Jump to content

Old Collingwood

Members
  • Posts

    11,637
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Old Collingwood

  1. 23 minutes ago, CDW said:

    Is it just a matter of the shape of the cone or are the spinners too short? If it's just the shape of the cone, you should be able to reshape them somewhat more like the originals. you'll just have to take care not to file away too much material. If they are too short, it is a different problem/solution, and they will need to be built out with putty or something similar perhaps. 

    They are the right circumference  just not quite pointed enough  they  are kind of like a ball shape.

     

    OC.

     

  2. HI all,

     

    I had a battle on today  - trying to manipulate the engine/undercarriage nacelle to fit the wing (its a notorious  bad fit)   I had to dry fit - dry fit  - dry fit  etc etc etc  and  file/sand away  till I managed to get it to fit requiring just the smallest amount of filling.

    Firstly I glued the front end  and aided by the hairdryer  and some gentle pressure it  glued down, then I pushed down the back end and secured with a seam of fine glue.

    The idea with the hairdryer  is to make the glue mimick  a heat gun  by where the glue sets quicker by being hot, and cools quickly as set.

     

    OC.

    IMG_0216.JPG

    IMG_0215.JPG

  3. 1 minute ago, CDW said:

    I have no experience with it whatsoever.

    I know as much knowledge about Airbrushes  as I do  Knitting  - never ever  picked one up or used one, it took me  fifty odd years to even use a Rattle can, everything else till now has been painted using  brushes  including  1/144  scale airliner kits  like B747s.

     

    OC.

  4. Good day all,   more work on mossie,  -  I  assembled the other wing  starting by fitting the flaps together, at  the same time I painted and placed the wing radiator in place,  then after cleaning the seams up - the wing was  joined together with the flaps trapped inside.

    I also cleaned up and painted both engine nacelles.

     

    OC.

    IMG_0213.JPG

    IMG_0214.JPG

  5. 1 minute ago, mtaylor said:

    It wasn't a 707. And it wasn't empty.  <sigh>  I've had it wrong all these years...bad story tellers... bad!   It was DC8 with a load of passengers.  And they didn't have to gut the plane.    Here's a link with a video...

    https://thelexicans.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/dc8-crew-confused-3200-runway-at-marble-mountain-with-danang-runway/

     

    <hangs head> <goes and stands in the corner> <wonders why he listened to his fellow Marines>

    Very similar 707/DC8   esp  if they were the short body DC8   later on  they  lengthen'd  them to near 180feet,   the 707  was still a heavy-er plane though compared to the shorter DC8.

     

    OC.

×
×
  • Create New...