Jump to content

ccoyle

Moderators
  • Posts

    10,173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ccoyle

  1. 8 hours ago, Jackson7 said:

    It turns out the rudder directions are total nonsense. The 1-to-1 scale pieces are nowhere near 1-to-1. The kit calls for a 4x4mm piece when the three is the only one that fits. And to top it off, one of the hinges is broken. 

     

    I built Corel's Flying Fish. The list of problems with that kit could fill several large volumes. 😑

  2. 5 hours ago, AJohnson said:

    That looks very neat Chris.

     

    Thank you! Pre-molded canopies are certainly convenient, but I don't think I've ever had one yet that didn't pose its own unique challenges, and this one was no different, so I'm happy with this result.

     

    Next it was on to the ailerons, and naturally with this being a Halinski kit, each one had to consist of no less than thirteen separate parts. 😑 

    image.jpeg.8ea8c8461c821d5cb940826b26ac6714.jpeg

     

    In the end, though, I was completely dissatisfied with how the control horns turned out, so I ended up replacing them with much simplified scratch components, which knocked the parts count down to only twelve per side. As seems to be my habit, I also ended up with the gap between the wing and aileron being much more noticeable on one side than the other, which you can't really see from this angle. What can I say? And lastly for this session, I also added the brass 20 mm cannon barrels and their shrouds.

    image.thumb.jpeg.0a228c3594e1a5ecfe603a08ad5e0ba9.jpeg

     

    I believe the landing gear are next if I follow the numbered sequence.

     

  3. Hi, Dan, and welcome to MSW!

     

    Some observations (and you're probably not going to like the first one):

     

    • "Established kit" is a very generous description of any Mini Mamoli product. I think most of our members would agree with me when I suggest that these are terrible beginner kits -- poor materials, poor instructions, poor representations of the real-life subjects, and scales that are difficult to work in for wooden ship subjects. To be frank, I'd recommend setting this kit aside and starting over with something that is much more likely to result in success. You'd enjoy the hobby far more by going that route, IMO.
    • I can't for the life of me imagine why the kit would have you attach shrouds to the inboard side of the bulwark. That doesn't mimic actual practice at all.
    • A modeler is never obligated to rigidly follow instructions. Thinking the various tasks through in advance may suggest to you better ways to get a task completed.
    • Modelers use a variety of tools to work in tight spaces, including various styles of tweezers (including some with curved tips), hemostats, and assorted rigging tools that can often be home-made on the cheap.
    • Yes, attaching rigging to eyebolts before gluing the eyebolts in is one way of doing things, but it's a terrible way for doing shrouds -- because that method exists only in the minds of Mini Mamoli kit designers, not in actual practice.

    Anyways, just something to think about.

  4. Got the frames cut out and glued to the vacuformed canopy. Afterwards I noticed that there is a slight defect on the aft starboard side that didn't allow the lowest frame on that side to sit level. It remains to be seen how that will affect fitting the canopy to the fuselage later. I will let the glue fully cure before cutting the canopy free from its blank.

    image.jpeg.730f45238c09b8bcb5b26b376f2ca1c6.jpeg

     

    Since I invested in an upgraded cockpit interior, I'm leaning toward displaying this model with the canopy open.

  5. That's a tough diagnosis, Marcus, and I'm with Patrick on wishing you strength for the challenges to come. But I think I would not be alone in hoping that you would seriously reconsider the 'Viking funeral' plan for your model. Certainly someone in your family would appreciate having it, even if it is not completed? Might even be the kind of project someone would be willing to finish up for your family.

  6. We used to have more detailed instructions, including directions on how to append the medium (wood is the default medium) to the end of the title, but it made little or no difference in the number of titles that we ended up tidying. I'm happy if new members get their titles 75% 'correct'. As you pointed out, looking at existing log titles is the best way to see how it's done.

×
×
  • Create New...