Jump to content

BANYAN

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR
  • Posts

    5,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BANYAN

  1. Great detail as usual Paul. Now mate, we do expect to see a highly detailed mouse or two and ship's cat also (or was the German Navy too efficient to allow mice to get aboard?) - everything else seems to have been covered cheers Pat
  2. I haven't caught up with your build for some time Wayne; youve made great progress and she looks great. Interesting comparison you have there. cheers Pat
  3. When you learn that trick Andy you can make a fortune selling the idea to all of us Nice work on the masts though! cheers Pat
  4. Thanks BE and Daniel; yep we have to assume artistic lisence. As you have said things changed with the ages and if you accept the 'lisence' there is much to learn from these. cheers Pat
  5. Hi Mark, according to Jim the freewheeling is only until the motor and whorls come up to speed; from that point on it should be held stopped while making rope. WRT to the die; after much similar frustration I stummbled on a 'trick' which is to get two of the threads through (reasonably easy), then wet the area behind the die on the feed side (I use spit ) and lay/place the damp end of the third at that spot (the damp holds the third end in place and pull it through with the other two. Works for me cheers Pat
  6. Thanks for the links Daniel; some interesting illustrations there. I have not looked at them all, but it is surprising to see that although space is tight around the tables etc, that the overheads are quite high. They are shown to be just above ther doortop for headline in the cabins etc, but much higher on the gundecks. i was always under the impression that although people were in general shorter back then, they would still have had restricted headroom 'tween decks. These illustrations would appear to show different (and assuming that in the cabins people could walk through a doorway without bending)? cheers Pat
  7. Hi Floyd, Mate, agree the difficulty of seeing the lay-up point especially with lighter coloured thread; with black thread I find I can see the form-up point easier against the polished aluminium but cannot see how well it is laying up. I have a couple of coloured bits of card (flat finish) I have cut to width and bent into 'U' shapes to place in the top of the channel between the two holes to enable me to see the lay-up point a little more easily. This is one area I think Jim could make an enhancement Perhaps adding a magnifying glass with a articulating arm (from a third hand?) may assist. I have one of those ring lights around a larger magnifying lens type desk-light I have recently started using so I will experiment with that also. I am assuming you are referring to the friction wheel and not the centre/core line spool feeder. The idea with the friction wheel is to let the motor and larger diameter whorl plate spin up to speed forming a basic twist in the feed threads before applying friction (by holding it still). At that point the whorl spools themselvs start to spin and lay up the rope. If you hold it still from the get-go you may be applying too much pressure to the lines and the motor? I think Jim may be best placed to answer this though. cheers Pat
  8. A lesson I learned with using balsa for filler blocks is to ensure they are sealed when you have finished sanding them to shape; otherwise the planks will not stick to them. I used a simple 50/50 PVA to water diluton and painted it on. cheers Pat
  9. Your build is coming along very nicely Toni, some great joinery there. cheers Pat
  10. You're making great progress Greg; she looks good! I am rebuilding my upper masts at the moment - that'll set me back another month cheers Pat
  11. Hi Mark and David, I was simply showing a picture to confirm what Adrieke was trying to name I agree, some of them are pretty bad, I tossed one and then took a small (certified) engineers square to the shop next time . I don't use these for squaring. I have invested in several cheap engineer squares (Indian made) which I check against the precision one. I have not found one of these not to true yet - not all cheap stuff is clumsey or imprecise it seems Someone has posted the following before, but I don't know if it has been caught-up yet? A quick way to check if the square is true is to draw a baseline on your bench or a piece of paper. Line up one edge of the square and draw a line down the other edge. Flip the square horizontally, line up the base edge again and try to have the other edge align with the vertical line just drawn. Draw another line down this edge and the two should be coincident if square; if it is not, then the degree of imprecision can be easily determined. Another way is to use a hard straight edge as the baseline (make sure it does not move ) A similar process can be used to determine if a straight edge is actually straight also. Hope this helps? cheers Pat
  12. Apart from the excellent build quality of his machines, the single other quality that sets them apart is his service. As another example, I purchased one of Jim's earliest ropewalks. While the build quality was great I rapidly became very frustrated with the quality of the rope it was producing. We corresponded for some time and Jim was quite patient. It became evident that trying to sort the problem by email was not going to work out, so Jim asked me to return the machine (at his cost) for him to have a look at. Now remember I live down under so this was not cheap In his words " I can't have a customer on the other side of the world unhappy with the product". It turned out one of the pulley belts had stretched (was too slack) and was causing inconsistent lay up of the rope. Jim returned the machine to me (again at his cost) and all is working fine now. Not too many companies would go to that extent! I have every machine Jim has built and none have let me down yet - that is simple testimony of the quality of his products. Jim you can pay me later - two crates of beer should do it - sorry folks being flippent - just a very happy customer! cheers Pat
  13. I had forgotten how nice that pear wood looked Gary; thanks for reposting. It sure highlights your excellent craftsmanship. cheers Pat
  14. Hi Sarah, i am slowly getting to read more of the build logs, and I am glad to have found yours. Some nice work there at the scale you are building to (not familiar with the size of the US cent but I assume the divisions on your cutting board are 1 "?). cheers Pat
  15. Lookin good Popeye. Mate, do you eat, sleep and socialise in the workshop. Your work pace is almost the same as Danny (is this a special club?) cheers Pat
  16. Thanks for the update Alistair; as other have said, the level of finiosh is very good. I would also say that having to redo the research on your other projects would be twice as much fun but joking about such a 'painful' experience is not going to improve the situation I hope you eventually recover from your lost work, but at least the first time around will have provided you with some pointers as to what to follow-up and whatg not too. cheers Pat
  17. Nice to see this masterpiece (radar assembly) again mate. I look forward to your further updates. cheers Pat
  18. A good start then mate - the buiding berth is becoming busier. What technique are you uising to ensure the bulkheads are true upright and perpendicular to the spine? cheers Pat
  19. They look very good Popeye, a fine addition to a fine build - now you had better get on with it instead of talking about lobsters, popcorn and oysters or the thread police will come after you cheers Pat
  20. Coming along very nicely Mark. Do you have any issues with glue seeping from the deck to beam joint and 'wooden' clamps? Hate to see'em stuck there for good mate cheers Pat
  21. Looks as good as the first time Paul great details; always a pleasure to relook at this build. cheers Pat
  22. Thanks Danny, a very useful collection for the scratch and kit builder alike. cheers
  23. Hi Tom and John. Great photos John and some useful ideas - leave it with me Tom, when I make up such coils I tend to do most of them off the model. I figure 8 the pin and finish with a dab of glue. I then use a former which is a simple scrap piece of square or rectangular wood and I place a pin on the upper and another on the side face. The position of the pins with respect to the edge determines the size of the loop and where the bend will occur - this needs to be closer to the top of one of the loops. I then create loops around the pins and the bend over the edge created a bit of a "bend" in trhe coil such that when I fit it, the tendency for it to stick out is eliminated. This is not a problem when you actually use the tail of the line and use the method described in my first post as the loop thgrough the coil goes over the pin and the rest can hang vertically. I hope that explains it clearly enough? cheers Pat
×
×
  • Create New...