Jump to content

druxey

NRG Member
  • Posts

    13,098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by druxey

  1. A windlass of about 1815 on a small vessel would be worked by short capstan-style bars called normans. It would look like the one Chuck Passaro sells on the Syren Ship Model Company's site.
  2. I've not come across any contemporary descriptions, I'm afraid. Perhaps someone else has?
  3. Very nice metalwork, Mick. If you are looking at another lathe, I've found a watchmakers' lathe with compound cross-slide excellent for model work. One can find them, often in very good condition, on eBay.
  4. I suspect that there was a small ringbolt inside. You could reach through and grab it to close the scuttle. A small rod of wood could then be passed through the ring to keep the scuttle closed.
  5. Yup, primer will show up everything! Fortunately, in this case a bit of automotive filler and sanding will see you right. I'd use caulking at the plank/stem joint, though.
  6. You haven't been idle, have you, Mobbsie? The new suit of sails looks terrific.
  7. The sides and sills of the timbers should match the quarter badge opening on the sheer draught.
  8. The sides of the opening should probably be parallel to each other, Ben.
  9. Have you annealed the brass before attempting to cut it?
  10. With due respect to the model sailmakers out there: any stitching at scales under about 1:6 looks way over-size, as Wefalck has said.
  11. Ah, type yclept Gothic blackletter. Haue fun!
  12. If you are going to use the existing piece, wet it thoroughly on top before gluing and adding rubber bands.
  13. If you are referring to the Vancouver expedition, Discovery was as depicted here (From the RMG collection). She was similar to a naval sixth rate, but with a merchant ship body. (The cross-section would have been fuller and the bow much bluffer.) If you aren't too fussy, I suppose a kit of Fly, a Swan class ship might be adapted to resemble her. (For those interested, the drawing shows ventilation scuttles on the lower deck: a detail usually omitted from official draughts.)
  14. Re- re- re-working? Sounds familiar! Instances of down-stream impact: positions of timberheads, placement of scuppers, positions of chain bolts....
  15. I suspect this is better planned out ahead, Alan. At least, that's been my experience. The moment you change one element it impacts many others, a kind of domino effect!
  16. That information is much more helpful! Illustrated below is very much like what her appearance would have been. The plan shows a slightly later and larger ship, after conversion in the navy. Take away all those gun ports and the barricades along the upper deck, replacing them with open rails, and you will have a pretty good idea of what your Princess Royal looked like. (This drawing is from the Royal Museums Greenwich collection, reproduced under the Creative Commons licence.)
  17. Alan: you need to study contemporary 'disposition of frame' draughts. You will see that toptimbers are either 'shifted' or 'cast' to form the edges of the ports. Cutting into the toptimbers to frame the ports was not allowed, as it would weaken the structure.
  18. Meade, Mark? More likely Porter, Stout, Sack or Gin. Of course, many contemporary models were not shown with armament. I think we can guess why!
  19. Hi, Wayne. I was actually given a copy of this Occasional Publication No. 6 last month by a fellow modelmaker. He was dispersing the contents of a deceased model maker's workshop and knew I had an interest in "that early stuff". I'd never come across a copy before and was working my way through the text yesterday.
  20. I see that no-one has replied to your query in over a month, Holleia. The probable reason is that these weekly publication models were begun by many, but most (if not all) subscribers dropped out after a short while. I doubt if anyone lasted the whole 100 weeks and, if they did, they probably wanted to keep the completed model.
×
×
  • Create New...