Jump to content

mikegr

Members
  • Posts

    585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mikegr

  1. The progress in 3d is going on. I put all things together as a preview although I will print the cranes in separate pieces.

    IMG-20220725-WA0000.jpg.4dc5c3bb0aed14ffa5e597fad50958ea.jpg

    However it seems that i prefer spend time on this and avoid to concentrate on a more challenging project. To built the deck frame, present on all cargo ships of the time instead of rail bars

    Cap_San_Diego-falszburta.jpg.e13649f5b0438cb8f96b6fd4dd1a11d6.jpg

    Because of the curvy shape that follows the hull, I'm not sure how to design it yet. And still I am worry about the overall fitting of the triangle supports to the deck. A last worry would be to find a glue for resin that won't also make a mess to the deck.
    For scratchbuild this piece I face the problem of finding the proper material. Metal strip would be too thin to handle and the tiny supports too hard to be made equally. The overall look of it may not look satisfying to my eyes.
    Balsa over 1mm would be more stable and still easy to work but too thick while thinner would be very optically ideal but easy to break unless fortified with some material like gel coat.

  2. On 7/8/2022 at 9:04 AM, RGL said:

    3D and PE are very different creatures, Flyhawk does great PE to a point but the complexity is somewhat a different level 

    I think Flyhawk produces the best plastic in the market, turrets, funnels, airplanes, all comes in great detail even in 1/700 scale, plus the PE

     

    Now for the 3D parts I found myself enjoying design and print my parts. I

    This may take more time than scratchbuilding but while increasing my design skills hopefully the overall time will be shorten. Results are satisfactory although there's always space for improvement

    IMG_20220707_173801.thumb.jpg.5c5b7eca25940610a6289d3753d8262b.jpgIMG_20220629_175506.thumb.jpg.e9dfdb02b2ecd378e0fef74190c48edf.jpgIMG_20220623_161345.thumb.jpg.03b401fa20dfd34b7be8203e996e46d2.jpg

  3. On 7/7/2022 at 4:09 AM, Old Collingwood said:

    If any of  you guys are  crossing the pond or even coming over to the Uk  - I deffo  suggest a day at the Tank Museum  its that good, Superb exhibits  a fantastic  shop  (where you can stock up on your tank models)  and a good  rest/food area  with  rest rooms.

     

    OC.

    i really hope one day to visit back London and tour the RAF Museum, HMS Belfast and the Naval Museum nearby.

  4. I done added some extra details. I also found out that I was rebuilding Hatsusimo not Amatsukaze as I thought. Therefore the mistake with the rear turret. 

    Back to the plan, second rear turret replaced again with AA gun.😁 Better concentrate on one ship each time.

    Added ladders,  doors and few other PE details. Then I sprayed photo etched primer. Now will finish up details by adding rails and prepare for final paint

    IMG_20220705_182840.thumb.jpg.fc1e692231a7aa3b347fb529f2feddd8.jpgIMG_20220705_183055.thumb.jpg.3cf1cd820fae7e8557be3a87447d672f.jpg

     

  5. 2 hours ago, lmagna said:

    Sometimes it is hard to detract or praise a design without raising the ire of the people who stand on the other side of the issue. But judging a design based on a single design fault or the ship's mystique, or factors that could not have been anticipated twenty or more years earlier or not using the same criteria across the board is also faulty reasoning and a disservice to the reader, especially the novice. Based on the reviews of this book it looks that possibly Anthony Preston may not have done his homework as meticulously as he could and should have. I could be wrong but in this case I will be skipping it so I will probably never know.

    It depends on the criteria used. If we take under consideration the purpose of built, then Bismarck was a disaster as her task to destroy enemy merchant vessels was never accomplished. Had the Germans used its steel to produce several dozens U boat instead, the war in the Atlantic may would have a different outcome.

    Same for Vanguard , that was built to fight in a war that finished too early for her.

    But if you consider the technology involved things may appear different.

    Bismarck was the Yamato of its time being the most armored ship ever created with 42% of its weight dedicated to armor.

    Vanguard built finally in 1946 was a state of the art ship with the most extended battle damage control.

  6. 20 minutes ago, lmagna said:

    With rifle butts attached to the sticks and bumper balls on the tips? :ph34r:

    Yes it is a bayonet fight variation, called Jukendo in fact

     

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jūkendō

     

    But my wonder is different.

    Are these big kits really complete?

    Or extra PE are required to get the most details out of them?

  7. 12 hours ago, Roger Pellett said:

    Lou,

     

    I have also read about the Japanese having to use raw crude oil as fuel.  This was a major factor in the loss of a carrier at the Battle of Philippine Sea.

     

    As it comes out of the ground, crude oil is a mixture of several organic compounds.  Some of these are light enough to vaporize at atmospheric pressure.  The refining process removes these light fractions which are sold as byproducts.  

     

    At Philippine Sea, a Japanese carrier was torpedoed by an American Submarine and a fuel bunker ruptured releasing these volatile fractions within the ship.  An ignition source touched them off and the resulting explosion caused the loss of the ship.

     

    Roger

    I have heard also about making alcohol from potato processing that was used to fly their training planes. 

     

    Not sure about the carrier you mentioned. Perhaps Taiho or Shinano.

    Both they were easily sunk but a single torpedo hit. This is caused also by lack of training in damage control. In contrast to American crews IJN sailors used to spend their training time on more traditional practices

    E5Tpt1aWYAA_-Z7.jpg.219931f1914a411bef9ed48e6f950235.jpg

  8.  So I did a bit of scratch built on AA platform. I replaced the frame with PE canvas style. I also added supports but look a bit long. Will be shorten in the other platform. I used brush hair for this.

    Guns were replaced. I have PEs but I'm not sure how they will look as they are quite thin. Maybe fit them on the other ship.

    IMG_20220627_220143.thumb.jpg.3c931a82939f657b19321c7ca9cd95e1.jpg

     

  9. On 6/15/2022 at 6:39 PM, ccoyle said:

    I'm acquainted with Super-Hobby but have never ordered from them. They carry card models and usually have a good number of photos of the actual kits, something that most retailers don't usually do. I hope you have a positive experience with them.

    I would rather worry about Aber itself than supper hobby.

    The 1/700 railings I bought was a joke, they could bent even with the touch of a brush.

    I expect in larger scales to be better. Got universal grills and other PE parts for larger scale, seemed ok.

  10. I checked drawingns and pictures of Amatsukaze only to find that mast is quite different. So I scratch built a new one using real 0.4 mm solid steel rods.

    A bit hard to cut but hold much better with CA glue comparing to brass maybe cause of less shiny surface. I added the secondary mast and a third 5" gun aft as seen also on box of kit but for a reason in plans there was a triple as gun instead which I replaced.

    Finally I added front funnel with some pipe details

    Amatsukaze_II.thumb.jpg.f3f964880a3cd6845a43d8bbfac8896c.jpgIMG_20220623_184648.thumb.jpg.470c90b749c0283030bb0f2fe1c071bf.jpg

     

  11.  First work was to drill portholes and funnel which were solid.

    I used a battery operated dremel tool to speed up work and 1 mm tape as a guide for straight line.

    It was a big problematic work as on high revs caused heat to melt the plastic and refill the hole! I have seen this in the past while cutting plexiglass with table saw, the temperature produced  caused the pieces to be soldered together.

    Also I found some torpedo tubes from my stash with decent appearance to replace the ones in the kits.

    IMG_20220609_190139.thumb.jpg.e845d1e8ae3afaf97168d6a435ee13df.jpgIMG_20220609_185918.thumb.jpg.3e64bf2a48010ff5dc924153a92e6628.jpg

  12. Italian shipbuilders where always paid attention to design and luxury. Even at warships and merchant ships. Not to mention their luxury passenger liners and yachts where they can fit a 3 bedroom house In a 10 meter hull. The food also is of high standard.

    Comparing to Japanese and other Asian built vessels, which are modern with high automatization standards but with less comforts and deticated space for crew.

×
×
  • Create New...