Jump to content

Which side?


ubjs

Recommended Posts

 Sometimes one side is better than the other but the way I see most ships shown is bow on the right side as if the ship were sailing left to right. Is this because we read left to right? Are models predominantly shown with the bow on the left built in Middle Eastern countries, reading right to left?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plans are left for us from the era of wood and sail with the bow on the left and on the right.  There is no rule.  (It may be something as simple as the dominant hand of the designer.)   In museums, a predominance of left side on display or right side on display probably reflects the bias of the curator.  If your model is scratch built POF and one side is left frames showing and the other is the completed ship, it would depend on which view you wish to show off at the moment.

NRG member 45 years

 

Current:  

HMS Centurion 1732 - 60-gun 4th rate - Navall Timber framing

HMS Beagle 1831 refiit  10-gun brig with a small mizzen - Navall (ish) Timber framing

The U.S. Ex. Ex. 1838-1842
Flying Fish 1838  pilot schooner -  framed - ready for stern timbers
Porpose II  1836  brigantine/brig - framed - ready for hawse and stern timbers
Vincennes  1825  Sloop-of-War  -  timbers assembled, need shaping
Peacock  1828  Sloop-of -War  -  timbers ready for assembly
Sea Gull  1838  pilot schooner -  timbers ready for assembly
Relief  1835  ship - timbers ready for assembly

Other

Portsmouth  1843  Sloop-of-War  -  timbers ready for assembly
Le Commerce de Marseilles  1788   118 cannons - framed

La Renommee 1744 Frigate - framed - ready for hawse and stern timbers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Keith Black said:

 Sometimes one side is better than the other but the way I see most ships shown is bow on the right side as if the ship were sailing left to right. Is this because we read left to right? Are models predominantly shown with the bow on the left built in Middle Eastern countries, reading right to left?  

Does this mean my Japanese models should be shown vertically? 🙃

Clare Hess

He's a -> "HE"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, catopower said:

Does this mean my Japanese models should be shown vertically?

Only if they're modeled sinking. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the 1960’s when Naval Architecture students were taught hand drafting  of lines drawings, we were instructed that the bow always faced to the right.  This would mean the the drawing would show the ship’s starboard side.  I don’t know when this custom began.

 

Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roger Pellett said:

In the 1960’s when Naval Architecture students were taught hand drafting  of lines drawings, we were instructed that the bow always faced to the right.  This would mean the the drawing would show the ship’s starboard side.  I don’t know when this custom began.

 

Roger

I was also thinking about drawings. . . Chapelle's lines-drawings are very inconsistent, which strikes me as a little odd.  No doubt certain schools have their "ways," but others just followed their fancy.  The thought of a boat (in model or lines drawing) traveling the direction one reads is interesting, but when I 'read' a boat, I go from bow to stern, so my inclination is to draw them pointing left. (My mentor told me not to draw them that way, BTW...) 

Harvey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conventions mentioned above notwithstanding, but does anyone think any preference might be influenced at all by if you are left or right handed?  It may sound daft, I only say that as I like to display my models showing their port side, but it occurs to me that may be because I’m left handed and do the same for model aircraft.  Just a random thought....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No preference here but like others... there's "wall side" and "viewing side".   Purely random from where I sit.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've developed the habit of designating a "show" side of the model early on, and always work on the opposite side first. That way, initial mistakes are concentrated on the "wall" side and I have a better chance of a higher quality "show" side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Harvey Golden said:

Chapelle's lines-drawings are very inconsistent, which strikes me as a little odd. 

If HIC was replicating an existing historical plan, he used the direction on the original plan,

I am guessing that when he  was starting with a half model or table of offsets he used his own preferred orientation - probably bow at the right side edge.

NRG member 45 years

 

Current:  

HMS Centurion 1732 - 60-gun 4th rate - Navall Timber framing

HMS Beagle 1831 refiit  10-gun brig with a small mizzen - Navall (ish) Timber framing

The U.S. Ex. Ex. 1838-1842
Flying Fish 1838  pilot schooner -  framed - ready for stern timbers
Porpose II  1836  brigantine/brig - framed - ready for hawse and stern timbers
Vincennes  1825  Sloop-of-War  -  timbers assembled, need shaping
Peacock  1828  Sloop-of -War  -  timbers ready for assembly
Sea Gull  1838  pilot schooner -  timbers ready for assembly
Relief  1835  ship - timbers ready for assembly

Other

Portsmouth  1843  Sloop-of-War  -  timbers ready for assembly
Le Commerce de Marseilles  1788   118 cannons - framed

La Renommee 1744 Frigate - framed - ready for hawse and stern timbers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jaager said:

If HIC was replicating an existing historical plan, he used the direction on the original plan,

I am guessing that when he  was starting with a half model or table of offsets he used his own preferred orientation - probably bow at the right side edge.

That makes very good sense, but there are still a good number of drawings he made from lines that he took that are not pointed consistently.  I think if he had felt strongly about one direction or the other, he would've pointed them thus, even when basing a drawing off of a historic plan, but who knows?

-Harvey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...