing stone and looked at with every few strokes. This improved the point considerably. The point was also a little below 'center' with the length it was extended to, so a brass shim easily corrected this. The result was better cutting (duh). Fooling around with gel CA was redundant because A.) a light lubricant applied to the supporting drill left contaminated (dark) oil inside the workpieces, which had to be cleaned out with a miniature swab before any glue would stick B.) some Ca would still squeeze out during crimping and have to be removed once cured C.) 'Getting the hang' of crimping followed by a pull test using a pin through each eye and pulling well more than a shroud could exert proved that properly crimped eyes in the turnbuckle bodies will not fail ... due to proof testing each one. D.) any glue residue makes it more difficult to darken the brass, unless painting is chosen. The next consideration was how to darken the brass ... and there have been various discussions on how to do this elsewhere in MWS. Some methods take a relatively long exposure, and I thought I'd like to find something with 'quick results'. After fooling around (like some alchemist not knowing what to do) with a variety of things on hand, I stumbled upon something that is good enough for me. There were two agents that were tried separately, with no apparent effects - not even when looked at the next day. But applying one first with the corner of a rag moistened by the agent (wearing disposable nitrile gloves, of course) - then applying the corner of a second rag treated with the second agent ... an immediate chemical 'browning' occurred. I'd liken this to something made of shiny brass that was allowed to slowly take on a brown patina through oxidation - and that can take a long time to occur naturally. The first agent is known as 'Livers of Sulphur', and is used by jewelers, so I suppose can be found on-line. I happened to buy a small plastic bottle of it at a gunsmith shop specializing in 'old time' gunsmithing ... Pennsylvania long rifles, as hunting is a popular sport during an exclusive black powder season in PA, where there are extensive state gamelands set aside for hunters. A description is pasted below: Note they say it does not want to work on brass, which I can confirm by trying it alone. But the second agent is an 'instant' gun blue - also bought at the same gun shop, but is generally common to many gun shops as factory bluing may need re-touching due to abrasion or rust spotting due to delayed or incomplete cleaning after use on the range. Birchwood-Casey is a common brand name, but there are others similarly formulated with phosphoric acid, cupric sulfate and selenious acid ... note that extensive direct contact can result in the absorption of selenium, toxic in excess of the trace amounts found in foods and vitamin supplements (so wear gloves ... but it is swallowing the stuff that can be fatal, duh). Both agents can irritate skin due to acid content, but the nitrile gloves are more than adequate protection, and there were no fumes that I could detect. So rubbing with liver of sulphur (sparingly), then with the instant gun blue produced a quick browning of the brass. The photo below was on the brass tubing stock I'm using to turn the turnbuckle bodies, and the flash of the camera makes the visual comparison less clear, but the untreated tube is bright brass versus a nice brown patinated tube - like one lying around a few years. Below are the few assemblies I've made (not many really, and I'm working on making better eyes and cutting better bodies), all but one of which had CA applied (an unnecessary step per my above comments) before or after assembly ... the ones on the right are patinated while the three on the left are not (for comparison). The one in the center was the last one made and NOT glued ... it seems to have browned the best. The eyes are made of jewelry/beading wire, and must be coated to keep the wire bright over time. I'll have to see if there is a solvent that will take the coating off ... or I'll simply leave them as they are, since a little brass can 'pimp' the model. Actually I've no objection of using brass on a ship model, as those items will eventually get a natural toning.

This seems to be a 'rabbit hole' you're peering down, at least from the content of one article that turned up on a casual search: https://alkony.enerla.net/english/the-nexus/miniatures-nexus/miniature-hobby/miniature-size-miniature-scale Last year I build a 1:72 Khufu Solar Barge and had searched for that scale ... and there were not many offerings for ancient Egyptians, but I did find one box that was suitable. A temporarily suspended build of the Great Harry happens to be aprox. 1:88, and 1:87 is nominally HO train gauge. So I looked for 'medieval' sailors in that gauge - again the pickings were sparse (there were a few military figures that might work for medieval soldiers carried on board). So if you are sure of the ship model scale you are (or will be ) making (e.g. 1:48), then it may do to search for that scale and see what comes up.

As posted way back a year and a half ago, I test-folded a mock paper sail 'clewed to quarters' as it could then be bunched up to the top of a yard - just to see if 'dog (or mouse) ears' could then hand near the ends of the yard. Now the paper did get thick with all the folding (as opposed to the remarkable thinness of canvas on an actual ship), so a section was cut out of the pre-folded paper to reduce thickness somewhat - then refolded. Sure enough, I thought the result looked OK (the ears could even be smaller and twisted a little to make them look thinner). So can this be a case where one can have the cake and eat it too? That is, one can clew to quarters and still have the ears on the furled sails hanging near the yard ends by pulling the clew outward during the folding process (ergo the clew line would have to be loosened). My test photos follow: Men standing on the foot ropes would pull sections of sail up the front in sequence. The yard below was flipped to the front side.

Today (my only day off from hospital service this week) my order from Ages of Sail finally arrived ... since the parts needed for the restoration (plus a couple other items) just topped $150, they shipped for free ... But the lowest price (for the shipper) FedEx ground coast-to-coast did take longer (9 days) than if I'd paid extra for expedited service. Since I wasn't in a rush, that didn't matter, but if you need something in a hurry, then by all means pay to save time. The first picture show the 80 3-hole stanchions ordered to replace the crude nails used on the model (likely what was available at the time). They are the right size for 1:100. There are a pair of binnacles and modern anchors, but I'll use only one of each. The modern anchor goes on the starboard side against the hull (fully retracted). Its alway 'like Christmas' when a shipment like this arrives. Next up are some ladders, two sizes of boats - life boats to be stored forward, and two smaller boats for the aft davits. There's and old-fashioned anchor to go in the deck area allotted for stowage on the port side. The additional items include a 2-bladed prop for the Endurance eventually to be made (I plan on using the 4-bladed metal prop from that kit on the Gorch Fock), and the single hole stanchions (also for the Endurance) that I couldn't get earlier from another source. The aprox 1:70 scale of the OcCre kit means the 15mm stanchions represent about 41" high ... close enough. There were no 12mm available that would represent 33" and 10mm would have been too short. And yes, covered by the pack of ladders are three more turnbuckles made for the Gorch Fock - they are pictured separately below. I'm beginning to get a little practice with them, and made three in 1 hour. There is some variation in size, since I'm 'eyeballing' it at this scale - but not too much and I can always sort them so that the slightly shorter turnbuckles will be aloft, and everything at each level will look alike. With more practice they will look a little better, and I should be able to do about 4 an hour. 'Did another look and I'll need at least 74 altogether ... with some rejects (and breaks) that should take 20 some hours to do. Likely this will be spced out over a number of days.

Well mates, a detail very important to this project is how to handle the closed turnbuckles for the shrouds. The crude cast deadeyes in pot metal (common back in the day) don't jive with the original ship, but were likely what was available and practical when the model was built. A number of concepts were considered, concurrent with whatever else I've been doing (except when 'focusing' when special attention was needed). At last I tried to make a 'plan' with a sketch (pictured below), that might make sense to someone familiar with machining. Yeah, my first few attempts proved that theory and practice are often different things ... and the smallest brass tube easily available does not have enough wall thickness to machine per concept. The space available was tight to avoid excessive bending of the material (which did indeed bend some, so light multiple cuts were needed). The 'hex filing' (how a turnbuckle works, by twisting the body so the opposing RH and LH threads will either pull the ends inward together or outward) is just not practical with so little material on the tiny piece available ... but at 1:100 it doesn't have to be represented. Below is a photo of the lathe spinning ... the camera managed to 'freeze' the chuck, but the higher frequency vibrations on the workpiece make for a little blur. Simple cuts were made with just the tool seen. As planned, the model trail track saw cut through the brass tube and let the part slide on the drill - sown taken out of the tail stock below. Moved off the drill bit, you can see the small size in the palm of my hand. (A little out of focus - and I've been having mechanical/continuity problems with the Admiral's cast-off camera ... I may seek something better.) The next step is to make a couple eyes by twisting 22 gauge beading wire around the same drill used to support the brass tube in the lathe. Each eye was put into one end of the closed turnbuckle body. Crimping with the semi-circular opening of the bead working crimper didn't work out, and deformed the eye a bit - fixed with a fine awl. You can see that the next two crimping spots have a 'teat' on one side that proved to be far better to secure the other eye (also used on the first eye) without distortion. Below is the first successful turnbuckle made .. a little 'rough', but I forgot to apply a fine jeweler's file while still spinning on the lathe to even out the fine waves that are inevitable when machining (they also show more on a small part magnified by photography. In the corner of the picture, part of the one ring of power can be seen - at least it exerts power over me (We serves the Mistress of the precious). Now there are over 50 of these to make (plus some extras), so that will occupy me for a while ... goes with the hobby. The last picture in this post compares a fitting from the model with the type I plan on using in the restoration ... both about 1/2" OAL - a little out of scale, but I can't easily make turnbuckles any smaller (not that it is impossible, but I'll go ahead with what I have at hand). 'Feels good to have moved the ball a little further downfield.

'Like the look of individual gaskets tied with a reef knot done with a bight of rope - so it will hold just fine but can be loosed by tugging on the free end of the loop.

We're all free to build any configuration so desired. I like the look of the detailed steering gear that some have modeled, and don't forget, once ice-bound the shed over the gear was removed and put on the ice flow for storage. So a build with late modification without the shed is just fine. And the deep-sea photos of the ship as she rests do not show the shed. The book 'Endurance' (available in paperback) is a thrilling read and adds greatly to one's knowledge and appreciation of the expedition. There is also a 'boat in a bottle' build showing the Polar configuration with the extended Ritz with decking above. The "T" shaped roofing/dog run is gone (as seen in polar photos), and so are many of the stanchions/railings in that area. I'm with you on the Polar version simply because simplifies some of the build ... and I'm one for taking the path of least resistance. The 'rolling yard' seen on a recent build is intriguing ... and then that eliminates bunt and clew lines for that sail - another simplification. Looking forward to your build ! Johnny

You've chosen a great kit to build, and appear to have some good plans in mind. As for the 'configuration' of the vessel, that kept changing as they preparations for the expedition progressed. Thats why a set of random pictures of Shackleton's Endurance can be confusing. There is the way it looked after initial modifications in England - which appears to be about how the kit is set up (except that the steering gear was still exposed at that time - the wooden 'shed' to protect the steering gear from ice accumulation near the pole was added when more changes were made in South America). In South America more modifications/changes were made, including enlarging the Ritz (thus increasing the run-out of deck amid ships) ... one has to sort the available photos as to location and time to see what they did and when. Once on polar ice more changes were done, but they were stuck for good at that point. So there are easily three 'versions' than can be modeled, as changes were made in stages. Fair Sailing ! Johnny

'Tried using a 50-50 clear/amber shellac mix to test on some reef points per the previously posted 'straightening' method - since the pale threads seemed nearly invisible against the cleaned sail material. This was to see if I could eliminate a step, the first step being to tint the points with water color prior to using clear amber to tame the 'flyaway' nature of loose threads. I wasn't keen on the shortcut for a few reasons - so the tint first, then straighten with clear shellac method was settled on with a reasonably good result. The reef points are not really 'glued' to the sail (but the micro fibers do tend to adhere), and portions of each point (and some in their entirety) are free of the sail. Yet they remain relatively straight, but with slight bend in some - which seems 'natural' in that they are NOT strictly in rows like men at attention. It is better than a 'bad hair day' appearance for sure, which they had before. The topmost sail has no points. Looking closely, the method of reef point application appears to be passing a fine thread from the back (leaving a tail loose), passing the needle back through the sail a couple warp threads over and then back out the front through or near the original needle hole. No knot was needed, Now I'll have to dismount all remaining sails (keeping them in order with the yards from their respective masts), clean then treat the points. I've ordered appropriate three-hole stanchions for better railings from Age of Sail, as well as lifeboats, a prop and two types of anchors - plus a few odds and ends. I saw an interesting picture recently, so I'm attaching it to this below:

Thanks for catching my typo ... the spell Czech does not catch a goof spelled correctly (or suggests something odd for a typo it DOES find). Were the scale really 1:72 the model would be over 4 feet ! The actual kit scale of 1:162 is just a tad smaller than the one you are building - and nicely done at that. The edit to my original post is pasted below: Edit of 8-3-23 OOPS !! My typo on the kit scales. I confused the scale of two "other" paired kits (1:172, and typed that as 1:72 - amazing what missing a digit can do). The hulls on the Scientific and Lindbergh kits measure 21". When compared to a 285' long original Robert E. Lee, it works out to about 1:162. The Lindbergh box states 1:163 (close enough) while the Scientific box states 1/8" = 1.45' ... My guess is that the 'resultant' model size of about 24.5" represents the hull PLUS extended ramps sticking out in front (OAL). The plastic hull shell and the wooden hull blank from the respective kits match each other almost perfectly, as do all the detailed parts.

Your though about 'steps' mirrors Thomas Edison's comments that beginning a project is like facing a very long staircase and one can't really see the top of it. But you start, one step at a time, and after a while you're somewhere in the middle of that long staircase where the top and the bottom both look far away. But you keep on climbing, focusing on the next step, and the after a while you can see the top getting nearer and nearer until you finally reach the last step. And then its just one small step that gets you to the top, and that last step doesn't seem so hard, as did every individual step on the way up. Yet, at last, you've made it and don't have to look back down the stairway finally ascended. Congratulations on your super-nice model ! Johnny

'Very busy this time of year - especially with some breaks in the heat for outside work. Yet there is opportunity to think about the project at hand while doing all sorts of other things. Guess the idea is to 'measure twice, cut once'. Considerations include: 1.) Re-thinking walnut blocks. I've always liked walnut, and for deadeyes they seem pretty good as-is. But they appear too dark for blocks to my eye, and lighter colored wood may be preferable. Now late-period clippers had internally stropped blocks for the most part, so wrapping wood blocks with line makes me scratch my head. Rob made good used of molded Cutty (1:96 kit) blocks on models he's made - yet even so they appear somewhat out of scale, strictly speaking. 2.) The scale issue. As mentioned elsewhere, a 6" block would be about 1.5mm at 1:100, and 8" block would be about 2mm and a 10" deadeye would be about 2.5mm ... all pretty small stuff for fingers that just don't want to work things that small (like mine). Obviously, going larger can help - but that can only go so far until the blocks really DO look overly large. So an idea covering two of the above came to me as I escorted the Admiral at a bead and polished stone show recently ... that is Czech demi-round glass beads in a flat, coppery-brown color - which I found at the show. In the photo below are the three sizes I bought to try: #11, roughly corresponding to a 2mm (8") block t 1:100 - meant to serve for my representations of 6" single blocks (bunt or others); #8, about 3mm or about a 12" block at the above scale - meant to serve as a nominal 8" - 10" block (single or double); and #6, about 16" at scale, meant to serve as a nominal 12" triple block where applicable. These seem to be the available sizes (no #7s or 10s), and the color could be a little lighter - but one must use the tools one has. For a simple block with no becket, I'll put a line through the bead and tie a 'hangman's noose (which nicely pulls one end of the line into the 'shank' of the noose) - then pull the noose tight on the bead block. Where a line would go from a becket, another noose is made opposite the first - simple. In some cases thin copper or black finished copper wire might be just twisted after passing through a bead (with one end trimmed close to the twist) - also simple, so it satisfies the KISS rule (Keep It Simple, Stupid). I see now the advantages of working in 1:70 scale - and even better at 1:48. Then it is much easier to use 'real wood blocks'. Now there are some highly skilled practitioners who can do amazing feats of miniaturization - and I doff my hat to them (and am tempted to build a small shrine to do homage). I'll always be glad to see truly fine work (and there is plenty of examples found on MSW), but as for me - I'm mainly trying to learn and appreciate bygone era while making something now and then at a skill level I can manage. The Gorch Fock has turnbuckles instead of laced deadeyes, yet the little fittings used on the model at hand represent (sort of) deadeyes. I found something called a 'bar' for beadwork, but it may be too large (6 scale feet) as shown below. I'm considering tying beads through a short length of thin brass tube to represent aprox. 3' turnbuckles. 3.) I'd like most of what I do on the GF to be 'reversible', for someday additional maintenance or repair might be needed. This might be compared to making work done on 'Old Masters' reversible by future conservators. Hence means of pinning, tying and wrapping should be preferred over outright gluing. As already mentioned, I'm fortunate that the masts will come right out of the solid hull, simplifying life considerably. 4.) There are no 'instructions' per-se that go along with this project - hence I'm constantly thinking things out in two ways. he first is how to accomplish what I'm planning to do step-by-step clearly in mind before doing anything. The 'other' way of thinking has me imagining I'm a 'scaled down' man who has to climb aloft to do all the functions a sailor might have to do. Can I get everywhere I need to go? Are the handholds and foot ropes appropriate. How will the lines run, and can they be managed at deck level for the intended task? The quality of instructions, detail and order of operations that go with model kits is critical for those learning the art of ship modeling. What is provided by various kits (both old and new) is highly variable in quality and accuracy. That is why the various builds found in MSW are an invaluable aid to those not expert in the craft (like old Johnny). There will be both simplifications and enhancements on this restoration, to be sure, but I think the result will be rewarding.